Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Animesh Manna" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	"Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/alpm: Half LFPS cycle calculation
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 12:31:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54493f4fef12fab9acd8681bfea83399e04f0024@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023084147.572535-7-animesh.manna@intel.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> wrote:
> Add support for half LFPS cycle calculation for DP2.1 ALPM as dependent
> parameters got changed.
>
> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index ee5b1e3d79d2..f7803088f916 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -68,31 +68,43 @@ static int get_silence_period_symbols(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  		1000 / 1000;
>  }
>  
> -static void get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +static void get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +					const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  					int *min, int *max)
>  {
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> +
> +	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> +		*min = 320;
> +		*max = 1600;
> +		return;

You already have an if ladder, make this part of it instead of returning
early.

> +	}
> +
>  	if (crtc_state->port_clock < 540000) {
> -		*min = 65 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT;
> -		*max = 75 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT;
> +		*min = DISPLAY_VER(display) < 35 ? 65 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT : 140;
> +		*max = DISPLAY_VER(display) < 35 ? 75 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT : 800;
>  	} else {
>  		*min = 140;
>  		*max = 800;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int get_lfps_cycle_time(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +static int get_lfps_cycle_time(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +			       const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	int tlfps_cycle_min, tlfps_cycle_max;
>  
> -	get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(crtc_state, &tlfps_cycle_min,
> +	get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(intel_dp, crtc_state, &tlfps_cycle_min,
>  				    &tlfps_cycle_max);
>  
>  	return tlfps_cycle_min +  (tlfps_cycle_max - tlfps_cycle_min) / 2;
>  }
>  
> -static int get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +static int get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +				      const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> -	return get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state) * crtc_state->port_clock / 1000 /
> +	return get_lfps_cycle_time(intel_dp, crtc_state) *
> +		crtc_state->port_clock / 1000 /
>  		1000 / (2 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT);
>  }
>  
> @@ -124,7 +136,7 @@ static int get_establishment_period(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	if (lttpr_count) {
>  		int tlw = 13000;
>  		int tcs = 10000;
> -		int tlfps_period = get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state);
> +		int tlfps_period = get_lfps_cycle_time(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>  		int tdcs = (SILENCE_PERIOD_TIME + t1 + tcs +
>  			    (lttpr_count - 1) * (tlw + tlfps_period));
>  		int tacds = 70000;
> @@ -182,7 +194,7 @@ static int _lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	int establishment_period = get_establishment_period(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>  	int switch_to_active = get_switch_to_active(crtc_state->port_clock);
>  
> -	return DIV_ROUND_UP(tphy2_p2_to_p0 + get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state) +
> +	return DIV_ROUND_UP(tphy2_p2_to_p0 + get_lfps_cycle_time(intel_dp, crtc_state) +
>  			    establishment_period + switch_to_active, 1000);
>  }
>  
> @@ -200,7 +212,7 @@ _lnl_compute_aux_less_alpm_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  						       aux_less_wake_time);
>  	silence_period = get_silence_period_symbols(crtc_state);
>  
> -	lfps_half_cycle = get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(crtc_state);
> +	lfps_half_cycle = get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>  
>  	if (aux_less_wake_lines > ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK ||
>  	    silence_period > PORT_ALPM_CTL_SILENCE_PERIOD_MASK ||

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-23  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-23  8:41 [PATCH 0/8] Enable DP2.1 alpm Animesh Manna
2025-10-23  8:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/alpm: Add dpcd definition for DP2.1 alpm capability Animesh Manna
2025-10-23  8:41 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/alpm: alpm_init() for DP2.1 Animesh Manna
2025-10-23  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-23  8:41 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/alpm: Replace is_edp() with alpm_is_possible() Animesh Manna
2025-10-23  9:22   ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-23  8:41 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/alpm: Enable debugfs for DP2.1 Animesh Manna
2025-10-23  8:41 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/alpm: Auxless wake time calculation for Xe3p Animesh Manna
2025-10-23  9:29   ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-23  8:41 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/alpm: Half LFPS cycle calculation Animesh Manna
2025-10-23  9:31   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-10-23  8:41 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/alpm: Introduce has_alpm to decouple from pr/psr2/lobf Animesh Manna
2025-10-23  8:41 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/alpm: Program lttpr count for DP 2.1 alpm Animesh Manna
2025-10-23 14:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Enable DP2.1 alpm Patchwork
2025-10-23 15:06 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-10-23 15:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-10-24  0:30 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54493f4fef12fab9acd8681bfea83399e04f0024@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox