From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract intel_spi_read16()
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:02:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871q1pgjwk.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240910134219.28479-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> The SPI VBT codepath only knows how to read 4 bytes at a time.
> So to read the 2 byte vbt_size it masks out the unwanted msbs.
> Hide that little implementation detail inside a new intel_spi_read16()
> helper. Alse rename the existing intel_spi_read() to intel_spi_read32()
> to make it clear what it does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index cc4a4cc2bf3e..cbbda94c3dab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -3053,13 +3053,18 @@ static struct vbt_header *firmware_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> return vbt;
> }
>
> -static u32 intel_spi_read(struct intel_uncore *uncore, u32 offset)
> +static u32 intel_spi_read32(struct intel_uncore *uncore, u32 offset)
> {
> intel_uncore_write(uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_ADDRESS, offset);
>
> return intel_uncore_read(uncore, PRIMARY_SPI_TRIGGER);
> }
>
> +static u16 intel_spi_read16(struct intel_uncore *uncore, u32 offset)
> +{
> + return intel_spi_read32(uncore, offset) & 0xffff;
> +}
> +
> static struct vbt_header *spi_oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> size_t *size)
> {
> @@ -3078,7 +3083,7 @@ static struct vbt_header *spi_oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> oprom_offset &= OROM_OFFSET_MASK;
>
> for (count = 0; count < oprom_size; count += 4) {
> - data = intel_spi_read(&i915->uncore, oprom_offset + count);
> + data = intel_spi_read32(&i915->uncore, oprom_offset + count);
> if (data == *((const u32 *)"$VBT")) {
> found = oprom_offset + count;
> break;
> @@ -3094,9 +3099,8 @@ static struct vbt_header *spi_oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> }
>
> /* Get VBT size and allocate space for the VBT */
> - vbt_size = intel_spi_read(&i915->uncore,
> - found + offsetof(struct vbt_header, vbt_size));
> - vbt_size &= 0xffff;
> + vbt_size = intel_spi_read16(&i915->uncore,
> + found + offsetof(struct vbt_header, vbt_size));
Pedantically if vbt_size was the last member of struct vbt_header this
could read past the checked size, but it's not and meh. Also nothing to
do with this change, apart from this hiding the detail. Still meh.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> if (vbt_size > oprom_size - count) {
> drm_dbg(display->drm,
> @@ -3109,7 +3113,7 @@ static struct vbt_header *spi_oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> goto err_not_found;
>
> for (count = 0; count < vbt_size; count += 4)
> - *(vbt + store++) = intel_spi_read(&i915->uncore, found + count);
> + *(vbt + store++) = intel_spi_read32(&i915->uncore, found + count);
>
> if (!intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(display, vbt, vbt_size))
> goto err_free_vbt;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 13:42 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/bios: Refactor ROM access Ville Syrjala
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/bios: Add some size checks to SPI VBT read Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 11:56 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/bios: Round PCI ROM VBT allocation to multiple of 4 Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 11:57 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract intel_spi_read16() Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:02 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-09-20 17:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract vbt_signature[] Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:15 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 16:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 9:12 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-23 14:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 14:24 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-23 14:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract soc/intel_rom.c Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:44 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 17:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 9:13 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 15:21 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/bios: Refactor ROM access Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:21 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:34 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:37 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:39 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-10 16:21 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-10 18:20 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871q1pgjwk.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox