public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
	<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	<simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>, <airlied@gmail.com>,
	<pratik.bari@intel.com>, <joshua.santosh.ranjan@intel.com>,
	<ashwin.kumar.kulkarni@intel.com>, <shubham.kumar@intel.com>,
	<ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com>,
	"Himal Prasad Ghimiray" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add support for PVC SOC errors
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 15:13:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3158c8f4-a33f-4124-8d9f-e3918ce4d8bb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aXNOgJrHpMtcox-S@black.igk.intel.com>



On 1/23/2026 4:03 PM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 09:30:26AM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>> Report the SOC nonfatal/fatal hardware error and update the counters.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Add ID's and names as uAPI (Rodrigo)
>>
>> v3: reorder and align arrays
>>      remove redundant string err
>>      use REG_BIT
>>      fix aesthic review comments (Raag)
>>      use only correctable/uncorrectable error severity (Aravind)
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_hw_error_regs.h |  24 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c           | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   2 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_hw_error_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_hw_error_regs.h
>> index 5eeb0be27300..b9e072f9e56c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_hw_error_regs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_hw_error_regs.h
>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
>>   								  DEV_ERR_STAT_NONFATAL))
>>   
>>   #define   XE_CSC_ERROR				17
>> +#define   XE_SOC_ERROR				16
>>   #define   XE_GT_ERROR				0
>>   
>>   #define ERR_STAT_GT_FATAL_VECTOR_0		0x100260
>> @@ -62,4 +63,27 @@
>>   						ERR_STAT_GT_COR_VECTOR_REG(x) : \
>>   						ERR_STAT_GT_FATAL_VECTOR_REG(x))
>>   
>> +#define SOC_PVC_MASTER_BASE			0x282000
>> +#define SOC_PVC_SLAVE_BASE			0x283000
>> +
>> +#define SOC_GCOERRSTS				0x200
>> +#define SOC_GNFERRSTS				0x210
>> +#define SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, x)	XE_REG(_PICK_EVEN((x), \
>> +								  (base) + SOC_GCOERRSTS, \
>> +								  (base) + SOC_GNFERRSTS))
>> +#define   SOC_SLAVE_IEH				REG_BIT(1)
>> +#define   SOC_IEH0_LOCAL_ERR_STATUS		REG_BIT(0)
>> +#define   SOC_IEH1_LOCAL_ERR_STATUS		REG_BIT(0)
>> +
>> +#define SOC_GSYSEVTCTL				0x264
>> +#define SOC_GSYSEVTCTL_REG(base, slave_base, x)	XE_REG(_PICK_EVEN((x), \
> 
> Can we add 'master' for consistency? This gets me confused with
> other macros where 'base' can mean either one.

sure..

> 
>> +								  (base) + SOC_GSYSEVTCTL, \
>> +								  (slave_base) + SOC_GSYSEVTCTL))
>> +
>> +#define SOC_LERRUNCSTS				0x280
>> +#define SOC_LERRCORSTS				0x294
>> +#define SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, hw_err)	XE_REG(hw_err == HARDWARE_ERROR_CORRECTABLE ? \
>> +						      (base) + SOC_LERRCORSTS : \
>> +						      (base) + SOC_LERRUNCSTS)
> 
> Nit: Perhaps an additional whitespace is needed? ;)

Ahh.. yeah it looks combined. if i do that it'll mess the indentation.

I will add an extra tab for the entire file

> 
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
>> index bd0cf61741ca..d1c30bb199d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>   #define  GT_HW_ERROR_MAX_ERR_BITS	16
>>   #define  HEC_UNCORR_FW_ERR_BITS 	4
>>   #define  XE_RAS_REG_SIZE		32
>> +#define  XE_SOC_NUM_IEH 		2
>>   
>>   extern struct fault_attr inject_csc_hw_error;
>>   static const char * const error_severity[] = DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_SEVERITY_NAMES;
>> @@ -31,7 +32,8 @@ static const char * const hec_uncorrected_fw_errors[] = {
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const unsigned long xe_hw_error_map[] = {
>> -	[XE_GT_ERROR] = DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_CLASS_GT,
>> +	[XE_GT_ERROR]	= DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_CLASS_GT,
>> +	[XE_SOC_ERROR]	= DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_CLASS_SOC,
>>   };
>>   
>>   enum gt_vector_regs {
>> @@ -54,6 +56,92 @@ static enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity hw_err_to_severity(enum hardware_error hw_
>>   	return DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_SEVERITY_UNCORRECTABLE;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static const char * const pvc_master_global_err_reg[] = {
>> +	[0 ... 1]	= "Undefined",
>> +	[2]		= "HBM SS0: Channel0",
>> +	[3]		= "HBM SS0: Channel1",
>> +	[4]		= "HBM SS0: Channel2",
>> +	[5]		= "HBM SS0: Channel3",
>> +	[6]		= "HBM SS0: Channel4",
>> +	[7]		= "HBM SS0: Channel5",
>> +	[8]		= "HBM SS0: Channel6",
>> +	[9]		= "HBM SS0: Channel7",
>> +	[10]		= "HBM SS1: Channel0",
>> +	[11]		= "HBM SS1: Channel1",
>> +	[12]		= "HBM SS1: Channel2",
>> +	[13]		= "HBM SS1: Channel3",
>> +	[14]		= "HBM SS1: Channel4",
>> +	[15]		= "HBM SS1: Channel5",
>> +	[16]		= "HBM SS1: Channel6",
>> +	[17]		= "HBM SS1: Channel7",
>> +	[18 ... 31]	= "Undefined",
>> +};
> 
> I'd add static_assert() against register size here.

These are anyway register values. so i think it won't get modified above 
32 bits. Yeah sure i can add a static_assert


> 
>> +static const char * const pvc_slave_global_err_reg[] = {
>> +	[0]		= "Undefined",
>> +	[1]		= "HBM SS2: Channel0",
>> +	[2]		= "HBM SS2: Channel1",
>> +	[3]		= "HBM SS2: Channel2",
>> +	[4]		= "HBM SS2: Channel3",
>> +	[5]		= "HBM SS2: Channel4",
>> +	[6]		= "HBM SS2: Channel5",
>> +	[7]		= "HBM SS2: Channel6",
>> +	[8]		= "HBM SS2: Channel7",
>> +	[9]		= "HBM SS3: Channel0",
>> +	[10]		= "HBM SS3: Channel1",
>> +	[11]		= "HBM SS3: Channel2",
>> +	[12]		= "HBM SS3: Channel3",
>> +	[13]		= "HBM SS3: Channel4",
>> +	[14]		= "HBM SS3: Channel5",
>> +	[15]		= "HBM SS3: Channel6",
>> +	[16]		= "HBM SS3: Channel7",
>> +	[17]		= "Undefined",
>> +	[18]		= "ANR MDFI",
>> +	[19 ... 31]	= "Undefined",
>> +};
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>> +static const char * const pvc_slave_local_fatal_err_reg[] = {
>> +	[0]		= "Local IEH: Malformed PCIe AER",
>> +	[1]		= "Local IEH: Malformed PCIe ERR",
>> +	[2]		= "Local IEH: UR conditions in IEH",
>> +	[3]		= "Local IEH: From SERR Sources",
>> +	[4 ... 19]	= "Undefined",
>> +	[20]		= "Malformed MCA error packet (HBM/Punit)",
>> +	[21 ... 31]	= "Undefined",
>> +};
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>> +static const char * const pvc_master_local_fatal_err_reg[] = {
>> +	[0]		= "Local IEH: Malformed IOSF PCIe AER",
>> +	[1]		= "Local IEH: Malformed IOSF PCIe ERR",
>> +	[2]		= "Local IEH: UR RESPONSE",
>> +	[3]		= "Local IEH: From SERR SPI controller",
>> +	[4]		= "Base Die MDFI T2T",
>> +	[5]		= "Undefined",
>> +	[6]		= "Base Die MDFI T2C",
>> +	[7]		= "Undefined",
>> +	[8]		= "Invalid CSC PSF Command Parity",
>> +	[9]		= "Invalid CSC PSF Unexpected Completion",
>> +	[10]		= "Invalid CSC PSF Unsupported Request",
>> +	[11]		= "Invalid PCIe PSF Command Parity",
>> +	[12]		= "PCIe PSF Unexpected Completion",
>> +	[13]		= "PCIe PSF Unsupported Request",
>> +	[14 ... 19]	= "Undefined",
>> +	[20]		= "Malformed MCA error packet (HBM/Punit)",
>> +	[21 ... 31]	= "Undefined",
>> +};
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>> +static const char * const pvc_master_local_nonfatal_err_reg[] = {
>> +	[0 ... 3]	= "Undefined",
>> +	[4]		= "Base Die MDFI T2T",
>> +	[5]		= "Undefined",
>> +	[6]		= "Base Die MDFI T2C",
>> +	[7]		= "Undefined",
>> +	[8]		= "Invalid CSC PSF Command Parity",
>> +	[9]		= "Invalid CSC PSF Unexpected Completion",
>> +	[10]		= "Invalid PCIe PSF Command Parity",
>> +	[11 ... 31]	= "Undefined",
>> +};
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>>   static bool fault_inject_csc_hw_error(void)
>>   {
>>   	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && should_fail(&inject_csc_hw_error, 1);
>> @@ -132,6 +220,26 @@ static void log_gt_err(struct xe_tile *tile, const char *name, int i, u32 err,
>>   			 name, severity_str, i, err);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void log_soc_error(struct xe_tile *tile, const char * const *reg_info,
>> +			  const enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity, u32 err_bit, u32 index)
>> +{
>> +	const char *severity_str = error_severity[severity];
>> +	struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
>> +	struct xe_drm_ras *ras = &xe->ras;
>> +	struct xe_drm_ras_counter *info = ras->info[severity];
>> +	const char *name;
>> +
>> +	name = reg_info[err_bit];
>> +
>> +	if (strcmp(name, "Undefined")) {
>> +		if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_SEVERITY_UNCORRECTABLE)
> 
> Same comment as last patch.

Will reverse

> 
>> +			drm_err_ratelimited(&xe->drm, "%s SOC %s detected", name, severity_str);
>> +		else
>> +			drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s SOC %s detected", name, severity_str);
>> +		atomic64_inc(&info[index].counter);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void gt_hw_error_handler(struct xe_tile *tile, const enum hardware_error hw_err,
>>   				u32 error_id)
>>   {
>> @@ -210,6 +318,93 @@ static void gt_hw_error_handler(struct xe_tile *tile, const enum hardware_error
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void soc_hw_error_handler(struct xe_tile *tile, const enum hardware_error hw_err,
>> +				 u32 error_id)
>> +{
>> +	const enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity = hw_err_to_severity(hw_err);
>> +	struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
>> +	struct xe_mmio *mmio = &tile->mmio;
>> +	unsigned long master_global_errstat, slave_global_errstat;
>> +	unsigned long master_local_errstat, slave_local_errstat;
>> +	u32 base, slave_base, regbit;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	if (xe->info.platform != XE_PVC)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	base = SOC_PVC_MASTER_BASE;
> 
> 'master'?

sure.

> 
>> +	slave_base = SOC_PVC_SLAVE_BASE;
>> +
>> +	/* Mask error type in GSYSEVTCTL so that no new errors of the type will be reported */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < XE_SOC_NUM_IEH; i++)
>> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GSYSEVTCTL_REG(base, slave_base, i), ~REG_BIT(hw_err));
>> +
>> +	if (hw_err == HARDWARE_ERROR_CORRECTABLE) {
>> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, hw_err), REG_GENMASK(31, 0));
>> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, hw_err), REG_GENMASK(31, 0));
>> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, hw_err),
>> +				REG_GENMASK(31, 0));
>> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, hw_err),
>> +				REG_GENMASK(31, 0));
>> +		goto unmask_gsysevtctl;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Read the master global IEH error register if BIT 1 is set then process
> 
> BIT(1)
> 
>> +	 * the slave IEH first. If BIT 0 in global error register is set then process
> 
> BIT(0)
> 
>> +	 * the corresponding local error registers
> 
> Punctuations please!
> 
>> +	 */
>> +	master_global_errstat = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, hw_err));
>> +	if (master_global_errstat & SOC_SLAVE_IEH) {
>> +		slave_global_errstat = xe_mmio_read32(mmio,
>> +						      SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, hw_err));
>> +		if (slave_global_errstat & SOC_IEH1_LOCAL_ERR_STATUS) {
>> +			slave_local_errstat = xe_mmio_read32(mmio,
>> +							     SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base,
>> +										    hw_err));
> 
> With long names usually comes the ugly wrapping :(
> So let's either try to shorten some of them here or split the condition
> into another function for readability.
> 
>> +			if (hw_err == HARDWARE_ERROR_FATAL) {
> 
> So we don't log for other severities?

Requirement is only fatal. There are no errors defined for non-fatal

> 
>> +				for_each_set_bit(regbit, &slave_local_errstat, XE_RAS_REG_SIZE)
>> +					log_soc_error(tile, pvc_slave_local_fatal_err_reg,
>> +						      severity, regbit, error_id);
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, hw_err),
>> +					slave_local_errstat);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		for_each_set_bit(regbit, &slave_global_errstat, XE_RAS_REG_SIZE)
>> +			log_soc_error(tile, pvc_slave_global_err_reg, severity, regbit, error_id);
>> +
>> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(slave_base, hw_err),
>> +				slave_global_errstat);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (master_global_errstat & SOC_IEH0_LOCAL_ERR_STATUS) {
> 
> Ditto for split.

This should be fine. i will split the slave into a function and retain 
master in this.

Riana

> 
> Raag
> 
>> +		master_local_errstat = xe_mmio_read32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, hw_err));
>> +
>> +		for_each_set_bit(regbit, &master_local_errstat, XE_RAS_REG_SIZE) {
>> +			const char * const *reg_info = (hw_err == HARDWARE_ERROR_FATAL) ?
>> +						       pvc_master_local_fatal_err_reg :
>> +						       pvc_master_local_nonfatal_err_reg;
>> +
>> +			log_soc_error(tile, reg_info, severity, regbit, error_id);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_LOCAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, hw_err), master_local_errstat);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	for_each_set_bit(regbit, &master_global_errstat, XE_RAS_REG_SIZE)
>> +		log_soc_error(tile, pvc_master_global_err_reg, severity, regbit, error_id);
>> +
>> +	xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GLOBAL_ERR_STAT_REG(base, hw_err), master_global_errstat);
>> +
>> +unmask_gsysevtctl:
>> +	for (i = 0; i < XE_SOC_NUM_IEH; i++)
>> +		xe_mmio_write32(mmio, SOC_GSYSEVTCTL_REG(base, slave_base, i),
>> +				(DRM_XE_RAS_ERROR_SEVERITY_MAX << 1) + 1);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void hw_error_source_handler(struct xe_tile *tile, const enum hardware_error hw_err)
>>   {
>>   	const enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity = hw_err_to_severity(hw_err);
>> @@ -263,8 +458,11 @@ static void hw_error_source_handler(struct xe_tile *tile, const enum hardware_er
>>   				 "TILE%d reported %s %s, bit[%d] is set\n",
>>   				 tile->id, name, severity_str, err_bit);
>>   		}
>> +
>>   		if (err_bit == XE_GT_ERROR)
>>   			gt_hw_error_handler(tile, hw_err, error_id);
>> +		if (err_bit == XE_SOC_ERROR)
>> +			soc_hw_error_handler(tile, hw_err, error_id);
>>   	}
>>   
>>   clear_reg:
>> -- 
>> 2.47.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-27  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-19  4:00 [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce DRM_RAS using generic netlink for RAS Riana Tauro
2026-01-19  3:36 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce DRM_RAS using generic netlink for RAS (rev4) Patchwork
2026-01-19  3:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-01-19  3:52 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-01-19  4:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/ras: Introduce the DRM RAS infrastructure over generic netlink Riana Tauro
2026-01-22 21:51   ` Zack McKevitt
2026-02-02  6:20     ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-19  4:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/xe/xe_drm_ras: Add support for drm ras Riana Tauro
2026-01-20 17:01   ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-28  6:51     ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-28  7:15       ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-28  7:34         ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-19  4:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add support for GT hardware errors Riana Tauro
2026-01-19  9:06   ` kernel test robot
2026-01-21  7:09   ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-27  8:29     ` Riana Tauro
2026-01-27 10:12       ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-19  4:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add support for PVC SOC errors Riana Tauro
2026-01-23 10:33   ` Raag Jadav
2026-01-27  9:43     ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2026-01-19  4:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure for Introduce DRM_RAS using generic netlink for RAS (rev4) Patchwork
2026-01-19  5:33 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3158c8f4-a33f-4124-8d9f-e3918ce4d8bb@intel.com \
    --to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashwin.kumar.kulkarni@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joshua.santosh.ranjan@intel.com \
    --cc=pratik.bari@intel.com \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=shubham.kumar@intel.com \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox