Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix a build error
@ 2024-01-27 15:53 Oak Zeng
  2024-01-27 15:46 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Oak Zeng @ 2024-01-27 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel, intel-xe
  Cc: Amaranath.Somalapuram, lucas.demarchi, ckoenig.leichtzumerken

This fixes a build failure on drm-tip. This issue was introduced during
merge of "drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6". For some
reason, the xe_bo.c part of above change is not merged. Manually merge
the missing part to drm_tip

Signed-off-by: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index 686d716c5581..d6a193060cc0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -38,22 +38,26 @@ static const struct ttm_place sys_placement_flags = {
 static struct ttm_placement sys_placement = {
 	.num_placement = 1,
 	.placement = &sys_placement_flags,
-	.num_busy_placement = 1,
-	.busy_placement = &sys_placement_flags,
 };
 
-static const struct ttm_place tt_placement_flags = {
-	.fpfn = 0,
-	.lpfn = 0,
-	.mem_type = XE_PL_TT,
-	.flags = 0,
+static const struct ttm_place tt_placement_flags[] = {
+	{
+		.fpfn = 0,
+		.lpfn = 0,
+		.mem_type = XE_PL_TT,
+		.flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_DESIRED,
+	},
+	{
+		.fpfn = 0,
+		.lpfn = 0,
+		.mem_type = XE_PL_SYSTEM,
+		.flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_FALLBACK,
+	}
 };
 
 static struct ttm_placement tt_placement = {
-	.num_placement = 1,
-	.placement = &tt_placement_flags,
-	.num_busy_placement = 1,
-	.busy_placement = &sys_placement_flags,
+	.num_placement = 2,
+	.placement = tt_placement_flags,
 };
 
 bool mem_type_is_vram(u32 mem_type)
@@ -230,8 +234,6 @@ static int __xe_bo_placement_for_flags(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
 	bo->placement = (struct ttm_placement) {
 		.num_placement = c,
 		.placement = bo->placements,
-		.num_busy_placement = c,
-		.busy_placement = bo->placements,
 	};
 
 	return 0;
@@ -251,7 +253,6 @@ static void xe_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo,
 		/* Don't handle scatter gather BOs */
 		if (tbo->type == ttm_bo_type_sg) {
 			placement->num_placement = 0;
-			placement->num_busy_placement = 0;
 			return;
 		}
 
@@ -1391,8 +1392,6 @@ static int __xe_bo_fixed_placement(struct xe_device *xe,
 	bo->placement = (struct ttm_placement) {
 		.num_placement = 1,
 		.placement = place,
-		.num_busy_placement = 1,
-		.busy_placement = place,
 	};
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2150,9 +2149,7 @@ int xe_bo_migrate(struct xe_bo *bo, u32 mem_type)
 
 	xe_place_from_ttm_type(mem_type, &requested);
 	placement.num_placement = 1;
-	placement.num_busy_placement = 1;
 	placement.placement = &requested;
-	placement.busy_placement = &requested;
 
 	/*
 	 * Stolen needs to be handled like below VRAM handling if we ever need
-- 
2.26.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-01 14:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-27 15:53 [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix a build error Oak Zeng
2024-01-27 15:46 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-01-27 15:46 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-01-27 15:47 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-01-27 15:54 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-01-27 15:54 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-01-27 15:56 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-01-27 16:23 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-01-29 16:48 ` [PATCH] " Christian König
2024-01-29 20:25   ` Thomas Hellström
2024-01-29 20:29     ` Zeng, Oak
2024-01-30  8:15       ` Thomas Hellström
2024-01-30 14:31     ` Christian König
2024-01-30 14:42       ` Thomas Hellström

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox