From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Dong, Zhanjun" <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/7] drm/xe: Forcefully tear down exec queues in GuC submit fini
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:48:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abRb842rJCYXF3dK@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70fc23c8-a926-4767-bb8b-bf134a6eea95@intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 12:34:30PM -0400, Dong, Zhanjun wrote:
>
>
> On 2026-03-10 6:50 p.m., Zhanjun Dong wrote:
> > In GuC submit fini, forcefully tear down any exec queues by disabling
> > CTs, stopping the scheduler (which cleans up lost G2H), killing all
> > remaining queues, and resuming scheduling to allow any remaining cleanup
> > actions to complete and signal any remaining fences.
> >
> > Split guc_submit_fini into device related and software only part. Using
> > device-managed and drm-managed action guarantees the correct ordering of
> > cleanup.
> >
> > Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> > index e75653a5e797..f6964b8f8ede 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> > @@ -1399,15 +1399,37 @@ int xe_guc_enable_communication(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > +/**
> > + * xe_guc_softreset() - Soft reset GuC
> > + * @guc: The GuC object
> > + *
> > + * Send soft reset command to GuC through mmio send.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 if success, otherwise error code
> > + */
> > +int xe_guc_softreset(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > {
> > - struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> > u32 action[] = {
> > XE_GUC_ACTION_CLIENT_SOFT_RESET,
> > };
> > int ret;
> > + if (!xe_uc_fw_is_running(&guc->fw))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > ret = xe_guc_mmio_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > +{
> > + struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = xe_guc_softreset(guc);
> > if (ret) {
> > xe_gt_err(gt, "GuC suspend failed: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> > return ret;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
> > index 66e7edc70ed9..02514914f404 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.h
> > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ int xe_guc_opt_in_features_enable(struct xe_guc *guc);
> > void xe_guc_runtime_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc);
> > void xe_guc_runtime_resume(struct xe_guc *guc);
> > int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc);
> > +int xe_guc_softreset(struct xe_guc *guc);
> > void xe_guc_notify(struct xe_guc *guc);
> > int xe_guc_auth_huc(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 rsa_addr);
> > int xe_guc_mmio_send(struct xe_guc *guc, const u32 *request, u32 len);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > index b31e0e0af5cb..8afd424b27fb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
> > #define XE_GUC_EXEC_QUEUE_CGP_CONTEXT_ERROR_LEN 6
> > +static int guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc);
> > +
> > static struct xe_guc *
> > exec_queue_to_guc(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > {
> > @@ -238,7 +240,7 @@ static bool exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_BANNED));
> > }
> > -static void guc_submit_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
> > +static void guc_submit_sw_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
> > {
> > struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
> > struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> > @@ -256,6 +258,19 @@ static void guc_submit_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
> > xa_destroy(&guc->submission_state.exec_queue_lookup);
> > }
> > +static void guc_submit_fini(void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
> > +
> > + /* Forcefully kill any remaining exec queues */
> Shall we do VF bypass here?
>
Why? These flows work on VFs and are still required. This is initiating
a software cut off communication with the GuC and cleaning up any lost
communications with the GuC so all queues are destroyed.
Matt
> Regards,
> Zhanjun Dong
> > + xe_guc_ct_stop(&guc->ct);
> > + guc_submit_reset_prepare(guc);
> > + xe_guc_softreset(guc);
> > + xe_guc_submit_stop(guc);
> > + xe_uc_fw_sanitize(&guc->fw);
> > + xe_guc_submit_pause_abort(guc);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void guc_submit_wedged_fini(void *arg)
> > {
> > struct xe_guc *guc = arg;
> > @@ -325,7 +340,11 @@ int xe_guc_submit_init(struct xe_guc *guc, unsigned int num_ids)
> > guc->submission_state.initialized = true;
> > - return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, guc_submit_fini, guc);
> > + err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, guc_submit_sw_fini, guc);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, guc_submit_fini, guc);
> > }
> > /*
> > @@ -2298,6 +2317,7 @@ static const struct xe_exec_queue_ops guc_exec_queue_ops = {
> > static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > {
> > struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
> > + bool do_destroy = false;
> > /* Stop scheduling + flush any DRM scheduler operations */
> > xe_sched_submission_stop(sched);
> > @@ -2305,7 +2325,7 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > /* Clean up lost G2H + reset engine state */
> > if (exec_queue_registered(q)) {
> > if (exec_queue_destroyed(q))
> > - __guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q);
> > + do_destroy = true;
> > }
> > if (q->guc->suspend_pending) {
> > set_exec_queue_suspended(q);
> > @@ -2341,18 +2361,15 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(q);
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + if (do_destroy)
> > + __guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q);
> > }
> > -int xe_guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > +static int guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > - if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc), vf_recovery(guc)))
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - if (!guc->submission_state.initialized)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > /*
> > * Using an atomic here rather than submission_state.lock as this
> > * function can be called while holding the CT lock (engine reset
> > @@ -2367,6 +2384,17 @@ int xe_guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > +int xe_guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > +{
> > + if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc), vf_recovery(guc)))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (!guc->submission_state.initialized)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return guc_submit_reset_prepare(guc);
> > +}
> > +
> > void xe_guc_submit_reset_wait(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > {
> > wait_event(guc->ct.wq, xe_device_wedged(guc_to_xe(guc)) ||
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 22:50 [PATCH v9 0/7] Attempt to fixup reset, wedge, unload corner cases Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] drm/xe: Always kill exec queues in xe_guc_submit_pause_abort Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] drm/xe: Forcefully tear down exec queues in GuC submit fini Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-11 16:34 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2026-03-13 18:48 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-03-13 20:30 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] drm/xe: Trigger queue cleanup if not in wedged mode 2 Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-11 16:33 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2026-03-13 18:49 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-13 20:31 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] drm/xe: Use XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG_NO_RESET enum instead of magic number Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] drm/xe/guc: Ensure CT state transitions via STOP before DISABLED Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] drm/xe/uc: Drop xe_guc_sanitize in favor of managed cleanup Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-13 22:53 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] drm/xe: Open-code GGTT MMIO access protection Zhanjun Dong
2026-03-10 22:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Attempt to fixup reset, wedge, unload corner cases Patchwork
2026-03-10 22:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-10 23:41 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-11 16:20 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abRb842rJCYXF3dK@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox