From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/psr: Set plane id bit in crtc_state->async_flip_planes for PSR
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 07:09:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f912f8907477fa8335984eafc16cd0ed2ededdb.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTA4BTe4I5sA-WSJ@intel.com>
On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 15:15 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 03:24:55PM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > Currently plane id bit is set in crtc_state->async_flip_planes only
> > when
> > async flip toggle workaround is needed. We want to utilize
> > crtc_state->async_flip_planes further in Selective Fetch
> > calculation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c
> > index 7b7619d59251..de0a69c55582 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c
> > @@ -603,8 +603,7 @@ static int
> > intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *old_cr
> > if (intel_plane_do_async_flip(plane, old_crtc_state,
> > new_crtc_state)) {
> > new_crtc_state->do_async_flip = true;
> > new_crtc_state->async_flip_planes |= BIT(plane-
> > >id);
> > - } else if (plane->need_async_flip_toggle_wa &&
> > - new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
> > + } else if (new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
>
> I'd get rid of the if-else construct here now, and just do something
> like:
>
> if (intel_plane_do_async_flip(...))
> new_crtc_state->do_async_flip = true;
>
> if (new_crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
> /* ... */
> new_crtc_state->async_flip_planes |= BIT(plane->id);
> }
>
> We should probably also move the plane->async_flip check
> out from intel_plane_do_async_flip() and just make it a
> drm_WARN_ON(..., uapi.async_flip && !plane->async_flip).
> But that's probably better left for a separate patch.
Sent new version, please check. Left out this drm_WARN_ON change. I
will send it afterwards.
BR,
Jouni Högander
>
> > /*
> > * On platforms with double buffered async flip
> > bit we
> > * set the bit already one frame early during the
> > sync
> > @@ -612,6 +611,13 @@ static int
> > intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *old_cr
> > * hardware will therefore be ready to perform a
> > real
> > * async flip during the next commit, without
> > having
> > * to wait yet another frame for the bit to latch.
> > + *
> > + * async_flip_planes bitmask is also used by
> > selective
> > + * fetch calculation to continue full frame
> > updates as
> > + * long as there may be pending async flip on any
> > + * plane which is part of selective
> > + * update. I.e. old_crtc_state->async_flip_planes
> > &
> > + * BIT(<plane in su area>->id).
> > */
> > new_crtc_state->async_flip_planes |= BIT(plane-
> > >id);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-04 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 13:24 [PATCH v3 0/3] Selective Fetch and async flip Jouni Högander
2025-12-01 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/psr: Set plane id bit in crtc_state->async_flip_planes for PSR Jouni Högander
2025-12-03 13:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-12-04 7:09 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-12-16 8:38 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-01 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/psr: Perform full frame update on async flip Jouni Högander
2025-12-03 13:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-12-03 13:58 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-03 15:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-12-03 15:13 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-03 15:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-12-04 5:49 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-04 7:10 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-01 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/psr: Allow async flip when Selective Fetch enabled Jouni Högander
2025-12-01 14:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Selective Fetch and async flip (rev3) Patchwork
2025-12-01 15:03 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-12-01 15:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-12-01 17:25 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f912f8907477fa8335984eafc16cd0ed2ededdb.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox