Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dong, Zhanjun" <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/7] drm/xe: Forcefully tear down exec queues in GuC submit fini
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:30:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31874a01-7028-4db7-af71-b22108bc9e02@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abRb842rJCYXF3dK@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>


On 2026-03-13 2:48 p.m., Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 12:34:30PM -0400, Dong, Zhanjun wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2026-03-10 6:50 p.m., Zhanjun Dong wrote:
>>> In GuC submit fini, forcefully tear down any exec queues by disabling
>>> CTs, stopping the scheduler (which cleans up lost G2H), killing all
>>> remaining queues, and resuming scheduling to allow any remaining cleanup
>>> actions to complete and signal any remaining fences.
>>>
>>> Split guc_submit_fini into device related and software only part. Using
>>> device-managed and drm-managed action guarantees the correct ordering of
>>> cleanup.
>>>
>>> Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c        | 26 ++++++++++++++--
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h        |  1 +
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>    3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
>>> index e75653a5e797..f6964b8f8ede 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
>>> @@ -1399,15 +1399,37 @@ int xe_guc_enable_communication(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> -int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>> +/**
>>> + * xe_guc_softreset() - Soft reset GuC
>>> + * @guc: The GuC object
>>> + *
>>> + * Send soft reset command to GuC through mmio send.
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: 0 if success, otherwise error code
>>> + */
>>> +int xe_guc_softreset(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>>    {
>>> -	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>>>    	u32 action[] = {
>>>    		XE_GUC_ACTION_CLIENT_SOFT_RESET,
>>>    	};
>>>    	int ret;
>>> +	if (!xe_uc_fw_is_running(&guc->fw))
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>>    	ret = xe_guc_mmio_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
>>> +	if (ret)
>>> +		return ret;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = xe_guc_softreset(guc);
>>>    	if (ret) {
>>>    		xe_gt_err(gt, "GuC suspend failed: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
>>>    		return ret;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
>>> index 66e7edc70ed9..02514914f404 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ int xe_guc_opt_in_features_enable(struct xe_guc *guc);
>>>    void xe_guc_runtime_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc);
>>>    void xe_guc_runtime_resume(struct xe_guc *guc);
>>>    int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc);
>>> +int xe_guc_softreset(struct xe_guc *guc);
>>>    void xe_guc_notify(struct xe_guc *guc);
>>>    int xe_guc_auth_huc(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 rsa_addr);
>>>    int xe_guc_mmio_send(struct xe_guc *guc, const u32 *request, u32 len);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>>> index b31e0e0af5cb..8afd424b27fb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>>> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
>>>    #define XE_GUC_EXEC_QUEUE_CGP_CONTEXT_ERROR_LEN		6
>>> +static int guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc);
>>> +
>>>    static struct xe_guc *
>>>    exec_queue_to_guc(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>>>    {
>>> @@ -238,7 +240,7 @@ static bool exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>>>    		 EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_BANNED));
>>>    }
>>> -static void guc_submit_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
>>> +static void guc_submit_sw_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
>>>    	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
>>> @@ -256,6 +258,19 @@ static void guc_submit_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
>>>    	xa_destroy(&guc->submission_state.exec_queue_lookup);
>>>    }
>>> +static void guc_submit_fini(void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
>>> +
>>> +	/* Forcefully kill any remaining exec queues */
>> Shall we do VF bypass here?
>>
> 
> Why? These flows work on VFs and are still required. This is initiating
> a software cut off communication with the GuC and cleaning up any lost
> communications with the GuC so all queues are destroyed.
> 
> Matt

Got it. LGTM

Reviewed-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>

> 
>> Regards,
>> Zhanjun Dong
>>> +	xe_guc_ct_stop(&guc->ct);
>>> +	guc_submit_reset_prepare(guc);
>>> +	xe_guc_softreset(guc);
>>> +	xe_guc_submit_stop(guc);
>>> +	xe_uc_fw_sanitize(&guc->fw);
>>> +	xe_guc_submit_pause_abort(guc);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static void guc_submit_wedged_fini(void *arg)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
>>> @@ -325,7 +340,11 @@ int xe_guc_submit_init(struct xe_guc *guc, unsigned int num_ids)
>>>    	guc->submission_state.initialized = true;
>>> -	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, guc_submit_fini, guc);
>>> +	err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, guc_submit_sw_fini, guc);
>>> +	if (err)
>>> +		return err;
>>> +
>>> +	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, guc_submit_fini, guc);
>>>    }
>>>    /*
>>> @@ -2298,6 +2317,7 @@ static const struct xe_exec_queue_ops guc_exec_queue_ops = {
>>>    static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
>>> +	bool do_destroy = false;
>>>    	/* Stop scheduling + flush any DRM scheduler operations */
>>>    	xe_sched_submission_stop(sched);
>>> @@ -2305,7 +2325,7 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>>>    	/* Clean up lost G2H + reset engine state */
>>>    	if (exec_queue_registered(q)) {
>>>    		if (exec_queue_destroyed(q))
>>> -			__guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q);
>>> +			do_destroy = true;
>>>    	}
>>>    	if (q->guc->suspend_pending) {
>>>    		set_exec_queue_suspended(q);
>>> @@ -2341,18 +2361,15 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>>>    			xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(q);
>>>    		}
>>>    	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (do_destroy)
>>> +		__guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q);
>>>    }
>>> -int xe_guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>> +static int guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>>    {
>>>    	int ret;
>>> -	if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc), vf_recovery(guc)))
>>> -		return 0;
>>> -
>>> -	if (!guc->submission_state.initialized)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> -
>>>    	/*
>>>    	 * Using an atomic here rather than submission_state.lock as this
>>>    	 * function can be called while holding the CT lock (engine reset
>>> @@ -2367,6 +2384,17 @@ int xe_guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>>    	return ret;
>>>    }
>>> +int xe_guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc), vf_recovery(guc)))
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!guc->submission_state.initialized)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	return guc_submit_reset_prepare(guc);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    void xe_guc_submit_reset_wait(struct xe_guc *guc)
>>>    {
>>>    	wait_event(guc->ct.wq, xe_device_wedged(guc_to_xe(guc)) ||
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-13 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10 22:50 [PATCH v9 0/7] Attempt to fixup reset, wedge, unload corner cases Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] drm/xe: Always kill exec queues in xe_guc_submit_pause_abort Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] drm/xe: Forcefully tear down exec queues in GuC submit fini Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-11 16:34   ` Dong, Zhanjun
2026-03-13 18:48     ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-13 20:30       ` Dong, Zhanjun [this message]
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] drm/xe: Trigger queue cleanup if not in wedged mode 2 Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-11 16:33   ` Dong, Zhanjun
2026-03-13 18:49     ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-13 20:31       ` Dong, Zhanjun
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] drm/xe: Use XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG_NO_RESET enum instead of magic number Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] drm/xe/guc: Ensure CT state transitions via STOP before DISABLED Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] drm/xe/uc: Drop xe_guc_sanitize in favor of managed cleanup Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-13 22:53   ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] drm/xe: Open-code GGTT MMIO access protection Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Attempt to fixup reset, wedge, unload corner cases Patchwork
2026-03-10 22:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-10 23:41 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-11 16:20 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31874a01-7028-4db7-af71-b22108bc9e02@intel.com \
    --to=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox