From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 15:00:32 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wlwzp9dr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518-separate-platform-from-diplay-ip-specific-bw-params-v4-0-918528006549@intel.com>
Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> writes:
> Some of the parameters of used in display bandwidth calculations are
> tied to the platform and are orthogonal to the display IP. After talking
> with the hardware team, we now have the information (and Bspec has been
> updated) that the members deprogbwlimit and derating of struct
> intel_sa_info are such platform-specific ones.
>
> With that, we are now able to make the driver code more aligned with the
> hardware by splitting structs intel_sa_info into two different structs:
> one that is platform-specific and another that is display-IP-specific.
>
> That change also allows us to simplify how we select the parameters for
> the calculation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Pushed to drm-intel-next. Thanks everyone for the feedback and reviews!
--
Gustavo Sousa
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Minor updates to fix issues captured by CI; see changelog in
> individual patches for details.
> - Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20260514-separate-platform-from-diplay-ip-specific-bw-params-v3-0-68727d6fe3ec@intel.com
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Incorporated review feedback; see each individual patch for details.
> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260511-separate-platform-from-diplay-ip-specific-bw-params-v2-0-e762cb8662da@intel.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Incorporated review feedback; see each individual patch for details.
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260408-separate-platform-from-diplay-ip-specific-bw-params-v1-0-23c53afa7db0@intel.com
>
> ---
> Gustavo Sousa (5):
> drm/i915/bw: Don't call intel_dram_info() too early
> drm/i915/bw: Extract platform-specific parameters
> drm/i915/bw: Deduplicate intel_sa_info instances
> drm/i915/bw: Rename struct intel_sa_info to intel_display_bw_params
> drm/i915/bw: Extract get_display_bw_params()
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 205 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: f05be6b9858836632ce6b4839e1bda3a470278b9
> change-id: 20260408-separate-platform-from-diplay-ip-specific-bw-params-65bfba0603be
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 16:13 [PATCH v4 0/5] drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-18 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] drm/i915/bw: Don't call intel_dram_info() too early Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-18 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] drm/i915/bw: Extract platform-specific parameters Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-18 16:46 ` Matt Roper
2026-05-18 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] drm/i915/bw: Deduplicate intel_sa_info instances Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-18 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] drm/i915/bw: Rename struct intel_sa_info to intel_display_bw_params Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-18 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] drm/i915/bw: Extract get_display_bw_params() Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-18 16:56 ` Matt Roper
2026-05-18 16:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/bw: Split bandwidth params into platform- and display-IP-specific structs (rev3) Patchwork
2026-05-18 17:00 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-18 21:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-05-19 18:00 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wlwzp9dr.fsf@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox