From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
david.e.box@linux.intel.com, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Support BMG PMT features for Xe
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:52:01 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23fe9eca-ebd3-4098-22ab-d21434026273@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZzSBpq2IakMrvV6h@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 11:30:33AM -0500, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> > Updates for PMT to support user offsets from the sysfs API.
> >
> > Addressed review comments for the Xe driver udpates.
>
> FWIW,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> If you have wish and time, there are problems with the drivers of different
> severities (from "fine as is" to "good to be fixed, but okay as is") I have
> noticed so far:
> - it uses s*printf() instead of sysfs_emit*()
> - it most likely never tested the corner cases. e.g.,
>
> if (disc_res->start >= pci_resource_start(pci_dev, i) &&
> (disc_res->start <= pci_resource_end(pci_dev, i))) {
>
> what is this supposed to mean? Probably someone wanted resource_contains() or
> alike to be called here.
> - slightly above the above piece the for-loop
>
> for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
>
> which probably want to use PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END)
While both work, in practice PCI_STD_NUM_BARS is way more common than
PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END.
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 16:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] Support BMG PMT features for Xe Michael J. Ruhl
2024-11-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86/intel/pmt: allow user offset for PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2024-11-13 10:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 21:57 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2024-11-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/vsec: Support BMG devices Michael J. Ruhl
2024-11-13 7:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Support BMG PMT features for Xe Patchwork
2024-11-13 7:55 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-13 7:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-13 8:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 8:10 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 8:11 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 8:29 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 10:06 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-13 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 10:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 13:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2024-11-13 17:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 18:40 ` David E. Box
2024-11-13 18:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 21:00 ` David E. Box
2024-11-13 18:21 ` Ruhl, Michael J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23fe9eca-ebd3-4098-22ab-d21434026273@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox