From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/mst: handle mst pbn_div in intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config()
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 23:34:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5vwTAiplbeI-Sm1@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734h080na.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:14:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 04:46:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Move mst_state->pbn_div calculation to intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config()
> >> to allow further refactoring.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 31 ++++++++++-----------
> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> >> index ea1b05224c06..8786c8751c82 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> >> @@ -216,15 +216,25 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> {
> >> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> >> struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->uapi.state;
> >> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state = NULL;
> >> struct intel_connector *connector =
> >> to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
> >> const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> >> &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> >> - fixed20_12 pbn_div;
> >> + bool is_mst = intel_dp->is_mst;
> >> int bpp, slots = -EINVAL;
> >> int dsc_slice_count = 0;
> >> int max_dpt_bpp;
> >>
> >> + if (is_mst) {^
> >> + mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
> >> + return PTR_ERR(mst_state);
> >> +
> >> + mst_state->pbn_div = drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(crtc_state->port_clock,
> >> + crtc_state->lane_count);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >
> > This could've been in the if (intel_dp->is_mst) block, since SST doesn't
> > use pbn_div. In any case the patch is correct:
>
> Uh, there's the if (is_mst)?
I meant the MST block below, but missed that it's within the loop
through bpps:/ So nvm my comment above.
> > Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> >
> >> if (dsc) {
> >> if (!intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, connector, crtc_state))
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> @@ -232,9 +242,6 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> crtc_state->fec_enable = !intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state);
> >> }
> >>
> >> - pbn_div = drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(crtc_state->port_clock,
> >> - crtc_state->lane_count);
> >> -
> >> max_dpt_bpp = intel_dp_mst_max_dpt_bpp(crtc_state, dsc);
> >> if (max_bpp > max_dpt_bpp) {
> >> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Limiting bpp to max DPT bpp (%d -> %d)\n",
> >> @@ -270,7 +277,7 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> link_bpp_x16,
> >> &crtc_state->dp_m_n);
> >>
> >> - if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> >> + if (is_mst) {
> >> int remote_bw_overhead;
> >> int remote_tu;
> >> fixed20_12 pbn;
> >> @@ -295,7 +302,7 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> pbn.full = dfixed_const(intel_dp_mst_calc_pbn(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> >> link_bpp_x16,
> >> remote_bw_overhead));
> >> - remote_tu = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn.full, pbn_div.full);
> >> + remote_tu = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn.full, mst_state->pbn_div.full);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Aligning the TUs ensures that symbols consisting of multiple
> >> @@ -313,7 +320,7 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> * allocated for the whole path and the TUs allocated for the
> >> * first branch device's link also applies here.
> >> */
> >> - pbn.full = remote_tu * pbn_div.full;
> >> + pbn.full = remote_tu * mst_state->pbn_div.full;
> >>
> >> drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, remote_tu < crtc_state->dp_m_n.tu);
> >> crtc_state->dp_m_n.tu = remote_tu;
> >> @@ -365,16 +372,6 @@ static int mst_stream_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> >> int step, bool dsc)
> >> {
> >> - struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->uapi.state;
> >> - struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state;
> >> -
> >> - mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr);
> >> - if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
> >> - return PTR_ERR(mst_state);
> >> -
> >> - mst_state->pbn_div = drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(crtc_state->port_clock,
> >> - crtc_state->lane_count);
> >> -
> >> return intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(intel_dp, crtc_state, conn_state,
> >> min_bpp, max_bpp, step, dsc);
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.39.5
> >>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-30 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 14:46 [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915: DP and DP MST cleanups Jani Nikula
2025-01-29 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/dp: constify struct link_config_limits pointers Jani Nikula
2025-01-30 13:47 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-29 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/dp: change the order of intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config() params Jani Nikula
2025-01-30 14:03 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-29 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/mst: change where lane_count and port_clock are set Jani Nikula
2025-01-30 14:16 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-29 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/mst: handle mst pbn_div in intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config() Jani Nikula
2025-01-30 14:23 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-30 21:14 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-30 21:34 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2025-01-29 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/mst: remove unnecessary mst_stream_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp() Jani Nikula
2025-01-30 14:25 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-29 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/mst: use min_array() and max_array() instead of hand-rolling Jani Nikula
2025-01-30 14:35 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-30 14:39 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 9:38 ` Raag Jadav
2025-01-29 16:31 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915/dp: constify struct link_config_limits pointers Patchwork
2025-01-29 16:32 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-29 16:33 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-29 16:49 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for drm/i915: DP and DP MST cleanups Patchwork
2025-01-29 16:51 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-29 16:53 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-29 17:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-01-30 0:24 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5vwTAiplbeI-Sm1@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox