Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/display: Replace adjusted mode with pipe mode
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 22:01:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0DjMj3ASirtQUD9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241120053838.3794419-4-nemesa.garg@intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:08:35AM +0530, Nemesa Garg wrote:
> Replace adjusted_mode with pipe_mode in pch_panel_fitting
> so as to that final pipe src width and height is used after
> joiner calculation. De-couple the current intel_panel_fitting
> function, one pre-ilk and one post-ilk, as post-ilk
> pch_panel_fitting is called from pipe_config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  7 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pfit.c    | 59 +++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 9db255bb1230..6ad47cf0d419 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -4865,6 +4865,13 @@ copy_joiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		drm_dp_tunnel_ref_get(primary_crtc_state->dp_tunnel_ref.tunnel,
>  				      &secondary_crtc_state->dp_tunnel_ref);
>  
> +	if (secondary_crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled) {
> +		struct drm_rect *dst = &secondary_crtc_state->pch_pfit.dst;
> +		int y = dst->y1;
> +
> +		drm_rect_translate_to(dst, 0, y);
> +	}
> +
>  	copy_joiner_crtc_state_nomodeset(state, secondary_crtc);
>  
>  	secondary_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = primary_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pfit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pfit.c
> index fb6387b537b7..b2619e1c4021 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pfit.c
> @@ -181,18 +181,19 @@ static int pch_panel_fitting(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			     const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> -	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> -		&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> +	const struct drm_display_mode *pipe_mode =
> +		&crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode;
>  	int pipe_src_w = drm_rect_width(&crtc_state->pipe_src);
>  	int pipe_src_h = drm_rect_height(&crtc_state->pipe_src);
> -	int ret, x, y, width, height;
> +	int num_pipes = intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(crtc_state);
> +	int ret, x, y, width, height, hdisplay_full, src_w_full;
>  
>  	if (crtc_state->joiner_pipes)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/* Native modes don't need fitting */
> -	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay == pipe_src_w &&
> -	    adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay == pipe_src_h &&
> +	if (pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay == pipe_src_w &&
> +	    pipe_mode->crtc_vdisplay == pipe_src_h &&
>  	    crtc_state->output_format != INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420)
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -200,46 +201,66 @@ static int pch_panel_fitting(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	case DRM_MODE_SCALE_CENTER:
>  		width = pipe_src_w;
>  		height = pipe_src_h;
> -		x = (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay - width + 1)/2;
> -		y = (adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay - height + 1)/2;
> +		x = (pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay - width + 1) / 2;
> +		y = (pipe_mode->crtc_vdisplay - height + 1) / 2;
> +		/*
> +		 * The x-coordinate for Primary should be calculated in such a way
> +		 * that it remains consistent whether the pipes are joined or not.
> +		 * This means we need to consider the full width of the display even
> +		 * when the pipes are joined. The x-coordinate for secondaries is 0
> +		 * because it starts at the leftmost point of its own display area,
> +		 * ensuring that the framebuffer is centered within Pipe B’s portion
> +		 * of the overall display.
> +		 */
> +		if (intel_crtc_is_joiner_primary(crtc_state)) {
> +			hdisplay_full = pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay * num_pipes;
> +			src_w_full = width * num_pipes;
> +			x = (hdisplay_full - src_w_full + 1) / 2;
> +		}

Ugh. This stuff is getting quite nasty. I'm thinking it'll be a lot
cleaner if we in fact don't move the pch_panel_fitting() call from
its current location, and instead do something like this later:

joiner_adjust_pfit_dst()
{
	area = pipe_area();

	if (!pit.enable)
		return;

	rect_intersect(pfit.dst, area);
	rect_translate(pfit.dst, -area.x1, -area.y1);
}

where pipe_area() (or whatever we want to call it) gives you
per-pipe output area, relative to the origing of the full
joined output. It should look quite similar to a combination
of intel_joiner_adjust_pipe_src()+intel_joiner_adjust_pipe_src()
except using crtc_hdisplay/vdisplay instead of pipe_src.

I'm also wondering what would happed if we use mode=CENTER but
the pfit dst window doesn't extend into all of the joined
pipes? Dunno if there's any way to have a zero sized pipe_src 
for some of the pipes or not. If not I suppose we'll just have
to return an error...

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-22 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-20  5:38 [PATCH 0/6] Consider joiner calculation for panel fitting Nemesa Garg
2024-11-20  5:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/display: Disable joiner and pfit Nemesa Garg
2024-11-22 18:45   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-11-20  5:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] drm/i915/display: Add gmch_panel_fitting in all encoders Nemesa Garg
2024-11-22 18:47   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-11-22 18:48   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-11-20  5:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/display: Replace adjusted mode with pipe mode Nemesa Garg
2024-11-22 20:01   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-12-11  9:19     ` Garg, Nemesa
2024-11-20  5:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] drm/i915/display: Call panel_fitting from pipe_config Nemesa Garg
2024-11-20  5:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/dispaly: Allow joiner and pfit Nemesa Garg
2024-11-20  5:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/display: Initialize pipe_src in compute stage Nemesa Garg
2024-11-20  5:49 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Consider joiner calculation for panel fitting Patchwork
2024-11-20  5:49 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-11-20  5:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-11-20  6:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-20  6:11 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-20  6:12 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-20  6:33 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-20 17:04 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z0DjMj3ASirtQUD9@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=nemesa.garg@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox