From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Correct max compressed bpp bounds by using link bpp
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:41:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4k2ztPL6wS76Kf5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h65yg20r.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 06:24:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:24:16PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> >> While setting the bounds for compressed bpp we ensure that the
> >> compressed bpp is less than the pipe bpp.
> >>
> >> This gives an issue with 420 output format where effective link bpp is
> >> half that of the pipe bpp. Therefore instead of pipe bpp use link bpp to
> >> set the bounds for the compressed bpp.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 10 ++++++++--
> >
> > patches to i915, even when they target only platforms supported by
> > xe should also be sent to intel-gfx mainlinlist...
>
> Agreed... but this one was? :)
doh! my bad... I'm sorry...
my lei scripts goof-up + I probably need new glasses...
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> >
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >> index 1ad25c37f3c2..47fcfbcb893b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >> @@ -2068,9 +2068,12 @@ icl_dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> int timeslots)
> >> {
> >> int i, ret;
> >> + int link_bpp;
> >> +
> >> + link_bpp = intel_dp_output_bpp(pipe_config->output_format, pipe_bpp);
> >>
> >> /* Compressed BPP should be less than the Input DSC bpp */
> >> - dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpp, pipe_bpp - 1);
> >> + dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpp, link_bpp - 1);
> >>
> >> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp); i++) {
> >> if (valid_dsc_bpp[i] < dsc_min_bpp)
> >> @@ -2113,6 +2116,7 @@ xelpd_dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> u8 bppx16_incr = drm_dp_dsc_sink_bpp_incr(connector->dp.dsc_dpcd);
> >> u16 compressed_bppx16;
> >> u8 bppx16_step;
> >> + int link_bpp;
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 14 || bppx16_incr <= 1)
> >> @@ -2120,8 +2124,10 @@ xelpd_dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> else
> >> bppx16_step = 16 / bppx16_incr;
> >>
> >> + link_bpp = intel_dp_output_bpp(pipe_config->output_format, pipe_bpp);
> >> +
> >> /* Compressed BPP should be less than the Input DSC bpp */
> >> - dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpp << 4, (pipe_bpp << 4) - bppx16_step);
> >> + dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpp << 4, (link_bpp << 4) - bppx16_step);
> >> dsc_min_bpp = dsc_min_bpp << 4;
> >>
> >> for (compressed_bppx16 = dsc_max_bpp;
> >> --
> >> 2.45.2
> >>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 9:54 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Correct max compressed bpp bounds by using link bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2025-01-16 10:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:12 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:13 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:35 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:39 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 10:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-01-16 14:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-16 15:30 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2025-01-16 16:24 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-16 16:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-01-16 17:43 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-17 5:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4k2ztPL6wS76Kf5@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox