From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anoop, Vijay" <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/xe/sysctrl: Fix byte-order reversal in mailbox frame transport
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:41:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921114109.BD4301F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921113030.4075591-2-anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/xe/sysctrl: transport fix breaks host-endian payload parsing on BE systems
--
commit 017fa1e0d0cfc7a44d6ea80c21fb3e61c82f81e1
Author: Anoop Vijay <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
drm/xe/sysctrl: Fix byte-order reversal in mailbox frame transport
This commit fixes byte-swapping in the mailbox frame transport on
big-endian systems by using get_unaligned_le32() and put_unaligned_le32().
This preserves the little-endian wire format instead of treating the byte
stream as host-endian u32 values.
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/751309/?series=172513&rev=5
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
> index 72baf1aa4b3ad..d5a34a24a0d60 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -84,16 +85,16 @@ static int sysctrl_read_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, void *frame,
> SYSCTRL_MB_DATA0, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA1, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA2, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA3
> };
> struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
> - u32 val[XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE / sizeof(u32)] = {0};
> + u8 buf[XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE] = {};
> u32 dw = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, sizeof(u32));
> u32 i;
>
> xe_assert(xe, len > 0 && len <= XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
>
> for (i = 0; i < dw; i++)
> - val[i] = xe_mmio_read32(sc->mmio, regs[i]);
> + put_unaligned_le32(xe_mmio_read32(sc->mmio, regs[i]), buf + i * sizeof(u32));
[Severity: High]
Does this correctly enforce a strict little-endian byte stream in the
buffer, but inadvertently break host-endian payload parsing on big-endian
systems?
While this fixes the transport byte-order, application payload structures
like xe_sysctrl_app_status_resp and xe_ras_get_counter_response define
their fields as native host-endian u32 and u64. Because they are natively
accessed by callers, they will read byte-swapped, corrupted data on
big-endian architectures.
For example, in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c:xe_sysctrl_check_app_status():
flags = resp.flags;
And in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c:get_counter():
*value = response.value;
Prior to this patch, readl()/writel() accidentally byte-swapped the entire
payload word-by-word on big-endian systems, which masked the fact that
payload struct fields weren't using __le32/__le64.
With this transport fix, will all sysctrl payload structs need to be updated
to use __le32/__le64 with explicit endianness conversions to prevent sysctrl
status checks and RAS counters from failing or reporting incorrect health
data?
>
> - memcpy(frame, val, len);
> + memcpy(frame, buf, len);
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921113030.4075591-2-anoop.c.vijay@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 11:30 [PATCH v1] drm/xe/sysctrl: Fix byte-order reversal in mailbox frame transport Anoop, Vijay
2026-09-21 11:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-21 11:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-21 13:40 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-21 18:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921114109.BD4301F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox