From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Correct max compressed bpp bounds by using link bpp
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:45:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a8b63c8-f6a7-4319-afd6-37408681b746@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4lFKYIWMF49peim@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On 1/16/2025 11:13 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:24:16PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>> While setting the bounds for compressed bpp we ensure that the
>> compressed bpp is less than the pipe bpp.
>>
>> This gives an issue with 420 output format where effective link bpp is
>> half that of the pipe bpp. Therefore instead of pipe bpp use link bpp to
>> set the bounds for the compressed bpp.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index 1ad25c37f3c2..47fcfbcb893b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -2068,9 +2068,12 @@ icl_dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> int timeslots)
>> {
>> int i, ret;
>> + int link_bpp;
>> +
>> + link_bpp = intel_dp_output_bpp(pipe_config->output_format, pipe_bpp);
> Here and in the xelpd version, using output_bpp instead of link_bpp or
> just inlining intel_dp_output_bpp() at the single place it's used would
> be better, but in any case the patch looks ok:
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Iniling the helper for xelpd one, where we are using fractional bpp is
becoming a bit complicated.
Using identifier output_bpp instead of link_bpp seems better, since we
are deriving it using intel_dp_output_bpp().
Will send the patch with the 'output_bpp'.
Thanks & Regards,
Ankit
>
>>
>> /* Compressed BPP should be less than the Input DSC bpp */
>> - dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpp, pipe_bpp - 1);
>> + dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpp, link_bpp - 1);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp); i++) {
>> if (valid_dsc_bpp[i] < dsc_min_bpp)
>> @@ -2113,6 +2116,7 @@ xelpd_dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> u8 bppx16_incr = drm_dp_dsc_sink_bpp_incr(connector->dp.dsc_dpcd);
>> u16 compressed_bppx16;
>> u8 bppx16_step;
>> + int link_bpp;
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 14 || bppx16_incr <= 1)
>> @@ -2120,8 +2124,10 @@ xelpd_dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> else
>> bppx16_step = 16 / bppx16_incr;
>>
>> + link_bpp = intel_dp_output_bpp(pipe_config->output_format, pipe_bpp);
>> +
>> /* Compressed BPP should be less than the Input DSC bpp */
>> - dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpp << 4, (pipe_bpp << 4) - bppx16_step);
>> + dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpp << 4, (link_bpp << 4) - bppx16_step);
>> dsc_min_bpp = dsc_min_bpp << 4;
>>
>> for (compressed_bppx16 = dsc_max_bpp;
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 9:54 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Correct max compressed bpp bounds by using link bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2025-01-16 10:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:12 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:13 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:35 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:39 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 14:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-16 15:30 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2025-01-16 16:24 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-16 16:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-01-16 17:43 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-17 5:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a8b63c8-f6a7-4319-afd6-37408681b746@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox