From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe/eustall: Do not support EU stall on SRIOV VF
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:12:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cyd4104n.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAfnh9L-GZ1RNe2f@intel.com>
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:01:27 -0700, Harish Chegondi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 05:59:43PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 22:59:01 -0700, Harish Chegondi wrote:
> > >
> > > EU stall sampling is not supported on SRIOV VF. Do not
> > > initialize or open EU stall stream on SRIOV VF.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.c | 3 +++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.h | 3 ++-
> > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.c
> > > index f2bb9168967c..64788277ea52 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.c
> > > @@ -208,6 +208,9 @@ int xe_eu_stall_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > > struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > + if (!xe_eu_stall_supported_on_platform(xe))
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > This check is not strictly needed. If the check is not there, just some
> > unnecessary stuff will get initialized.
> >
> > But if you want to add this check here, you will also need to a
> > 'if (!gt->eu_stall)' check in xe_eu_stall_fini(). If you test this patch,
> > maybe you will already see oops when unloading the driver?
> Hi Ashutosh,
> This check would prevent calling devm_add_action_or_reset() for those
> platforms that do not support EU stall sampling and therefore
> xe_eu_stall_fini() will not be registered for callback during module
> unload. So, I think it is not required to add the additional check in
> xe_eu_stall_fini().
Sorry, yes you are right. I forgot xe_eu_stall_fini() is not called
directly now.
In that case, maybe we should still change the
xe_eu_stall_supported_on_platform() check in xe_eu_stall_stream_open() to
'if (!gt->eu_stall)' check? It's a nit but still maybe better do it I
think.
> >
> > So either remove this check or add the additional check in
> > xe_eu_stall_fini().
> >
> > > +
> > > gt->eu_stall = kzalloc(sizeof(*gt->eu_stall), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > if (!gt->eu_stall) {
> > > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.h
> > > index ed9d0f233566..d1c76e503799 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_eu_stall.h
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > > #define __XE_EU_STALL_H__
> > >
> > > #include "xe_gt_types.h"
> > > +#include "xe_sriov.h"
> > >
> > > size_t xe_eu_stall_get_per_xecore_buf_size(void);
> > > size_t xe_eu_stall_data_record_size(struct xe_device *xe);
> > > @@ -19,6 +20,6 @@ int xe_eu_stall_stream_open(struct drm_device *dev,
> > >
> > > static inline bool xe_eu_stall_supported_on_platform(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > {
> > > - return xe->info.platform == XE_PVC || GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 20;
> > > + return !IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) && (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC || GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 20);
> > > }
> > > #endif
> > > --
> > > 2.48.1
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-22 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-21 5:59 [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe/eustall: Do not support EU stall on SRIOV VF Harish Chegondi
2025-04-22 0:59 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-04-22 4:25 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-04-23 21:41 ` Harish Chegondi
2025-04-23 23:19 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-04-24 4:56 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-04-24 5:01 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-04-24 17:50 ` Harish Chegondi
2025-04-24 18:27 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-04-22 19:01 ` Harish Chegondi
2025-04-22 19:12 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-04-24 12:49 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/1] drm/xe/eustall: Do not support EU stall on SRIOV VF (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-24 12:49 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-04-24 12:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-04-24 12:59 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-24 13:01 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-24 13:02 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2025-04-25 7:25 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cyd4104n.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=harish.chegondi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.s.atwood@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox