Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 05/26] drm/xe: Move register MMIO into xe_tile
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 15:20:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8gzkqjw.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511034722.1929038-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

On Wed, 10 May 2023, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> Each tile has its own register region in the BAR, containing instances
> of all registers for the platform.  In contrast, the multiple GTs within
> a tile share the same MMIO space; there's just a small subset of
> registers (the GSI registers) which have multiple copies at different
> offsets (0x0 for primary GT, 0x380000 for media GT).  Move the register
> MMIO region size/pointers to the tile structure, leaving just the GSI
> offset information in the GT structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h      | 16 ++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c              |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h          |  9 +++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c              | 26 ++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h              | 21 +++++++++++++-----
>  6 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
> index afde97b6faa6..a9cbd7b59360 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ gen8_de_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 master_ctl)
>  
>  void gen11_display_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
> -	void __iomem * const regs = to_gt(i915)->mmio.regs;
> +	void __iomem * const regs = xe_device_get_root_tile(i915)->mmio.regs;

Side note, I'm hoping to merge [1] into i915, backport (or rebase) that
into xe, nuking ext/i915_irq.c completely.

IDK if that means adding new ifdefs in the display irq file, or how we
could abstract this in a way that doesn't require changes in i915
display code.

BR,
Jani.


[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/117344/



>  	const u32 disp_ctl = raw_reg_read(regs, GEN11_DISPLAY_INT_CTL);
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index 5dcf1695925f..2481b2045284 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,22 @@ struct xe_tile {
>  	struct xe_gt primary_gt;
>  
>  	/* TODO: Add media GT here */
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * @mmio: MMIO info for a tile.
> +	 *
> +	 * Each tile has its own 16MB space in BAR0, laid out as:
> +	 * * 0-4MB: registers
> +	 * * 4MB-8MB: reserved
> +	 * * 8MB-16MB: global GTT
> +	 */
> +	struct {
> +		/** @size: size of tile's MMIO space */
> +		size_t size;
> +
> +		/** @regs: pointer to tile's MMIO space (starting with registers) */
> +		void *regs;
> +	} mmio;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> index 546240261e0a..200976da3dc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static void ggtt_fini_noalloc(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
>  int xe_ggtt_init_noalloc(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> +	struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
>  	unsigned int gsm_size;
>  
> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ int xe_ggtt_init_noalloc(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_ggtt *ggtt)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	ggtt->gsm = gt->mmio.regs + SZ_8M;
> +	ggtt->gsm = tile->mmio.regs + SZ_8M;
>  	ggtt->size = (gsm_size / 8) * (u64) XE_PAGE_SIZE;
>  
>  	if (IS_DGFX(xe) && xe->info.vram_flags & XE_VRAM_FLAGS_NEED64K)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> index c4376d50786b..03dd625b2781 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> @@ -124,14 +124,11 @@ struct xe_gt {
>  	} info;
>  
>  	/**
> -	 * @mmio: mmio info for GT, can be subset of the global device mmio
> -	 * space
> +	 * @mmio: mmio info for GT.  All GTs within a tile share the same
> +	 * register space, but have their own copy of GSI registers at a
> +	 * specific offset, as well as their own forcewake handling.
>  	 */
>  	struct {
> -		/** @size: size of MMIO space on GT */
> -		size_t size;
> -		/** @regs: pointer to MMIO space on GT */
> -		void *regs;
>  		/** @fw: force wake for GT */
>  		struct xe_force_wake fw;
>  		/**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> index 254b4a63d901..54fa1212fcd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> @@ -307,6 +307,7 @@ static void xe_mmio_probe_tiles(struct xe_device *xe)
>  
>  	if (xe->info.tile_count > 1) {
>  		const int mmio_bar = 0;
> +		struct xe_tile *tile;
>  		size_t size;
>  		void *regs;
>  
> @@ -320,11 +321,11 @@ static void xe_mmio_probe_tiles(struct xe_device *xe)
>  		size = xe->mmio.size / adj_tile_count;
>  		regs = xe->mmio.regs;
>  
> -		for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> -			if (id && !xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
> -				regs += size;
> -			gt->mmio.size = size;
> -			gt->mmio.regs = regs;
> +		for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
> +			tile->mmio.size = size;
> +			tile->mmio.regs = regs;
> +
> +			regs += size;
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -340,15 +341,16 @@ static void mmio_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
>  
>  int xe_mmio_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
> +	struct xe_tile *root_tile = xe_device_get_root_tile(xe);
>  	struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
>  	const int mmio_bar = 0;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Map the entire BAR, which includes registers (0-4MB), reserved space
> -	 * (4MB-8MB), and GGTT (8MB-16MB). Other parts of the driver (GTs,
> -	 * GGTTs) will derive the pointers they need from the mapping in the
> -	 * device structure.
> +	 * Map the first 16MB of th BAR, which includes the registers (0-4MB),
> +	 * reserved space (4MB-8MB), and GGTT (8MB-16MB) for a single tile.
> +	 * This will get remapped later if we determine that we're running
> +	 * on a multi-tile system.
>  	 */
>  	xe->mmio.size = SZ_16M;
>  	xe->mmio.regs = pci_iomap(to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev), mmio_bar,
> @@ -362,9 +364,9 @@ int xe_mmio_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	/* 1 GT for now, 1 to 1 mapping, may change on multi-GT devices */
> -	gt->mmio.size = xe->mmio.size;
> -	gt->mmio.regs = xe->mmio.regs;
> +	/* Setup first tile; other tiles (if present) will be setup later. */
> +	root_tile->mmio.size = xe->mmio.size;
> +	root_tile->mmio.regs = xe->mmio.regs;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The boot firmware initializes local memory and assesses its health.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> index 1407f1189b0d..acf0b18f3111 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
>  
>  #include "regs/xe_reg_defs.h"
> +#include "xe_device_types.h"
>  #include "xe_gt_types.h"
>  
>  struct drm_device;
> @@ -20,27 +21,33 @@ int xe_mmio_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
>  static inline u8 xe_mmio_read8(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_reg reg)
>  {
> +	struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
> +
>  	if (reg.addr < gt->mmio.adj_limit)
>  		reg.addr += gt->mmio.adj_offset;
>  
> -	return readb(gt->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
> +	return readb(tile->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void xe_mmio_write32(struct xe_gt *gt,
>  				   struct xe_reg reg, u32 val)
>  {
> +	struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
> +
>  	if (reg.addr < gt->mmio.adj_limit)
>  		reg.addr += gt->mmio.adj_offset;
>  
> -	writel(val, gt->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
> +	writel(val, tile->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u32 xe_mmio_read32(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_reg reg)
>  {
> +	struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
> +
>  	if (reg.addr < gt->mmio.adj_limit)
>  		reg.addr += gt->mmio.adj_offset;
>  
> -	return readl(gt->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
> +	return readl(tile->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u32 xe_mmio_rmw32(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_reg reg, u32 clr,
> @@ -58,18 +65,22 @@ static inline u32 xe_mmio_rmw32(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_reg reg, u32 clr,
>  static inline void xe_mmio_write64(struct xe_gt *gt,
>  				   struct xe_reg reg, u64 val)
>  {
> +	struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
> +
>  	if (reg.addr < gt->mmio.adj_limit)
>  		reg.addr += gt->mmio.adj_offset;
>  
> -	writeq(val, gt->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
> +	writeq(val, tile->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u64 xe_mmio_read64(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_reg reg)
>  {
> +	struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
> +
>  	if (reg.addr < gt->mmio.adj_limit)
>  		reg.addr += gt->mmio.adj_offset;
>  
> -	return readq(gt->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
> +	return readq(tile->mmio.regs + reg.addr);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int xe_mmio_write32_and_verify(struct xe_gt *gt,

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-11 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-11  3:46 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/26] Separate GT and tile Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:46 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 01/26] drm/xe/mtl: Disable media GT Matt Roper
2023-05-11 20:50   ` Matt Atwood
2023-05-11 23:29   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-12 15:38     ` Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:46 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 02/26] drm/xe: Introduce xe_tile Matt Roper
2023-05-11  5:46   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-12  5:33   ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-05-12 16:27     ` Matt Roper
2023-05-12  5:45   ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-05-18 17:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11  3:46 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/26] drm/xe: Add backpointer from gt to tile Matt Roper
2023-05-11 21:10   ` Matt Atwood
2023-05-12  0:07   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-12 16:20     ` Matt Roper
2023-05-12 16:31       ` Matt Atwood
2023-05-12 17:00         ` Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 04/26] drm/xe: Add for_each_tile iterator Matt Roper
2023-05-11 23:23   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-12  5:45   ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-05-12 16:28     ` Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 05/26] drm/xe: Move register MMIO into xe_tile Matt Roper
2023-05-11 12:20   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-05-11 22:01     ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-13  5:53   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 06/26] drm/xe: Move VRAM from GT to tile Matt Roper
2023-05-15 22:40   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-18 17:29     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 07/26] drm/xe: Memory allocations are tile-based, not GT-based Matt Roper
2023-05-17  4:56   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 08/26] drm/xe: Move migration from GT to tile Matt Roper
2023-05-17  5:00   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 09/26] drm/xe: Clarify 'gt' retrieval for primary tile Matt Roper
2023-05-17  5:07   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 10/26] drm/xe: Drop vram_id Matt Roper
2023-05-17  5:09   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 11/26] drm/xe: Drop extra_gts[] declarations and XE_GT_TYPE_REMOTE Matt Roper
2023-05-17  5:14   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 12/26] drm/xe: Allocate GT dynamically Matt Roper
2023-05-17  5:23   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 13/26] drm/xe: Add media GT to tile Matt Roper
2023-05-18 17:50   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 14/26] drm/xe: Move display IRQ postinstall out of GT function Matt Roper
2023-05-18 17:51   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-18 18:20   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 15/26] drm/xe: Interrupts are delivered per-tile, not per-GT Matt Roper
2023-05-11 12:14   ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2023-05-11 13:50     ` Matt Roper
2023-05-18 18:30   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 16/26] drm/xe/irq: Handle ASLE backlight interrupts at same time as display Matt Roper
2023-05-18 18:33   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 17/26] drm/xe/irq: Actually call xe_irq_postinstall() Matt Roper
2023-05-18 18:40   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 18/26] drm/xe/irq: Ensure primary GuC won't clobber media GuC's interrupt mask Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 19/26] drm/xe/irq: Untangle postinstall functions Matt Roper
2023-05-18 18:45   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 20/26] drm/xe: Replace xe_gt_irq_postinstall with xe_irq_enable_hwe Matt Roper
2023-05-18 19:54   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 21/26] drm/xe: Invalidate TLB on all affected GTs during GGTT updates Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 22/26] drm/xe/tlb: Obtain forcewake when doing GGTT TLB invalidations Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 23/26] drm/xe: Allow GT looping and lookup on standalone media Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 24/26] drm/xe: Update query uapi to support " Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 25/26] drm/xe: Reinstate media GT support Matt Roper
2023-05-11  3:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 26/26] drm/xe: Clarify source of GT log messages Matt Roper
2023-05-17  9:33   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-05-11  3:50 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Separate GT and tile Patchwork
2023-05-11  3:51 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2023-05-11  7:08 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Separate GT and tile (rev2) Patchwork
2023-05-11  7:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2023-05-12  7:21 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success " Patchwork
2023-05-12  7:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2023-05-15 13:08 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/26] Separate GT and tile Thomas Hellström
2023-05-15 18:11   ` Matt Roper
2023-05-16 14:18 ` Das, Nirmoy
2023-05-18 17:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v8gzkqjw.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox