From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/32] drm/xe/vm: Update xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops to take an increment value
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:39:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6381a01c-aff6-4e16-a5bc-d889e688bf1d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aABG9l2fSSBIKHYI@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>
On 17-04-2025 05:40, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 03:46:53PM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
>> Prefetch for SVM ranges can have more than one operation to increment,
>> hence modify the function to accept an increment value as input.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Call xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops only once for REMAP (Matthew Brost)
>> - Add check for 0 ops
>>
>> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> index 0c69ef6b5ec5..4d215c55a778 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>> @@ -806,13 +806,16 @@ static void xe_vma_ops_fini(struct xe_vma_ops *vops)
>> kfree(vops->pt_update_ops[i].ops);
>> }
>>
>> -static void xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(struct xe_vma_ops *vops, u8 tile_mask)
>> +static void xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(struct xe_vma_ops *vops, u8 tile_mask, u8 inc_val)
>
> s/u8 inc_val/int inc_val
>
> or maybe u32?
>
> Just debugged a problem which the compute UMD + prefetch where the
> inc_val was 256, thus 0, so the binding step was skipped for prefetch.
Thanks for pointing this. I tested with prefetch up to 256 MiB hence
missed it. >
>
>
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> + if(!inc_val)
>> + return;
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < XE_MAX_TILES_PER_DEVICE; ++i)
>> if (BIT(i) & tile_mask)
>> - ++vops->pt_update_ops[i].num_ops;
>> + vops->pt_update_ops[i].num_ops += inc_val;
>> }
>>
>> static void xe_vm_populate_rebind(struct xe_vma_op *op, struct xe_vma *vma,
>> @@ -842,7 +845,7 @@ static int xe_vm_ops_add_rebind(struct xe_vma_ops *vops, struct xe_vma *vma,
>>
>> xe_vm_populate_rebind(op, vma, tile_mask);
>> list_add_tail(&op->link, &vops->list);
>> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, tile_mask);
>> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, tile_mask, 1);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -977,7 +980,7 @@ xe_vm_ops_add_range_rebind(struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
>>
>> xe_vm_populate_range_rebind(op, vma, range, tile_mask);
>> list_add_tail(&op->link, &vops->list);
>> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, tile_mask);
>> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, tile_mask, 1);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -1062,7 +1065,7 @@ xe_vm_ops_add_range_unbind(struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
>>
>> xe_vm_populate_range_unbind(op, range);
>> list_add_tail(&op->link, &vops->list);
>> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, range->tile_present);
>> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, range->tile_present, 1);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -2493,7 +2496,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
>> !op->map.is_cpu_addr_mirror) ||
>> op->map.invalidate_on_bind)
>> xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops,
>> - op->tile_mask);
>> + op->tile_mask, 1);
>> break;
>> }
>> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_REMAP:
>> @@ -2502,6 +2505,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
>> gpuva_to_vma(op->base.remap.unmap->va);
>> bool skip = xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(old);
>> u64 start = xe_vma_start(old), end = xe_vma_end(old);
>> + u8 num_remap_ops = 0;
>
> u8 actually works here as the max value is 3 but I'd change this to a
> u32 or int.
>
sure will use int.
> Otherwise LGTM.
>
> Matt
>
>>
>> if (op->base.remap.prev)
>> start = op->base.remap.prev->va.addr +
>> @@ -2554,7 +2558,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
>> (ULL)op->remap.start,
>> (ULL)op->remap.range);
>> } else {
>> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
>> + num_remap_ops++;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2583,11 +2587,13 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
>> (ULL)op->remap.start,
>> (ULL)op->remap.range);
>> } else {
>> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
>> + num_remap_ops++;
>> }
>> }
>> if (!skip)
>> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
>> + num_remap_ops++;
>> +
>> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask, num_remap_ops);
>> break;
>> }
>> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_UNMAP:
>> @@ -2599,7 +2605,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
>> return -EBUSY;
>>
>> if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma))
>> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
>> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask, 1);
>> break;
>> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_PREFETCH:
>> vma = gpuva_to_vma(op->base.prefetch.va);
>> @@ -2611,7 +2617,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
>> }
>>
>> if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma))
>> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
>> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask, 1);
>> break;
>> default:
>> drm_warn(&vm->xe->drm, "NOT POSSIBLE");
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-21 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 10:16 [PATCH v2 00/32] PREFETCH and MADVISE for SVM ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 01/32] drm/xe: Introduce xe_vma_op_prefetch_range struct for prefetch of ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/32] drm/xe: Make xe_svm_alloc_vram public Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 2:50 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:06 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/32] drm/xe/svm: Helper to add tile masks to svm ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/32] drm/xe/svm: Make to_xe_range a public function Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/32] drm/xe/svm: Make xe_svm_range_* end/start/size public Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/32] drm/xe/vm: Update xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops to take an increment value Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 0:10 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:09 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/32] drm/xe/vm: Add an identifier in xe_vma_ops for svm prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 2:53 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/32] drm/xe: Rename lookup_vma function to xe_find_vma_by_addr Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 22:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 09/32] drm/xe/svm: Allow unaligned addresses and ranges for prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 2:53 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/32] drm/xe/svm: Refactor usage of drm_gpusvm* function in xe_svm Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 2:57 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:30 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/32] drm/xe/svm: Add function to determine if range needs VRAM migration Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 3:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:52 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/32] drm/gpusvm: Introduce vram_only flag for VRAM allocation Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 3:07 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:55 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 13/32] drm/xe/svm: Incase of atomic access ensure get_pages happens from vram Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 4:19 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:58 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-21 6:29 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-22 15:25 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 15:27 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 14/32] drm/xe/svm: Implement prefetch support for SVM ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 4:54 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-24 10:03 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-24 23:48 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-28 6:44 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 15/32] drm/xe/vm: Add debug prints for SVM range prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 4:56 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 16/32] Introduce drm_gpuvm_sm_map_ops_flags enums for sm_map_ops Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-05-26 13:48 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 22:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 17/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add madvise interface Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 18:19 ` Souza, Jose
2025-04-17 18:24 ` Souza, Jose
2025-04-22 15:34 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 15:55 ` Souza, Jose
2025-04-22 16:19 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 15:40 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 16:02 ` Souza, Jose
2025-04-22 16:12 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 16:16 ` Souza, Jose
2025-05-02 14:00 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-05-20 8:13 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-20 8:49 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 18/32] drm/xe/vm: Add attributes struct as member of vma Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 18:36 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 9:27 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-27 17:37 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-28 5:33 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-28 16:09 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-28 16:16 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 19/32] drm/xe/vma: Move pat_index to vma attributes Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 18:37 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 20/32] drm/xe/vma: Modify new_vma to accept struct xe_vma_mem_attr as parameter Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-13 2:36 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-14 18:40 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 9:28 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 21/32] drm/gpusvm: Make drm_gpusvm_for_each_* macros public Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-08 1:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-14 18:47 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 22/32] drm/xe/svm: Split system allocator vma incase of madvise call Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 19:01 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 9:46 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-14 19:02 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 23/32] drm/xe: Implement madvise ioctl for xe Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 10:15 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-28 5:22 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 24/32] drm/xe: Allow CPU address mirror VMA unbind with gpu bindings for madvise Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 19:20 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 10:21 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-27 17:32 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 25/32] drm/xe/svm : Add svm ranges migration policy on atomic access Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 22:21 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 10:22 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 26/32] drm/xe/madvise: Update migration policy based on preferred location Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 22:04 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 8:50 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-21 16:51 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 27/32] drm/xe/svm: Support DRM_XE_SVM_ATTR_PAT memory attribute Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:52 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 8:51 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 28/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add flag for consulting madvise hints on svm prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 8:52 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 29/32] drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 22:17 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 30/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add uapi for vma count and mem attributes Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:08 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 8:54 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-28 16:18 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 31/32] drm/xe/bo: Add attributes field to xe_bo Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:10 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 32/32] drm/xe/bo: Update atomic_access attribute on madvise Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 22:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 9:13 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 14:07 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for PREFETCH and MADVISE for SVM ranges (rev3) Patchwork
2025-04-07 14:07 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-07 14:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-07 14:12 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for PREFETCH and MADVISE for SVM ranges (rev4) Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:11 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:12 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:29 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:31 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:32 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-09 7:00 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6381a01c-aff6-4e16-a5bc-d889e688bf1d@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox