From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Make GUC binaries dump consistent with other binaries in devcoredump
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 10:17:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c1e56c4-4809-4f11-a41d-ecf6754de6ca@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250123180320.66198-3-jose.souza@intel.com>
On 1/23/2025 09:59, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> All other binaries follow this format:
> [name].length: 0x1000
> [name].data: xxxxxxx
> [name].error: errno
What is the purpose of including the name in []?
>
> The error ones is just in case by some reason was not able to capture
> binary.
>
> So this GuC binaries should follow the same patern.
>
> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index 50c8076b51585..497036675a38c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -1723,9 +1723,11 @@ void xe_guc_ct_snapshot_print(struct xe_guc_ct_snapshot *snapshot,
> drm_printf(p, "\tg2h outstanding: %d\n",
> snapshot->g2h_outstanding);
>
> - if (snapshot->ctb)
> - xe_print_blob_ascii85(p, "CTB data", '\n',
> + if (snapshot->ctb) {
> + drm_printf(p, "[CTB].length: 0x%lx\n", snapshot->ctb_size);
> + xe_print_blob_ascii85(p, "[CTB].data", '\n',
> snapshot->ctb, 0, snapshot->ctb_size);
> + }
> } else {
> drm_puts(p, "CT disabled\n");
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
> index 44482ea919924..462ec4bb98bb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
> @@ -204,10 +204,11 @@ void xe_guc_log_snapshot_print(struct xe_guc_log_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
> drm_printf(p, "GuC timestamp: 0x%08llX [%llu]\n", snapshot->stamp, snapshot->stamp);
> drm_printf(p, "Log level: %u\n", snapshot->level);
>
> + drm_printf(p, "[GUC].length: 0x%lx\n", snapshot->size);
> remain = snapshot->size;
> for (i = 0; i < snapshot->num_chunks; i++) {
> size_t size = min(GUC_LOG_CHUNK_SIZE, remain);
> - const char *prefix = i ? NULL : "Log data";
> + const char *prefix = i ? NULL : "[GUC].data";
This is not printing the GuC firmware image, it is the GuC log buffer.
It should be called 'Log' not 'GUC'.
John.
> char suffix = i == snapshot->num_chunks - 1 ? '\n' : 0;
>
> xe_print_blob_ascii85(p, prefix, suffix, snapshot->copy[i], 0, size);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-23 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 17:59 [PATCH 0/3] Enable GuC log dump and minor fixes in devcoredump José Roberto de Souza
2025-01-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Fix and re-enable xe_print_blob_ascii85() José Roberto de Souza
2025-01-23 18:20 ` John Harrison
2025-01-23 19:37 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-01-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Make GUC binaries dump consistent with other binaries in devcoredump José Roberto de Souza
2025-01-23 18:17 ` John Harrison [this message]
2025-01-23 18:45 ` Souza, Jose
2025-01-23 19:26 ` John Harrison
2025-01-23 19:12 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-01-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Drop duplicated information about GT tile " José Roberto de Souza
2025-01-23 18:18 ` John Harrison
2025-01-23 18:24 ` Souza, Jose
2025-01-23 18:30 ` John Harrison
2025-01-23 18:56 ` Souza, Jose
2025-01-23 19:27 ` John Harrison
2025-01-23 19:35 ` Souza, Jose
2025-01-23 20:59 ` John Harrison
2025-01-23 18:08 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Enable GuC log dump and minor fixes " Patchwork
2025-01-23 18:08 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-23 18:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-01-23 18:26 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-23 18:28 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-23 18:29 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2025-01-23 18:55 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-24 5:25 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c1e56c4-4809-4f11-a41d-ecf6754de6ca@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox