Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
To: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>,
	"Brian Welty" <brian.welty@intel.com>,
	Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>, Jose Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Michal Mrozek <michal.mrozek@intel.com>,
	Oak Zeng <oak.zeng@intel.com>,
	Thomas Hellstr_m <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Refactor default device atomic settings
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 11:54:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e379db6-3b3d-4129-8254-29ed548408d5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fbb932b-9525-4fce-9376-30f422da703d@intel.com>

Hi Lionel,

On 5/3/2024 11:47 AM, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> Hi Nirmoy,
>
> I've updated our Mesa MR for this : 
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/28823
>
> But then I started to wonder if we needed to do anything at all with 
> this v6.

No, there is nothing to do for traditional APIs.


> The only scenario I'm not sure about is this : a BO is created with 2 
> placements LMEM+SMEM. When Xe migrates the BO from LMEM to SMEM due to 
> LMEM pressure, does it set AE bit in the PTE?
> And then if promoted back to LMEM, is the PTE config DM=1 and AE=0 again?


For traditional API( not using fault/LR VM) then both backend will have 
AE=1, so on LMEM pressure if the buffer is backed by SMEM, it will have 
AE=1 as well.


Regards,

Nirmoy

>
> Thanks,
>
> -Lionel
>
> On 30/04/2024 19:25, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>> The default behavior of device atomics depends on the
>> VM type and buffer allocation types. Device atomics are
>> expected to function with all types of allocations for
>> traditional applications/APIs. Additionally, in compute/SVM
>> API scenarios with fault mode or LR mode VMs, device atomics
>> must work with single-region allocations. In all other cases
>> device atomics should be disabled by default. PVC needs special
>> care as it doesn't support device atomics on SMEM.
>>
>> v6: Only check LR mode to determine compute API as fault
>>      mode requires LR mode(Jose)
>>      Set AE=1 on SMEM+LMEM allocation when a buffer is migrated
>>      to LMEM from SMEM(Brian)
>>
>> v5: Fix broken atomics on PVC from v4 changes.
>>
>> v4: Previous assumption that device atomics should be disabled
>>      by default on SMEM only BO was wrong as traditional applications
>>      will not use such allocations for CPU atomics. So remove the
>>      VM bind flag and the query uAPI and instead refactor default device
>>      atomics settings as per VM type and buffer allocations.
>>
>>
>> v3: Capture ret value of xe_vm_bind_ioctl_validate_bo(Matt B).
>>      Remove redundant coh_mode param from 
>> xe_vm_bind_ioctl_validate_bo().
>>      Remove has_device_atomics_on_smem from xe_graphics_desc(Jose).
>>      Replace DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_SUPP_DEV_ATOMIC_ON_SMEM with
>>      config flag DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_DEV_ATOMIC_ON_SMEM(Jose).
>>      Mention that PTE_AE will not be applied to userptr(Matt R)
>>
>> v2: Add BO helper func in xe_vm_bind_ioctl()(Matt B).
>>      Use XE_IOCTL_DBG for checks(Matt B).
>>      Move platform checks with help of adding flags in
>>      intel_device_info(Matt B).
>>      Add document for DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_DEVICE_ATOMICS(Matt B).
>>      Create query uAPI for this newly added VM bind flag(Jose, Lionel).
>>
>> Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
>> Cc: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
>> Cc: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jose Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lionel G Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Mrozek <michal.mrozek@intel.com>
>> Cc: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellstr_m <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Nirmoy Das (5):
>>    drm/xe: Introduce has_atomic_enable_pte_bit device info
>>    drm/xe: Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function
>>    drm/xe: Introduce has_device_atomics_on_smem device info
>>    drm/xe: Add function to check if BO has single placement
>>    drm/xe: Refactor default device atomic settings
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c           | 14 +++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h           |  1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h |  4 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c          |  5 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h    |  1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c           | 37 +++++++++++--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c           | 79 ++++++++++++++++------------
>>   7 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-30 16:25 [PATCH v6 0/5] Refactor default device atomic settings Nirmoy Das
2024-04-30 16:25 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_atomic_enable_pte_bit device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-30 16:25 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/xe: Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function Nirmoy Das
2024-04-30 16:25 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_device_atomics_on_smem device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-30 16:25 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/xe: Add function to check if BO has single placement Nirmoy Das
2024-04-30 16:25 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] drm/xe: Refactor default device atomic settings Nirmoy Das
2024-05-03 15:39   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-05-03 16:00     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-05-03 16:11       ` Zeng, Oak
2024-05-03 16:30         ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-30 18:47 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Refactor default device atomic settings (rev6) Patchwork
2024-04-30 18:48 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-30 18:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-30 19:00 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-30 19:03 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-30 19:04 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-30 19:28 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-04-30 22:20 ` ✓ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-05-03  9:47 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Refactor default device atomic settings Lionel Landwerlin
2024-05-03  9:54   ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-05-06  7:13     ` Lionel Landwerlin
2024-05-06  9:25       ` Lionel Landwerlin
2024-05-06 16:21 ` Nirmoy Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e379db6-3b3d-4129-8254-29ed548408d5@intel.com \
    --to=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com \
    --cc=brian.welty@intel.com \
    --cc=fei.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.mrozek@intel.com \
    --cc=oak.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox