From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Use XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_WC_CPU for DSB
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:52:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85jzf1g12p.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240920190107.156914-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:01:07 -0700, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
> Now that we have an explicit flag, we can stop abusing the scanout flag
> for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_dsb_buffer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_dsb_buffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_dsb_buffer.c
> index 9f941fc2e36b..59c5aedefc25 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_dsb_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_dsb_buffer.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ bool intel_dsb_buffer_create(struct intel_crtc *crtc, struct intel_dsb_buffer *d
> NULL, PAGE_ALIGN(size),
> ttm_bo_type_kernel,
> XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(xe_device_get_root_tile(xe)) |
> - XE_BO_FLAG_SCANOUT | XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT);
> + XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_WC_CPU | XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT);
Also delete the comment just above the function call above: "Set scanout
flag for WC mapping".
> if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
> kfree(vma);
> return false;
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 19:01 [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_WC_CPU and unify mapping for page tables Maarten Lankhorst
2024-09-20 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Use XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_WC_CPU for DSB Maarten Lankhorst
2024-09-24 3:52 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2024-09-20 19:07 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_WC_CPU and unify mapping for page tables Patchwork
2024-09-20 19:07 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-20 19:08 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-20 19:20 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 19:22 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 19:24 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-20 19:42 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-21 0:52 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-24 3:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-09-25 23:05 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_WC_CPU and unify mapping for page tables. (rev2) Patchwork
2024-09-25 23:05 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-25 23:06 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-25 23:18 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-25 23:20 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-25 23:21 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-26 0:00 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-26 4:46 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-26 8:23 ` Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85jzf1g12p.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox