public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Don't pass the framebuffer to low level pinning functions
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:25:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <930d88df274c94811050a7c9f2bd132685bf2442@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416174448.28264-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 16 Apr 2026, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Now that we have the pin_params the low level pinning code no
> longer needs the entire framebuffer structure. The gem object
> alone (along with the pin_params) is enough.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.h   |  4 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c    |  6 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fb_pin.c            | 15 ++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c        | 28 ++++++++-----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.h
> index 95f83bf7411f..5825503c38ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.h
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
> -struct drm_framebuffer;
> +struct drm_gem_object;
>  struct i915_vma;
>  struct intel_plane_state;
>  struct i915_gtt_view;
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct intel_fb_pin_params {
>  };
>  
>  struct i915_vma *
> -intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> +intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>  		     const struct intel_fb_pin_params *pin_params,
>  		     int *out_fence_id);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
> index 4c3e54acde81..9ab0ac49abb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ int intel_fbdev_driver_fbdev_probe(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
>  		sizes->fb_height = fb->base.height;
>  	}
>  
> +	obj = intel_fb_bo(&fb->base);
> +
>  	/* Pin the GGTT vma for our access via info->screen_base.
>  	 * This also validates that any existing fb inherited from the
>  	 * BIOS is suitable for own access.
> @@ -317,7 +319,7 @@ int intel_fbdev_driver_fbdev_probe(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
>  						       DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0);
>  	pin_params.needs_low_address = intel_plane_needs_low_address(display);
>  
> -	vma = intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(&fb->base, &pin_params, NULL);
> +	vma = intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(obj, &pin_params, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(vma);
>  		goto out_unlock;
> @@ -328,8 +330,6 @@ int intel_fbdev_driver_fbdev_probe(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
>  
>  	info->fbops = &intelfb_ops;
>  
> -	obj = intel_fb_bo(&fb->base);
> -
>  	ret = intel_bo_fbdev_fill_info(obj, info, vma);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_unpin;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fb_pin.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fb_pin.c
> index 5060ec8c76ca..b0e121462ca3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fb_pin.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fb_pin.c
> @@ -23,12 +23,10 @@
>  #include "i915_vma.h"
>  
>  static struct i915_vma *
> -intel_fb_pin_to_dpt(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> -		    struct intel_dpt *dpt,
> +intel_fb_pin_to_dpt(struct drm_gem_object *_obj, struct intel_dpt *dpt,
>  		    const struct intel_fb_pin_params *pin_params)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(fb->dev);
> -	struct drm_gem_object *_obj = intel_fb_bo(fb);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(_obj->dev);
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = to_intel_bo(_obj);
>  	struct i915_address_space *vm = i915_dpt_to_vm(dpt);
>  	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
> @@ -108,12 +106,11 @@ intel_fb_pin_to_dpt(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>  }
>  
>  struct i915_vma *
> -intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> +intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(struct drm_gem_object *_obj,
>  		     const struct intel_fb_pin_params *pin_params,
>  		     int *out_fence_id)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(fb->dev);
> -	struct drm_gem_object *_obj = intel_fb_bo(fb);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(_obj->dev);
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = to_intel_bo(_obj);
>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
> @@ -275,7 +272,7 @@ int intel_plane_pin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
>  		};
>  		int fence_id = -1;
>  
> -		vma = intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(&fb->base, &pin_params,
> +		vma = intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(intel_fb_bo(&fb->base), &pin_params,
>  					   intel_plane_uses_fence(plane_state) ? &fence_id : NULL);
>  		if (IS_ERR(vma))
>  			return PTR_ERR(vma);
> @@ -295,7 +292,7 @@ int intel_plane_pin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
>  
>  		plane_state->ggtt_vma = vma;
>  
> -		vma = intel_fb_pin_to_dpt(&fb->base, fb->dpt, &pin_params);
> +		vma = intel_fb_pin_to_dpt(intel_fb_bo(&fb->base), fb->dpt, &pin_params);
>  		if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
>  			i915_dpt_unpin_from_ggtt(fb->dpt);
>  			plane_state->ggtt_vma = NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> index 44562769fbc9..5d7b30f62930 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> @@ -139,14 +139,13 @@ write_dpt_remapped(struct xe_bo *bo,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_dpt(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
> +static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_dpt(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>  			       const struct intel_fb_pin_params *pin_params,
>  			       struct i915_vma *vma)
>  {
> -	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(fb->base.dev);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(obj->dev);
>  	struct xe_tile *tile0 = xe_device_get_root_tile(xe);
>  	struct xe_ggtt *ggtt = tile0->mem.ggtt;
> -	struct drm_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_bo(&fb->base);
>  	const struct i915_gtt_view *view = pin_params->view;
>  	struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj), *dpt;
>  	u32 dpt_size, size = bo->ttm.base.size;
> @@ -268,14 +267,13 @@ static void write_ggtt_rotated_node(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct xe_ggtt_node *n
>  				   rot_info->plane[i].dst_stride);
>  }
>  
> -static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
> +static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>  				const struct intel_fb_pin_params *pin_params,
>  				struct i915_vma *vma)
>  {
> -	struct drm_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_bo(&fb->base);
>  	const struct i915_gtt_view *view = pin_params->view;
>  	struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
> -	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(fb->base.dev);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(obj->dev);
>  	struct xe_tile *tile0 = xe_device_get_root_tile(xe);
>  	struct xe_ggtt *ggtt = tile0->mem.ggtt;
>  	u64 pte, size;
> @@ -318,13 +316,11 @@ static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static struct i915_vma *__xe_pin_fb_vma(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb, bool is_dpt,
> +static struct i915_vma *__xe_pin_fb_vma(struct drm_gem_object *obj, bool is_dpt,
>  					const struct intel_fb_pin_params *pin_params)
>  {
> -	struct drm_device *dev = fb->base.dev;
> -	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(obj->dev);
>  	struct i915_vma *vma = kzalloc(sizeof(*vma), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	struct drm_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_bo(&fb->base);
>  	struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
>  	struct xe_validation_ctx ctx;
>  	struct drm_exec exec;
> @@ -376,9 +372,9 @@ static struct i915_vma *__xe_pin_fb_vma(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb, bool
>  
>  	vma->bo = bo;
>  	if (is_dpt)
> -		ret = __xe_pin_fb_vma_dpt(fb, pin_params, vma);
> +		ret = __xe_pin_fb_vma_dpt(obj, pin_params, vma);
>  	else
> -		ret = __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(fb, pin_params, vma);
> +		ret = __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(obj, pin_params, vma);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_unpin;
>  
> @@ -412,14 +408,14 @@ static void __xe_unpin_fb_vma(struct i915_vma *vma)
>  }
>  
>  struct i915_vma *
> -intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> +intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>  		     const struct intel_fb_pin_params *pin_params,
>  		     int *out_fence_id)
>  {
>  	if (out_fence_id)
>  		*out_fence_id = -1;
>  
> -	return __xe_pin_fb_vma(to_intel_framebuffer(fb), false, pin_params);
> +	return __xe_pin_fb_vma(obj, false, pin_params);
>  }
>  
>  void intel_fb_unpin_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, int fence_id)
> @@ -469,7 +465,6 @@ int intel_plane_pin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state,
>  	struct drm_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_bo(fb);
>  	struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
>  	struct i915_vma *vma;
> -	struct intel_framebuffer *intel_fb = to_intel_framebuffer(fb);
>  	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(new_plane_state->uapi.plane);
>  	struct intel_fb_pin_params pin_params = {
>  		.view = &new_plane_state->view.gtt,
> @@ -483,8 +478,7 @@ int intel_plane_pin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state,
>  	/* We reject creating !SCANOUT fb's, so this is weird.. */
>  	drm_WARN_ON(bo->ttm.base.dev, !(bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_FORCE_WC));
>  
> -	vma = __xe_pin_fb_vma(intel_fb, intel_fb_uses_dpt(&intel_fb->base),
> -			      &pin_params);
> +	vma = __xe_pin_fb_vma(obj, intel_fb_uses_dpt(fb), &pin_params);
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR(vma))
>  		return PTR_ERR(vma);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> index 4f0ad4692ed6..8e3c0c4b81fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ xe_initial_plane_setup(struct drm_plane_state *_plane_state,
>  		.view = &plane_state->view.gtt,
>  	};
>  
> -	vma = intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(fb, &pin_params, NULL);
> +	vma = intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(intel_fb_bo(fb), &pin_params, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(vma))
>  		return PTR_ERR(vma);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-17 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-16 17:44 [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: Eliminate FB usage from low level pinning code Ville Syrjala
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/xe/fb: Use the correct gtt view for remapped FBs Ville Syrjala
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Introduce struct intel_fb_pin_params Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17  9:40   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Extract intel_fb_needs_cpu_access() Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17  9:40   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Introduce pin_params.needs_cpu_lmem_access Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17  9:39   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-17 11:33     ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-17 16:19       ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Extract intel_plane_needs_low_address() Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17  9:43   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Introduce pin_params.needs_low_address Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17  9:48   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Introduce pin_params.needs_physical Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17  9:50   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Extract intel_plane_needs_fence() Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17  9:53   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Introduce pin_params.needs_fence Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17  9:58   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-17 12:25     ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/xe: Eliminate intel_fb_uses_dpt() call from __xe_pin_fb_vma() Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17 10:19   ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Don't pass the framebuffer to low level pinning functions Ville Syrjala
2026-04-17 10:25   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-04-16 17:52 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915: Eliminate FB usage from low level pinning code Patchwork
2026-04-16 18:51 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-16 20:43 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=930d88df274c94811050a7c9f2bd132685bf2442@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox