From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Daniel Charles <daniel.charles@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: drm/i915/dmc_wl: Remove macro HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK()
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 15:34:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mrxvp7sr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a1d98fd-21d0-4f9f-88e2-de7a230fd9bc@intel.com>
Daniel Charles <daniel.charles@intel.com> writes:
> On 4/29/2026 7:26 AM, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>> The macro HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK() is currently only used inside
>> intel_dmc_wl.c and doesn't need to be exposed to the rest of the driver.
>> Furthermore, there is a distinction between the display IP having
>> support for the feature and the driver actually using it, so using
>> HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK() outside of intel_dmc_wl.c would potentially be wrong
>> anyway.
>>
>> Let's drop that macro. If other part of the driver needs to check if
>> the driver is using the DMC wakelock feature, we would need actually to
>> expose the function __intel_dmc_wl_supported().
>>
>> Since HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK() was kind of self-documenting in the sense that
>> it tells us what display IPs have support for the feature and we are now
>> dropping it, let's also take this opportunity to add a documentation
>> note on the subject.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 9ee30ac229d686465b572e6404250178b28b616b
>> change-id: 20260429-drop-has_dmc_wakelock-e939d11588a7
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> index 074e3ba8fb77..12e5a522a299 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> @@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ struct intel_display_platforms {
>> #define HAS_DDI(__display) (DISPLAY_INFO(__display)->has_ddi)
>> #define HAS_DISPLAY(__display) (DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(__display)->pipe_mask != 0)
>> #define HAS_DMC(__display) (DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(__display)->has_dmc)
>> -#define HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK(__display) (DISPLAY_VER(__display) >= 20)
>> #define HAS_DOUBLE_BUFFERED_M_N(__display) (IS_DISPLAY_VER((__display), 9, 14) || (__display)->platform.broadwell)
>> #define HAS_DOUBLE_BUFFERED_LUT(__display) (DISPLAY_VER(__display) >= 30)
>> #define HAS_DOUBLE_WIDE(__display) (DISPLAY_VER(__display) < 4)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
>> index ddf1a1f1ebc3..7769860e17ea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,13 @@
>> * current implementation, we only need one wakelock, so only
>> * DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL is used. The other definitions are here for
>> * potential future use.
>> + *
>> + * This is available starting with Xe2_LPD (display version 20) as an
>> + * experimental feature and on Xe3_LPD (display version 30) as the
>> + * first display release with official support. That means that we
>> + * only enable the feature by default on the latter and using it on
>> + * the former requires explicitly using the enable_dmc_wl module
>> + * parameter.
>> */
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -286,7 +293,7 @@ static void intel_dmc_wl_sanitize_param(struct intel_display *display)
>> {
>> const char *desc;
>>
>> - if (!HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK(display)) {
>> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20) {
>> display->params.enable_dmc_wl = ENABLE_DMC_WL_DISABLED;
>> } else if (display->params.enable_dmc_wl < 0) {
>> if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30)
>
> LGTM
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Charles <daniel.charles@intel.com>
Pushed to drm-intel-next. Thanks Daniel for the review!
--
Gustavo Sousa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 14:26 [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc_wl: Remove macro HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK() Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-29 15:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-04-29 17:19 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-30 4:01 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-05-19 18:12 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-11 16:51 ` Daniel Charles
2026-05-19 18:34 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mrxvp7sr.fsf@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.charles@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox