From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] drm/xe/sa: Cleanup internal BO data at device removal
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 19:07:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1pTZ7fyXSs6aMmF@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241212010141.389-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 02:01:31AM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> The underlying buffer object used by the sub-allocator is
> device managed and it will be released on device removal.
> Thus we should not wait with cleanup of related BO members
> until drm cleanup, but do that at the same time as BO.
> Add another device action and move there related cleanups.
>
Kinda seems overkill to split this. I'd leave as is or just remove 'if
(!bo)' from xe_sa_bo_manager_fini.
Matt
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sa.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sa.c
> index eb314ca75355..a5e05237b646 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sa.c
> @@ -16,18 +16,19 @@
> static void xe_sa_bo_manager_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
> {
> struct xe_sa_manager *sa_manager = arg;
> - struct xe_bo *bo = sa_manager->bo;
> -
> - if (!bo) {
> - drm_err(drm, "no bo for sa manager\n");
> - return;
> - }
>
> drm_suballoc_manager_fini(&sa_manager->base);
> +}
> +
> +static void sa_bo_manager_fini_bo(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct xe_sa_manager *sa_manager = arg;
>
> if (sa_manager->is_iomem)
> kvfree(sa_manager->cpu_ptr);
>
> + sa_manager->cpu_ptr = NULL;
> + sa_manager->gpu_addr = 0;
> sa_manager->bo = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -66,6 +67,10 @@ struct xe_sa_manager *xe_sa_bo_manager_init(struct xe_tile *tile, u32 size, u32
> memset(sa_manager->cpu_ptr, 0, bo->ttm.base.size);
> }
>
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, sa_bo_manager_fini_bo, sa_manager);
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> drm_suballoc_manager_init(&sa_manager->base, managed_size, align);
> ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_sa_bo_manager_fini,
> sa_manager);
> --
> 2.47.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 1:01 [PATCH 00/13] The xe_sa_manager based GuC Buffer Cache Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/xe/sa: Always call drm_suballoc_manager_fini() Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:03 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/xe/sa: Drop redundant NULL assignments Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:03 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/xe/sa: Cleanup internal BO data at device removal Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:07 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/xe/sa: Drop useless is_iomem member Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:09 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-18 20:53 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/xe/sa: Improve error message on init failure Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:10 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/xe/sa: Tidy up coding style in init() Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:11 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/xe/sa: Allow making suballocations using custom gfp flags Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:12 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/xe/sa: Allow creating suballocator with custom guard size Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:23 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 21:57 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 22:48 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/xe/sa: Minor header cleanups Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:14 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/xe/guc: Introduce the GuC Buffer Cache Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:30 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 21:48 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-13 18:38 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-13 20:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-12-18 21:03 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-19 20:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/xe/pf: Use GuC Buffer Cache during VFs provisioning Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:34 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-12 22:02 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/xe/kunit: Allow to replace xe_managed_bo_create_pin_map() Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 1:01 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/xe/kunit: Add KUnit tests for GuC Buffer Cache Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 3:36 ` Matthew Brost
2024-12-18 21:06 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-12-12 2:20 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for The xe_sa_manager based " Patchwork
2024-12-12 2:20 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-12-12 2:21 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-12-12 2:41 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-12-12 2:45 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-12-12 2:48 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-12-12 3:14 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-12-12 8:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1pTZ7fyXSs6aMmF@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox