From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/32] drm/xe/svm: Add function to determine if range needs VRAM migration
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:05:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aABv/vgb7v3ixrkX@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407101719.3350996-12-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 03:46:58PM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> xe_svm_range_needs_migrate_to_vram() determines whether range needs
> migration to vram or not, for pagefault try at least once.
>
So I pulled this patch into requested series to minimally enable atomic
on the existing upstream code here [1]. I suspect we will get my series
in first, perhaps even in the 6.15 cycle as I think it could reasonably
justified as a fixes series as the compute UMD doesn't really work
without it. Just a heads up.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/647159/?series=146290&rev=4
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h | 10 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> index 8cd35553a927..f4ae3feaf9d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> @@ -709,6 +709,51 @@ int xe_svm_alloc_vram(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_tile *tile,
> }
> #endif
>
> +static bool supports_4K_migration(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + if (xe->info.platform == XE_BATTLEMAGE)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
if (xe->info.vram_flags & XE_VRAM_FLAGS_NEED64K)
return false;
return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_svm_range_needs_migrate_to_vram() - SVM range needs migrate to VRAM or not
> + * @range: SVM range for which migration needs to be decided
> + * @vma: vma which has range
> + * @region: default placement for range
> + *
> + * Return: True for range needing migration and migration is supported else false
> + */
> +bool xe_svm_range_needs_migrate_to_vram(struct xe_svm_range *range, struct xe_vma *vma,
> + u32 region)
> +{
> + struct xe_vm *vm = range_to_vm(&range->base);
> + u64 range_size = xe_svm_range_size(range);
> + bool needs_migrate = false;
> +
> + if (!range->base.flags.migrate_devmem)
> + return false;
> +
> + needs_migrate = region;
> +
> + if (needs_migrate && !IS_DGFX(vm->xe)) {
> + drm_warn(&vm->xe->drm, "Platform doesn't support VRAM\n");
> + return false;
> + }
I'm not sure if this warrents a drm_warn, I think an assert would be
better here as it shouldn't happen unless we have an internal
programming error.
Matt
> +
> + if (needs_migrate && xe_svm_range_in_vram(range)) {
> + drm_info(&vm->xe->drm, "Range is already in VRAM\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (needs_migrate && range_size <= SZ_64K && !supports_4K_migration(vm->xe)) {
> + drm_warn(&vm->xe->drm, "Platform doesn't support SZ_4K range migration\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return needs_migrate;
> +}
>
> /**
> * xe_svm_handle_pagefault() - SVM handle page fault
> @@ -763,8 +808,8 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma *vma,
> range_debug(range, "PAGE FAULT");
>
> /* XXX: Add migration policy, for now migrate range once */
> - if (!range->skip_migrate && range->base.flags.migrate_devmem &&
> - xe_svm_range_size(range) >= SZ_64K) {
> + if (!range->skip_migrate &&
> + xe_svm_range_needs_migrate_to_vram(range, vma, IS_DGFX(vm->xe))) {
A little odd to pass IS_DGFX(vm->xe) as the region...
> range->skip_migrate = true;
>
> err = xe_svm_alloc_vram(vm, tile, range, &ctx);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> index 9c4c3aeacc6c..d5be8229ca7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ struct xe_svm_range *xe_svm_range_find_or_insert(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 addr,
> int xe_svm_range_get_pages(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_svm_range *range,
> struct drm_gpusvm_ctx *ctx);
>
> +bool xe_svm_range_needs_migrate_to_vram(struct xe_svm_range *range, struct xe_vma *vma,
> + u32 region);
> +
> /**
> * xe_svm_range_has_dma_mapping() - SVM range has DMA mapping
> * @range: SVM range
> @@ -281,6 +284,13 @@ static inline unsigned long xe_svm_range_size(struct xe_svm_range *range)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline
> +bool xe_svm_range_needs_migrate_to_vram(struct xe_svm_range *range, struct xe_vma *vma,
> + u32 region)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> #define xe_svm_assert_in_notifier(...) do {} while (0)
> #define xe_svm_range_has_dma_mapping(...) false
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 10:16 [PATCH v2 00/32] PREFETCH and MADVISE for SVM ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 01/32] drm/xe: Introduce xe_vma_op_prefetch_range struct for prefetch of ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/32] drm/xe: Make xe_svm_alloc_vram public Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 2:50 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:06 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/32] drm/xe/svm: Helper to add tile masks to svm ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/32] drm/xe/svm: Make to_xe_range a public function Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/32] drm/xe/svm: Make xe_svm_range_* end/start/size public Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/32] drm/xe/vm: Update xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops to take an increment value Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 0:10 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:09 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/32] drm/xe/vm: Add an identifier in xe_vma_ops for svm prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 2:53 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/32] drm/xe: Rename lookup_vma function to xe_find_vma_by_addr Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 22:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 09/32] drm/xe/svm: Allow unaligned addresses and ranges for prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 2:53 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/32] drm/xe/svm: Refactor usage of drm_gpusvm* function in xe_svm Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 2:57 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:30 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/32] drm/xe/svm: Add function to determine if range needs VRAM migration Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 3:05 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-04-21 4:52 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/32] drm/gpusvm: Introduce vram_only flag for VRAM allocation Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 3:07 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:55 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 13/32] drm/xe/svm: Incase of atomic access ensure get_pages happens from vram Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 4:19 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-21 4:58 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-21 6:29 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-22 15:25 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 15:27 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 14/32] drm/xe/svm: Implement prefetch support for SVM ranges Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 4:54 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-24 10:03 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-24 23:48 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-28 6:44 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 15/32] drm/xe/vm: Add debug prints for SVM range prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 4:56 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 16/32] Introduce drm_gpuvm_sm_map_ops_flags enums for sm_map_ops Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-07 10:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2025-05-26 13:48 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 22:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 17/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add madvise interface Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-17 18:19 ` Souza, Jose
2025-04-17 18:24 ` Souza, Jose
2025-04-22 15:34 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 15:55 ` Souza, Jose
2025-04-22 16:19 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 15:40 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 16:02 ` Souza, Jose
2025-04-22 16:12 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-22 16:16 ` Souza, Jose
2025-05-02 14:00 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-05-20 8:13 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-20 8:49 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 18/32] drm/xe/vm: Add attributes struct as member of vma Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 18:36 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 9:27 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-27 17:37 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-28 5:33 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-28 16:09 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-28 16:16 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 19/32] drm/xe/vma: Move pat_index to vma attributes Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 18:37 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 20/32] drm/xe/vma: Modify new_vma to accept struct xe_vma_mem_attr as parameter Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-13 2:36 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-14 18:40 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 9:28 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 21/32] drm/gpusvm: Make drm_gpusvm_for_each_* macros public Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-04-08 1:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-14 18:47 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 22/32] drm/xe/svm: Split system allocator vma incase of madvise call Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 19:01 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 9:46 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-14 19:02 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 23/32] drm/xe: Implement madvise ioctl for xe Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 10:15 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-28 5:22 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 24/32] drm/xe: Allow CPU address mirror VMA unbind with gpu bindings for madvise Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 19:20 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 10:21 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-27 17:32 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 25/32] drm/xe/svm : Add svm ranges migration policy on atomic access Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 22:21 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-20 10:22 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 26/32] drm/xe/madvise: Update migration policy based on preferred location Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 22:04 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 8:50 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-21 16:51 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 27/32] drm/xe/svm: Support DRM_XE_SVM_ATTR_PAT memory attribute Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:52 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 8:51 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 28/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add flag for consulting madvise hints on svm prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 8:52 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 29/32] drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 22:17 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 30/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add uapi for vma count and mem attributes Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:08 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 8:54 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-05-28 16:18 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 31/32] drm/xe/bo: Add attributes field to xe_bo Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 21:10 ` Matthew Brost
2025-04-07 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 32/32] drm/xe/bo: Update atomic_access attribute on madvise Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-05-14 22:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-05-21 9:13 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-04-07 14:07 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for PREFETCH and MADVISE for SVM ranges (rev3) Patchwork
2025-04-07 14:07 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-07 14:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-07 14:12 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for PREFETCH and MADVISE for SVM ranges (rev4) Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:11 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:12 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:29 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:31 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:32 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-09 5:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-09 7:00 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aABv/vgb7v3ixrkX@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox