Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 15:59:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ldsgytev.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250326162544.3642-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Continue improving the code around sagv/bw vs.
> watermarks. A lot of the details get better encapsulated
> within intel_bw.c and the complicated interactions between
> different parts of the code are somewhat reduced.

On the series,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

with the caveat that my understanding of all the subtle bw stuff details
in patches 6-14 is admittedly weak. The patches make sense, and I didn't
spot anything obviously wrong, but there may well be cases that I just
couldn't think of.

BR,
Jani.


>
> v2: Rebase due to intel_display conversions
>
> Ville Syrjälä (14):
>   drm/i915: Drop the cached per-pipe min_cdclk[] from bw state
>   drm/i915: s/intel_crtc_bw/intel_dbuf_bw/
>   drm/i915: Extract intel_dbuf_bw_changed()
>   drm/i915: Pass intel_dbuf_bw to skl_*_calc_dbuf_bw() explicitly
>   drm/i915: Avoid triggering unwanted cdclk changes due to dbuf
>     bandwidth changes
>   drm/i915: Do more bw readout
>   drm/i915: Flag even inactive crtcs as "inherited"
>   drm/i915: Drop force_check_qgv
>   drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_modeset_checks()
>   drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_check_sagv_mask()
>   drm/i915: Make intel_bw_check_sagv_mask() internal to intel_bw.c
>   drm/i915: Make intel_bw_modeset_checks() internal to
>     intel_bw_atomic_check()
>   drm/i915: Skip bw stuff if per-crtc sagv state doesn't change
>   drm/i915: Eliminate intel_compute_sagv_mask()
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c       | 187 ++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h       |   9 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c    |   4 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |   5 +-
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c    |  22 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c  | 112 ++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h  |   1 +
>  7 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-04 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-26 16:25 [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/i915: Drop the cached per-pipe min_cdclk[] from bw state Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27  7:56   ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915: s/intel_crtc_bw/intel_dbuf_bw/ Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27  7:57   ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_dbuf_bw_changed() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27  7:57   ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915: Pass intel_dbuf_bw to skl_*_calc_dbuf_bw() explicitly Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27  7:57   ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915: Avoid triggering unwanted cdclk changes due to dbuf bandwidth changes Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27  8:00   ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-27 12:06     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/i915: Do more bw readout Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/i915: Flag even inactive crtcs as "inherited" Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/i915: Drop force_check_qgv Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_modeset_checks() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_check_sagv_mask() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/i915: Make intel_bw_check_sagv_mask() internal to intel_bw.c Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/i915: Make intel_bw_modeset_checks() internal to intel_bw_atomic_check() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] drm/i915: Skip bw stuff if per-crtc sagv state doesn't change Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] drm/i915: Eliminate intel_compute_sagv_mask() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 17:45 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:45 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:03 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:07 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-03-27  8:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-27 11:46 ` Patchwork
2025-04-04 12:59 ` Jani Nikula [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ldsgytev.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox