From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Animesh Manna" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
"Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/alpm: Replace is_edp() with alpm_is_possible()
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 12:22:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <310f857615e378179fe25a6f39d62cfae8ca8fc9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023084147.572535-4-animesh.manna@intel.com>
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> wrote:
> Add a separate alpm_is_possible() which will check for both edp and dp.
AFAICT you're not ready to actually do ALPM for non-eDP at this point. I
presume things will go bonkers if you run this commit.
You can add the helper, but keep the functionality unchanged until
you've actually implemented ALPM for DP.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index 6372f533f65b..973791f8956c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,16 @@ bool intel_alpm_is_alpm_aux_less(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> (crtc_state->has_lobf && intel_alpm_aux_less_wake_supported(intel_dp));
> }
>
> +bool intel_alpm_is_possible(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> +
> + return (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12 && intel_dp->alpm_dpcd) ||
> + (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 35 &&
> + intel_dp->lttpr_common_caps[DP_LTTPR_ALPM_CAPABILITIES -
> + DP_LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV]);
> +}
> +
> void intel_alpm_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> u8 dpcd;
> @@ -265,7 +275,7 @@ void intel_alpm_lobf_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> if (intel_dp->alpm.sink_alpm_error)
> return;
>
> - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> + if (!intel_alpm_is_possible(intel_dp))
> return;
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20)
> @@ -416,7 +426,7 @@ void intel_alpm_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
>
> - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> + if (!intel_alpm_is_possible(intel_dp))
> continue;
>
> if (old_crtc_state->has_lobf) {
> @@ -468,7 +478,7 @@ void intel_alpm_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
>
> - if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> + if (intel_alpm_is_possible(intel_dp)) {
> intel_alpm_enable_sink(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> intel_alpm_configure(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> index 53599b464dea..0c9972faa2e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct intel_connector;
> struct intel_atomic_state;
> struct intel_crtc;
>
> +bool intel_alpm_is_possible(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void intel_alpm_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> bool intel_alpm_compute_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 8:41 [PATCH 0/8] Enable DP2.1 alpm Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 8:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/alpm: Add dpcd definition for DP2.1 alpm capability Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 8:41 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/alpm: alpm_init() for DP2.1 Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 9:14 ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-23 8:41 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/alpm: Replace is_edp() with alpm_is_possible() Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 9:22 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-10-23 8:41 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/alpm: Enable debugfs for DP2.1 Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 8:41 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/alpm: Auxless wake time calculation for Xe3p Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 9:29 ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-23 8:41 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/alpm: Half LFPS cycle calculation Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 9:31 ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-23 8:41 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/alpm: Introduce has_alpm to decouple from pr/psr2/lobf Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 8:41 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/alpm: Program lttpr count for DP 2.1 alpm Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 14:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Enable DP2.1 alpm Patchwork
2025-10-23 15:06 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-23 15:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-10-24 0:30 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=310f857615e378179fe25a6f39d62cfae8ca8fc9@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox