Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yadav, Arvind" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Mishra, Pallavi" <pallavi.mishra@intel.com>,
	"Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	"thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com"
	<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] drm/xe/uapi: Add UAPI support for purgeable buffer objects
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 15:02:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <350ad95d-0e88-4207-9f90-0c061ac80363@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90f98e02221b626eb0eb6fb5fb7986d1c10d1c52.camel@intel.com>


On 26-02-2026 23:28, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-02-11 at 20:56 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> From: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>>
>> Extend the DRM_XE_MADVISE ioctl to support purgeable buffer object
>> management by adding DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PURGEABLE_STATE attribute type.
>>
>> This allows userspace applications to provide memory usage hints to
>> the kernel for better memory management under pressure:
>>
>> - WILLNEED: Buffer is needed and should not be purged. If the BO was
>>    previously purged, retained field returns 0 indicating backing
>> store
>>    was lost (once purged, always purged semantics matching i915).
>>
>> - DONTNEED: Buffer is not currently needed and may be purged by the
>>    kernel under memory pressure to free resources. Only applies to
>>    non-shared BOs.
>>
>> The implementation includes a 'retained' output field (matching
>> i915's
>> drm_i915_gem_madvise.retained) that indicates whether the BO's
>> backing
>> store still exists (1) or has been purged (0).
>>
>> v2:
>>    - Add PURGED state for read-only status, change ioctl to DRM_IOWR,
>>      add retained field for i915 compatibility
>>
>> v3:
>>    - UAPI rule should not be changed (Matthew Brost)
>>    - Make 'retained' a userptr (Matthew Brost)
>>
>> v4:
>>    - You cannot make this part of the union (purge_state_val) larger
>>      than the existing union (16 bytes). So just drop the '__u64
>> reserved'
>>      field. (Matt)
>>
>> v5:
>>    - Update UAPI documentation to clarify retained must be initialized
>>      to 0(Thomas)
>>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray
>> <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 44
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> index 077e66a682e2..3e2f145e7f8f 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>> @@ -2099,6 +2099,7 @@ struct drm_xe_madvise {
>>   #define DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_PREFERRED_LOC	0
>>   #define DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_ATOMIC		1
>>   #define DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_PAT		2
>> +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PURGEABLE_STATE		3
>>   	/** @type: type of attribute */
>>   	__u32 type;
>>   
>> @@ -2189,6 +2190,49 @@ struct drm_xe_madvise {
>>   			/** @pat_index.reserved: Reserved */
>>   			__u64 reserved;
>>   		} pat_index;
>> +
>> +		/**
>> +		 * @purge_state_val: Purgeable state configuration
>> +		 *
>> +		 * Used when @type ==
>> DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PURGEABLE_STATE.
>> +		 *
>> +		 * Configures the purgeable state of buffer objects
>> in the specified
>> +		 * virtual address range. This allows applications
>> to hint to the kernel
>> +		 * about bo's usage patterns for better memory
>> management.
>> +		 *
>> +		 * Supported values for @purge_state_val.val:
>> +		 *  - DRM_XE_VMA_PURGEABLE_STATE_WILLNEED (0): Marks
>> BO as needed.
>> +		 *    If BO was purged, returns retained=0 (backing
>> store lost).
>> +		 *
>> +		 *  - DRM_XE_VMA_PURGEABLE_STATE_DONTNEED (1): Hints
>> that BO is not
>> +		 *    currently needed. Kernel may purge it under
>> memory pressure.
>> +		 *    Only applies to non-shared BOs. Returns
>> retained=1 if not purged.
>> +		 */
>> +		struct {
>> +#define DRM_XE_VMA_PURGEABLE_STATE_WILLNEED	0
>> +#define DRM_XE_VMA_PURGEABLE_STATE_DONTNEED	1
>> +			/** @purge_state_val.val: value for
>> DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PURGEABLE_STATE */
>> +			__u32 val;
>> +
>> +			/* @purge_state_val.pad */
>> +			__u32 pad;
>> +			/**
>> +			 * @purge_state_val.retained: Pointer to
>> output field for backing
>> +			 * store status.
>> +			 *
>> +			 * Userspace must initialize this field to 0
>> before the
>> +			 * ioctl. Kernel writes to it after the
>> operation:
>> +			 * - 1 if backing store exists (not purged)
>> +			 * - 0 if backing store was purged
>> +			 *
>> +			 * If userspace fails to initialize to 0,
>> ioctl returns -EINVAL.
>> +			 * This ensures a safe default (0 = assume
>> purged) if kernel
>> +			 * cannot write the result.
>> +			 *
>> +			 * Similar to i915's
>> drm_i915_gem_madvise.retained field.
>> +			 */
>> +			__u64 retained;
> why do you need a u32 pad and a u64? why not use pad and drop the last
> u64?


The __u64 retained field is a pointer to userspace memory where the 
kernel writes the output, not a direct value. Userspace pointers in uAPI 
must be __u64 to work on both 32-bit and 64-bit systems.

>
>> +		} purge_state_val;
>>   	};
> This is missing a new flag like
> DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_NO_COMPRESSION_HINT to tell UMDs if
> running Xe KMD has support for purgeable madvise.


I will add DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_PURGING for purgeable madivse 
support.

Thanks,
Arvind

>
>>   
>>   	/** @reserved: Reserved */

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-27  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-11 15:26 [PATCH v5 0/9] drm/xe/madvise: Add support for purgeable buffer objects Arvind Yadav
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] drm/xe/uapi: Add UAPI " Arvind Yadav
2026-02-24 10:50   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-26 17:58   ` Souza, Jose
2026-02-27  9:32     ` Yadav, Arvind [this message]
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] drm/xe/bo: Add purgeable bo state tracking and field madv to xe_bo Arvind Yadav
2026-02-11 16:00   ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] drm/xe/madvise: Implement purgeable buffer object support Arvind Yadav
2026-02-24 12:21   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-24 14:56     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] drm/xe/bo: Handle CPU faults on purged buffer objects Arvind Yadav
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] drm/xe/vm: Prevent binding of " Arvind Yadav
2026-02-11 16:17   ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] drm/xe/madvise: Implement per-VMA purgeable state tracking Arvind Yadav
2026-02-24 12:48   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-24 15:07     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-02-24 16:36       ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-25  5:35         ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-02-25  8:21           ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-25  9:04             ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-25  9:18               ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-25  9:40                 ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-02-25 18:32                   ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] drm/xe/madvise: Block imported and exported dma-bufs Arvind Yadav
2026-02-24 14:15   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] drm/xe/bo: Add purgeable shrinker state helpers Arvind Yadav
2026-02-24 14:21   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-24 15:09     ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-02-11 15:26 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] drm/xe/madvise: Enable purgeable buffer object IOCTL support Arvind Yadav
2026-02-11 15:40   ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-11 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] drm/xe/madvise: Add support for purgeable buffer objects Matthew Brost
2026-02-25 10:10   ` Yadav, Arvind
2026-02-11 16:21 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/madvise: Add support for purgeable buffer objects (rev6) Patchwork
2026-02-11 16:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-02-11 17:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-02-13  1:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=350ad95d-0e88-4207-9f90-0c061ac80363@intel.com \
    --to=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=pallavi.mishra@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox