From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: convert DP test debugfs to struct intel_display
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:56:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d29cf43c7067e910fdf1127afcc35dd558b4b0b.1726833193.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1726833193.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
Prefer struct intel_display over struct drm_i915_private. Do some
drive-by logging conversions to kms category.
Observe that i915_displayport_test_active_write() was using the wrong
type for m->private, but it has worked because struct drm_i915_private
has struct drm_device at offset 0.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_test.c | 25 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_test.c
index f086f6854bf0..8426c8ef947e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_test.c
@@ -514,16 +514,15 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
const char __user *ubuf,
size_t len, loff_t *offp)
{
+ struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
+ struct intel_display *display = m->private;
char *input_buffer;
int status = 0;
- struct drm_device *dev;
struct drm_connector *connector;
struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
int val = 0;
- dev = ((struct seq_file *)file->private_data)->private;
-
if (len == 0)
return 0;
@@ -531,9 +530,9 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
if (IS_ERR(input_buffer))
return PTR_ERR(input_buffer);
- drm_dbg(dev, "Copied %d bytes from user\n", (unsigned int)len);
+ drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Copied %d bytes from user\n", (unsigned int)len);
- drm_connector_list_iter_begin(dev, &conn_iter);
+ drm_connector_list_iter_begin(display->drm, &conn_iter);
drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
@@ -550,7 +549,7 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
status = kstrtoint(input_buffer, 10, &val);
if (status < 0)
break;
- drm_dbg(dev, "Got %d for test active\n", val);
+ drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Got %d for test active\n", val);
/* To prevent erroneous activation of the compliance
* testing code, only accept an actual value of 1 here
*/
@@ -571,12 +570,12 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
static int i915_displayport_test_active_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = m->private;
+ struct intel_display *display = m->private;
struct drm_connector *connector;
struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
- drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&dev_priv->drm, &conn_iter);
+ drm_connector_list_iter_begin(display->drm, &conn_iter);
drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
@@ -621,12 +620,12 @@ static const struct file_operations i915_displayport_test_active_fops = {
static int i915_displayport_test_data_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = m->private;
+ struct intel_display *display = m->private;
struct drm_connector *connector;
struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
- drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&dev_priv->drm, &conn_iter);
+ drm_connector_list_iter_begin(display->drm, &conn_iter);
drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
@@ -675,12 +674,12 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_displayport_test_data);
static int i915_displayport_test_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = m->private;
+ struct intel_display *display = m->private;
struct drm_connector *connector;
struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
- drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&dev_priv->drm, &conn_iter);
+ drm_connector_list_iter_begin(display->drm, &conn_iter);
drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
@@ -723,7 +722,7 @@ void intel_dp_test_debugfs_register(struct intel_display *display)
debugfs_create_file(intel_display_debugfs_files[i].name,
0644,
minor->debugfs_root,
- to_i915(minor->dev),
+ display,
intel_display_debugfs_files[i].fops);
}
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-20 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 11:56 [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915/dp: clean up DP testing Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/dp: split out intel_dp_test.[ch] to a dedicated file Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/dp: fix style issues in intel_dp_test.c Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 11:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dp: convert intel_dp_test.c struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 11:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dp: clean up intel_dp_test.[ch] interface Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 11:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dp: move DP test debugfs files next to the functionality Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 11:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dp: fix style issues in DP test debugfs Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 11:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/display: remove the loop in fifo underrun debugfs file creation Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 11:56 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-09-20 11:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dp: add intel_dp_test_reset() and intel_dp_test_short_pulse() Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 12:06 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp: clean up DP testing Patchwork
2024-09-20 12:07 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-20 12:08 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-20 12:31 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 12:33 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 12:34 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-20 12:58 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 0/9] " Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 7:33 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 16:19 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d29cf43c7067e910fdf1127afcc35dd558b4b0b.1726833193.git.jani.nikula@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox