Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract vbt_signature[]
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:24:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cb25txt.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZvF5qm-uT8yXt6p7@intel.com>

On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:12:39PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2024, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:15:52PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >> >
>> >> > Replace the three hand rolled "$VBT"s with a vbt_signature[]
>> >> > to avoid accidents.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 12 +++++++++---
>> >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> >> > index cbbda94c3dab..0b92b494117f 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> >> > @@ -2964,6 +2964,8 @@ static const struct bdb_header *get_bdb_header(const struct vbt_header *vbt)
>> >> >  	return _vbt + vbt->bdb_offset;
>> >> >  }
>> >> >  
>> >> > +static const char vbt_signature[4] = "$VBT";
>> >> 
>> >> Always a bit scary to add strings without termination, but I guess it's
>> >> justified here.
>> >
>> > I guess we could make it look less like a string with eg.
>> > static const u8 vbt_signature[] = { '$', 'V', 'B', 'T' };
>> > ?
>> 
>> Alternatively,
>> 
>> static const char *vbt_signature = "$VBT";
>
> Or could just be something like:
>
> static const char vbt_signature[] = "$VBT";
> static const int vbt_signature_len = 4;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(vbt_signature_len != sizeof(vbt_signature) - 1);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(vbt_signature_len != sizeof(u32));
>
> and use vbt_signature_len instead sizeof(vbt_signature) everwhere.

Works for me, up to you.

BR,
Jani.

>
>> 
>> >
>> >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> > +
>> >> >  /**
>> >> >   * intel_bios_is_valid_vbt - does the given buffer contain a valid VBT
>> >> >   * @display:	display device
>> >> > @@ -2986,7 +2988,7 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
>> >> >  		return false;
>> >> >  	}
>> >> >  
>> >> > -	if (memcmp(vbt->signature, "$VBT", 4)) {
>> >> > +	if (memcmp(vbt->signature, vbt_signature, sizeof(vbt_signature))) {
>> 
>> But then this would need strlen()
>> 
>> >> >  		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "VBT invalid signature\n");
>> >> >  		return false;
>> >> >  	}
>> >> > @@ -3082,9 +3084,11 @@ static struct vbt_header *spi_oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
>> >> >  	oprom_offset = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, OROM_OFFSET);
>> >> >  	oprom_offset &= OROM_OFFSET_MASK;
>> >> >  
>> >> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(vbt_signature) != sizeof(u32));
>> 
>> And maybe this could be sizeof(vbt_signature) < sizeof(u32)
>> 
>> All of the alternatives are a bit disappointing, so maybe let's just
>> roll with the patch you already have here?
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>> 
>> >> > +
>> >> >  	for (count = 0; count < oprom_size; count += 4) {
>> >> >  		data = intel_spi_read32(&i915->uncore, oprom_offset + count);
>> >> > -		if (data == *((const u32 *)"$VBT")) {
>> >> > +		if (data == *((const u32 *)vbt_signature)) {
>> >> >  			found = oprom_offset + count;
>> >> >  			break;
>> >> >  		}
>> >> > @@ -3144,9 +3148,11 @@ static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
>> >> >  	if (!oprom)
>> >> >  		return NULL;
>> >> >  
>> >> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(vbt_signature) != sizeof(u32));
>> >> > +
>> >> >  	/* Scour memory looking for the VBT signature. */
>> >> >  	for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i += 4) {
>> >> > -		if (ioread32(oprom + i) != *((const u32 *)"$VBT"))
>> >> > +		if (ioread32(oprom + i) != *((const u32 *)vbt_signature))
>> >> >  			continue;
>> >> >  
>> >> >  		p = oprom + i;
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> Jani Nikula, Intel
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-23 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-10 13:42 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/bios: Refactor ROM access Ville Syrjala
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/bios: Add some size checks to SPI VBT read Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 11:56   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/bios: Round PCI ROM VBT allocation to multiple of 4 Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 11:57   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract intel_spi_read16() Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:02   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 17:00     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract vbt_signature[] Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:15   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 16:59     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23  9:12       ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-23 14:22         ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 14:24           ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-09-23 14:29             ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract soc/intel_rom.c Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:44   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 17:02     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23  9:13       ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 15:21 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/bios: Refactor ROM access Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:21 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:34 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:37 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-10 15:39 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-10 16:21 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-10 18:20 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877cb25txt.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox