Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, david.e.box@linux.intel.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Support BMG PMT features for Xe
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:38:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzSBpq2IakMrvV6h@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112163035.2282499-1-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 11:30:33AM -0500, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> Updates for PMT to support user offsets from the sysfs API.
> 
> Addressed review comments for the Xe driver udpates.

FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

If you have wish and time, there are problems with the drivers of different
severities (from "fine as is" to "good to be fixed, but okay as is") I have
noticed so far:
- it uses s*printf() instead of sysfs_emit*()
- it most likely never tested the corner cases. e.g.,

	if (disc_res->start >= pci_resource_start(pci_dev, i) &&
	    (disc_res->start <= pci_resource_end(pci_dev, i))) {

  what is this supposed to mean? Probably someone wanted resource_contains() or
  alike to be called here.
- slightly above the above piece the for-loop

	for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)

  which probably want to use PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-13 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-12 16:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] Support BMG PMT features for Xe Michael J. Ruhl
2024-11-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/x86/intel/pmt: allow user offset for PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2024-11-13 10:26   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 21:57     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2024-11-12 16:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe/vsec: Support BMG devices Michael J. Ruhl
2024-11-13  7:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Support BMG PMT features for Xe Patchwork
2024-11-13  7:55 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-13  7:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-13  8:08 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-13  8:10 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-13  8:11 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-13  8:29 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-13 10:06 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-13 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 10:38 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-11-13 13:52   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-11-13 17:55     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 18:40     ` David E. Box
2024-11-13 18:59       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-11-13 21:00         ` David E. Box
2024-11-13 18:21   ` Ruhl, Michael J

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzSBpq2IakMrvV6h@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox