From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/xe/pf: Prepare for new threshold KLVs
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 10:28:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <597fa916-0e3f-482c-a237-8211be2aec12@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251215143739.196336-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On 12/15/2025 6:37 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> We want to extend our macro-based KLV list definitions with new
> information about the version from which given KLV is supported.
> Prepare our code generators to emit dedicated version check if
> a KLV was defined with the version information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> #v1
My r-b stands.
Daniele
> ---
> v2: rebased after patch split, use new macro
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c | 9 ++++++---
> .../drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_thresholds_set_types.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> index 59c5c6b4d994..6e8507c24986 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,8 @@ static u32 encode_config_ggtt(u32 *cfg, const struct xe_gt_sriov_config *config,
> }
>
> /* Return: number of configuration dwords written */
> -static u32 encode_config(u32 *cfg, const struct xe_gt_sriov_config *config, bool details)
> +static u32 encode_config(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 *cfg, const struct xe_gt_sriov_config *config,
> + bool details)
> {
> u32 n = 0;
>
> @@ -303,9 +304,11 @@ static u32 encode_config(u32 *cfg, const struct xe_gt_sriov_config *config, bool
> cfg[n++] = PREP_GUC_KLV_TAG(VF_CFG_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT);
> cfg[n++] = config->preempt_timeout;
>
> -#define encode_threshold_config(TAG, ...) ({ \
> - cfg[n++] = PREP_GUC_KLV_TAG(VF_CFG_THRESHOLD_##TAG); \
> - cfg[n++] = config->thresholds[MAKE_XE_GUC_KLV_THRESHOLD_INDEX(TAG)]; \
> +#define encode_threshold_config(TAG, NAME, VER...) ({ \
> + if (IF_ARGS(GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST(>->uc.guc, VER), true, VER)) { \
> + cfg[n++] = PREP_GUC_KLV_TAG(VF_CFG_THRESHOLD_##TAG); \
> + cfg[n++] = config->thresholds[MAKE_XE_GUC_KLV_THRESHOLD_INDEX(TAG)]; \
> + } \
> });
>
> MAKE_XE_GUC_KLV_THRESHOLDS_SET(encode_threshold_config);
> @@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ static int pf_push_full_vf_config(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid)
> return -ENOBUFS;
>
> cfg = xe_guc_buf_cpu_ptr(buf);
> - num_dwords = encode_config(cfg, config, true);
> + num_dwords = encode_config(gt, cfg, config, true);
> xe_gt_assert(gt, num_dwords <= max_cfg_dwords);
>
> if (xe_gt_is_media_type(gt)) {
> @@ -2518,7 +2521,7 @@ ssize_t xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_save(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid, void *bu
> ret = -ENOBUFS;
> } else {
> config = pf_pick_vf_config(gt, vfid);
> - ret = encode_config(buf, config, false) * sizeof(u32);
> + ret = encode_config(gt, buf, config, false) * sizeof(u32);
> }
> }
> mutex_unlock(xe_gt_sriov_pf_master_mutex(gt));
> @@ -2551,11 +2554,13 @@ static int pf_restore_vf_config_klv(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid,
> return pf_provision_preempt_timeout(gt, vfid, value[0]);
>
> /* auto-generate case statements */
> -#define define_threshold_key_to_provision_case(TAG, ...) \
> +#define define_threshold_key_to_provision_case(TAG, NAME, VER...) \
> case MAKE_GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_THRESHOLD_KEY(TAG): \
> BUILD_BUG_ON(MAKE_GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_THRESHOLD_LEN(TAG) != 1u); \
> if (len != MAKE_GUC_KLV_VF_CFG_THRESHOLD_LEN(TAG)) \
> return -EBADMSG; \
> + if (IF_ARGS(!GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST(>->uc.guc, VER), false, VER)) \
> + return -EKEYREJECTED; \
> return pf_provision_threshold(gt, vfid, \
> MAKE_XE_GUC_KLV_THRESHOLD_INDEX(TAG), \
> value[0]);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
> index 0fd863609848..ece9eed5d7c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_monitor.h"
> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h"
> #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_service.h"
> +#include "xe_guc.h"
> #include "xe_pm.h"
> #include "xe_sriov_pf.h"
> #include "xe_sriov_pf_provision.h"
> @@ -301,9 +302,11 @@ static void pf_add_config_attrs(struct xe_gt *gt, struct dentry *parent, unsigne
> &sched_priority_fops);
>
> /* register all threshold attributes */
> -#define register_threshold_attribute(TAG, NAME, ...) \
> - debugfs_create_file_unsafe("threshold_" #NAME, 0644, parent, parent, \
> - &NAME##_fops);
> +#define register_threshold_attribute(TAG, NAME, VER...) ({ \
> + if (IF_ARGS(GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST(>->uc.guc, VER), true, VER)) \
> + debugfs_create_file_unsafe("threshold_" #NAME, 0644, parent, parent, \
> + &NAME##_fops); \
> +});
> MAKE_XE_GUC_KLV_THRESHOLDS_SET(register_threshold_attribute)
> #undef register_threshold_attribute
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_thresholds_set_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_thresholds_set_types.h
> index 0a028c94756d..5f84da3d10d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_thresholds_set_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_klv_thresholds_set_types.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
> * ABI and the associated &NAME, that may be used in code or debugfs/sysfs::
> *
> * define(TAG, NAME)
> + *
> + * If required, KLVs can be labeled with GuC firmware version that added them::
> + *
> + * define(TAG, NAME, MAJOR, MINOR)
> + * define(TAG, NAME, MAJOR, MINOR, PATCH)
> */
> #define MAKE_XE_GUC_KLV_THRESHOLDS_SET(define) \
> define(CAT_ERR, cat_error_count) \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 14:37 [PATCH v2 0/4] PF: Add handling for new adverse event thresholds Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/xe: Introduce IF_ARGS macro utility Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 15:50 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Introduce GUC_FIRMWARE_VER_AT_LEAST helper Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 17:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 18:25 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-12-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/xe/pf: Prepare for new threshold KLVs Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 18:28 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2025-12-15 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/xe/pf: Add handling for MLRC adverse event threshold Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-15 14:57 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for PF: Add handling for new adverse event thresholds (rev2) Patchwork
2025-12-15 14:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-15 16:03 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-15 19:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-12-16 1:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] PF: Add handling for new adverse event thresholds Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=597fa916-0e3f-482c-a237-8211be2aec12@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox