Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/display: add pme_capable() to the parent interface

["Govindapillai, Vinod" <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>]

On Mon, 2026-08-17 at 13:19 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, Vinod Govindapillai
> <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> wrote:
> > Add a provision to query the optional pme_capability to the parent
> > interface so that it could be called independently from xe or i915
> > based on the implementation.
> 
> But do we need this? Display has all the information to call
> pci_dev_run_wake() directly, without going through the parent
> interface.
> 
> The only difference is this is not being set up for i915.

Ok. Yeah pci_dev_run_wake() should handle this properly. But because
the platform support for the pme is added from NVL, I thought of this
approach. 

So you are suggesting something like this?

if (pci_dev_run_wake()), avoid start HPD polling directly in the 
intel_display_driver::intel_display_driver_pm_runtime_suspend()?

Or use a wrapper to check the pme_capability.

BR
Vinod 

> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> > 
> > Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-5
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c | 7 +++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h | 1 +
> >  include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h     | 1 +
> >  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> > index 0a331f89b4db..73d85384474e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ bool intel_display_rpm_suspended(struct
> > intel_display *display)
> >  	return display->parent->rpm->suspended(display->drm);
> >  }
> >  
> > +bool intel_display_rpm_pme_capable(struct intel_display *display)
> > +{
> > +	const struct intel_display_rpm_interface *rpm = display-
> > >parent->rpm;
> > +
> > +	return rpm->pme_capable && rpm->pme_capable(display->drm);
> > +}
> > +
> >  void assert_display_rpm_held(struct intel_display *display)
> >  {
> >  	display->parent->rpm->assert_held(display->drm);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> > index 6ef48515f84b..2d4071fb9282 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rpm.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ void intel_display_rpm_put(struct intel_display
> > *display, struct ref_tracker *wa
> >  
> >  /* Only for special cases. */
> >  bool intel_display_rpm_suspended(struct intel_display *display);
> > +bool intel_display_rpm_pme_capable(struct intel_display *display);
> >  
> >  void assert_display_rpm_held(struct intel_display *display);
> >  void intel_display_rpm_assert_block(struct intel_display
> > *display);
> > diff --git a/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> > b/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> > index d7d06dcaa699..563de403b102 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h
> > @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct intel_display_rpm_interface {
> >  	void (*put_unchecked)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> >  
> >  	bool (*suspended)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> > +	bool (*pme_capable)(const struct drm_device *drm); /*
> > Optional */
> >  	void (*assert_held)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> >  	void (*assert_block)(const struct drm_device *drm);
> >  	void (*assert_unblock)(const struct drm_device *drm);
>