From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915: s/intel_crtc_bw/intel_dbuf_bw/
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:57:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877c4a7vom.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250326162544.3642-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Rename the intel_crtc_bw struct to intel_dbuf_bw to better
> reflect what it does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index 15c2377193f7..b34db55f5a7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -1157,15 +1157,15 @@ static bool intel_bw_state_changed(struct intel_display *display,
> enum pipe pipe;
>
> for_each_pipe(display, pipe) {
> - const struct intel_dbuf_bw *old_crtc_bw =
> + const struct intel_dbuf_bw *old_dbuf_bw =
> &old_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> - const struct intel_dbuf_bw *new_crtc_bw =
> + const struct intel_dbuf_bw *new_dbuf_bw =
> &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> enum dbuf_slice slice;
>
> for_each_dbuf_slice(display, slice) {
> - if (old_crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] != new_crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] ||
> - old_crtc_bw->active_planes[slice] != new_crtc_bw->active_planes[slice])
> + if (old_dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice] != new_dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice] ||
> + old_dbuf_bw->active_planes[slice] != new_dbuf_bw->active_planes[slice])
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ static void skl_plane_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> - struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> + struct intel_dbuf_bw *dbuf_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> unsigned int dbuf_mask = skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(i915, ddb);
> enum dbuf_slice slice;
>
> @@ -1194,8 +1194,8 @@ static void skl_plane_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> * equal share of the total bw to each plane.
> */
> for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(display, slice, dbuf_mask) {
> - crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] = max(crtc_bw->max_bw[slice], data_rate);
> - crtc_bw->active_planes[slice] |= BIT(plane_id);
> + dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice] = max(dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice], data_rate);
> + dbuf_bw->active_planes[slice] |= BIT(plane_id);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1204,10 +1204,10 @@ static void skl_crtc_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> - struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> + struct intel_dbuf_bw *dbuf_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> enum plane_id plane_id;
>
> - memset(crtc_bw, 0, sizeof(*crtc_bw));
> + memset(dbuf_bw, 0, sizeof(*dbuf_bw));
>
> if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
> return;
> @@ -1249,10 +1249,10 @@ intel_bw_dbuf_min_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
> * equal share of the total bw to each plane.
> */
> for_each_pipe(display, pipe) {
> - const struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> + const struct intel_dbuf_bw *dbuf_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
>
> - max_bw = max(crtc_bw->max_bw[slice], max_bw);
> - num_active_planes += hweight8(crtc_bw->active_planes[slice]);
> + max_bw = max(dbuf_bw->max_bw[slice], max_bw);
> + num_active_planes += hweight8(dbuf_bw->active_planes[slice]);
> }
> max_bw *= num_active_planes;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-27 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-26 16:25 [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/i915: Drop the cached per-pipe min_cdclk[] from bw state Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 7:56 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915: s/intel_crtc_bw/intel_dbuf_bw/ Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 7:57 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_dbuf_bw_changed() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 7:57 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915: Pass intel_dbuf_bw to skl_*_calc_dbuf_bw() explicitly Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 7:57 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915: Avoid triggering unwanted cdclk changes due to dbuf bandwidth changes Ville Syrjala
2025-03-27 8:00 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-27 12:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/i915: Do more bw readout Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/i915: Flag even inactive crtcs as "inherited" Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/i915: Drop force_check_qgv Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_modeset_checks() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_check_sagv_mask() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/i915: Make intel_bw_check_sagv_mask() internal to intel_bw.c Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/i915: Make intel_bw_modeset_checks() internal to intel_bw_atomic_check() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] drm/i915: Skip bw stuff if per-crtc sagv state doesn't change Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] drm/i915: Eliminate intel_compute_sagv_mask() Ville Syrjala
2025-03-26 17:45 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:45 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-26 17:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:03 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:07 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-26 18:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-03-27 8:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-27 11:46 ` Patchwork
2025-04-04 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915: sagv/bw cleanup Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877c4a7vom.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox