Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/43] drm/xe/compat-i915: Convert register access to use xe_mmio
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:02:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cylhnoj2.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240904002100.2023834-59-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

On Tue, 03 Sep 2024, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> Stop using GT pointers for register access.
>
> Since display (via compat-i915) was the only part of the driver doing
> 8-bit and 16-bit register reads, this also allows us to drop the
> _Generic wrapper macro on these two functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h | 36 +++++++++----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c                  |  4 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h                  |  7 ++--
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
> index eb5b5f0e4bd9..ee3469d4ae73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
> @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@
>  #include "xe_device_types.h"
>  #include "xe_mmio.h"
>  
> -static inline struct xe_gt *__compat_uncore_to_gt(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> +static inline struct xe_mmio *__compat_uncore_to_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(uncore, struct xe_device, uncore);
>  
> -	return xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
> +	return xe_root_tile_mmio(xe);
>  }

Side note, I'd be really interested in ideas getting from the intel_de.h
struct intel_display based interfaces to both i915 struct intel_uncore
and xe struct xe_mmio based interfaces.

Is the easiest common denominator actually a struct drm_device based
interface? At the calling side, we shouldn't use or have any idea about
i915 or xe specifics, like struct drm_i915_private, struct xe_device,
struct intel_uncore, struct xe_mmio, struct intel_gt or struct xe_gt,
etc.

BR,
Jani.


>  
>  static inline struct xe_tile *__compat_uncore_to_tile(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static inline u32 intel_uncore_read(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg);
> +	return xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u8 intel_uncore_read8(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static inline u8 intel_uncore_read8(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_read8(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg);
> +	return xe_mmio_read8(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u16 intel_uncore_read16(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline u16 intel_uncore_read16(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_read16(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg);
> +	return xe_mmio_read16(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u64
> @@ -57,11 +57,11 @@ intel_uncore_read64_2x32(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  	u32 upper, lower, old_upper;
>  	int loop = 0;
>  
> -	upper = xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), upper_reg);
> +	upper = xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), upper_reg);
>  	do {
>  		old_upper = upper;
> -		lower = xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), lower_reg);
> -		upper = xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), upper_reg);
> +		lower = xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), lower_reg);
> +		upper = xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), upper_reg);
>  	} while (upper != old_upper && loop++ < 2);
>  
>  	return (u64)upper << 32 | lower;
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline void intel_uncore_posting_read(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg);
> +	xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void intel_uncore_write(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline void intel_uncore_write(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	xe_mmio_write32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg, val);
> +	xe_mmio_write32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, val);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u32 intel_uncore_rmw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static inline u32 intel_uncore_rmw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_rmw32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg, clear, set);
> +	return xe_mmio_rmw32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, clear, set);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int intel_wait_for_register(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline int intel_wait_for_register(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_wait32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg, mask, value,
> +	return xe_mmio_wait32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, mask, value,
>  			      timeout * USEC_PER_MSEC, NULL, false);
>  }
>  
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline int intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_wait32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg, mask, value,
> +	return xe_mmio_wait32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, mask, value,
>  			      timeout * USEC_PER_MSEC, NULL, false);
>  }
>  
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ __intel_wait_for_register(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t i915_reg,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_wait32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg, mask, value,
> +	return xe_mmio_wait32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, mask, value,
>  			      fast_timeout_us + 1000 * slow_timeout_ms,
>  			      out_value, false);
>  }
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline u32 intel_uncore_read_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg);
> +	return xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void intel_uncore_write_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static inline void intel_uncore_write_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	xe_mmio_write32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg, val);
> +	xe_mmio_write32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, val);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u32 intel_uncore_read_notrace(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static inline u32 intel_uncore_read_notrace(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	return xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg);
> +	return xe_mmio_read32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void intel_uncore_write_notrace(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static inline void intel_uncore_write_notrace(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>  {
>  	struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
>  
> -	xe_mmio_write32(__compat_uncore_to_gt(uncore), reg, val);
> +	xe_mmio_write32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, val);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void __iomem *intel_uncore_regs(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> index 92f0bda0ae30..dbede6056bee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void mmio_flush_pending_writes(struct xe_mmio *mmio)
>  		writel(0, mmio->regs + DUMMY_REG_OFFSET);
>  }
>  
> -u8 __xe_mmio_read8(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg)
> +u8 xe_mmio_read8(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg)
>  {
>  	u32 addr = xe_mmio_adjusted_addr(mmio, reg.addr);
>  	u8 val;
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ u8 __xe_mmio_read8(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg)
>  	return val;
>  }
>  
> -u16 __xe_mmio_read16(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg)
> +u16 xe_mmio_read16(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg)
>  {
>  	u32 addr = xe_mmio_adjusted_addr(mmio, reg.addr);
>  	u16 val;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> index ac6846447c52..99e3b58c9bb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> @@ -27,11 +27,8 @@ int xe_mmio_probe_tiles(struct xe_device *xe);
>  		 const struct xe_mmio *: (ptr), \
>  		 struct xe_mmio *: (ptr))
>  
> -u8 __xe_mmio_read8(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg);
> -#define xe_mmio_read8(p, reg) __xe_mmio_read8(__to_xe_mmio(p), reg)
> -
> -u16 __xe_mmio_read16(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg);
> -#define xe_mmio_read16(p, reg) __xe_mmio_read16(__to_xe_mmio(p), reg)
> +u8 xe_mmio_read8(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg);
> +u16 xe_mmio_read16(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg);
>  
>  void __xe_mmio_write32(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg, u32 val);
>  #define xe_mmio_write32(p, reg, val) __xe_mmio_write32(__to_xe_mmio(p), reg, val)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-06  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-04  0:21 [PATCH 00/43] Stop using xe_gt as a register MMIO target Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 01/43] drm/xe: Move forcewake to 'gt.pm' substructure Matt Roper
2024-09-05 20:03   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 02/43] drm/xe: Create dedicated xe_mmio structure Matt Roper
2024-09-05 20:08   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-06 13:49   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 03/43] drm/xe: Clarify size of MMIO region Matt Roper
2024-09-05 21:19   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 04/43] drm/xe: Move GSI offset adjustment fields into 'struct xe_mmio' Matt Roper
2024-09-05 21:53   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 05/43] drm/xe: Populate GT's mmio iomap from tile during init Matt Roper
2024-09-05 21:58   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 06/43] drm/xe: Switch mmio_ext to use 'struct xe_mmio' Matt Roper
2024-09-06  1:47   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 07/43] drm/xe: Add xe_device backpointer to xe_mmio Matt Roper
2024-09-06  1:51   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-06 14:15   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 08/43] drm/xe: Adjust mmio code to pass VF substructure to SRIOV code Matt Roper
2024-09-06  3:32   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-06 15:28   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-09-06 19:44     ` Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 09/43] drm/xe: Switch MMIO interface to take xe_mmio instead of xe_gt Matt Roper
2024-09-06  3:44   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-06 22:44     ` Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 10/43] drm/xe/irq: Convert register access to use xe_mmio Matt Roper
2024-09-06  3:47   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 11/43] drm/xe/pcode: " Matt Roper
2024-09-06 21:40   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 12/43] drm/xe/hwmon: " Matt Roper
2024-09-06 21:41   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 13/43] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2024-09-06 21:46   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 14/43] drm/xe/compat-i915: " Matt Roper
2024-09-06  9:02   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-09-06 21:51     ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-06 23:17       ` Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 15/43] drm/xe/lmtt: " Matt Roper
2024-09-06 21:52   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 16/43] drm/xe/stolen: " Matt Roper
2024-09-06 23:17   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 17/43] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 18/43] drm/xe/pci: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 19/43] drm/xe/wa: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 20/43] drm/xe/uc: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 21/43] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 22/43] drm/xe/huc: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 23/43] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 24/43] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 25/43] drm/xe/mcr: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 26/43] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 27/43] drm/xe/hw_engine: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 28/43] drm/xe/gt_throttle: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 29/43] drm/xe/pat: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 30/43] drm/xe/wopcm: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 31/43] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 32/43] drm/xe/topology: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 33/43] drm/xe/execlist: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 34/43] drm/xe/gt_clock: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 35/43] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 36/43] drm/xe/gt: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 37/43] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 38/43] drm/xe/tlb: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 39/43] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 40/43] drm/xe/forcewake: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 41/43] drm/xe/ggtt: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 42/43] drm/xe/ccs_mode: " Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:21 ` [PATCH 43/43] drm/xe/mmio: Drop compatibility macros Matt Roper
2024-09-04  0:27 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Stop using xe_gt as a register MMIO target Patchwork
2024-09-04  0:28 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-04  0:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-04  0:41 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-04  0:43 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-04  0:44 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-09-04  1:03 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-04  5:33 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87cylhnoj2.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox