Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Zhanjun Dong" <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] drm/xe/guc: Move xe_hw_engine_snapshot creation back to xe_hw_engine.c
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 17:43:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5wAq14aXXIccYhI@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250128183653.4027915-5-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:36:50AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> xe_devcoredump calls xe_engine_snapshot_capture_for_queue() to allocate
> and populate the xe_hw_engine_snapshot structure. Move that function
> back into xe_hw_engine.c since it doesn't make sense for
> GuC-Err-Capture to allocate a structure it doesn't own.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 30 -----------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.h |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c   | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h   |  3 +--
>  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> index a7278a01f586..6f40aad7e212 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> @@ -1866,36 +1866,6 @@ xe_guc_capture_get_matching_and_lock(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * xe_engine_snapshot_capture_for_queue - Take snapshot of associated engine
> - * @q: The exec queue object
> - *
> - * Take snapshot of associated HW Engine
> - *
> - * Returns: None.
> - */
> -void
> -xe_engine_snapshot_capture_for_queue(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> -{
> -	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(q->gt);
> -	struct xe_devcoredump *coredump = &xe->devcoredump;
> -	struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
> -	enum xe_hw_engine_id id;
> -	u32 adj_logical_mask = q->logical_mask;
> -
> -	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> -		return;
> -
> -	for_each_hw_engine(hwe, q->gt, id) {
> -		if (hwe->class != q->hwe->class ||
> -		    !(BIT(hwe->logical_instance) & adj_logical_mask)) {
> -			coredump->snapshot.hwe[id] = NULL;
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -		coredump->snapshot.hwe[id] = xe_hw_engine_snapshot_capture(hwe, q);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * xe_guc_capture_put_matched_nodes - Cleanup matched nodes
>   * @guc: The GuC object
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.h
> index e67589ab4342..77ee35a3f205 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ xe_guc_capture_get_matching_and_lock(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
>  void xe_guc_capture_snapshot_store_manual_job(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q);
>  void xe_guc_capture_snapshot_print(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_guc_capture_snapshot *node,
>  				   struct drm_printer *p);
> -void xe_engine_snapshot_capture_for_queue(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
>  void xe_guc_capture_steered_list_init(struct xe_guc *guc);
>  void xe_guc_capture_put_matched_nodes(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_guc_capture_snapshot *n);
>  int xe_guc_capture_init(struct xe_guc *guc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> index d615ebab6e42..40c1f9814177 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ void xe_hw_engine_handle_irq(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, u16 intr_vec)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * xe_hw_engine_snapshot_capture - Take a quick snapshot of the HW Engine.
> + * hw_engine_snapshot_capture - Take a quick snapshot of the HW Engine.
>   * @hwe: Xe HW Engine.
>   * @q: The exec queue object.
>   *
> @@ -840,8 +840,8 @@ void xe_hw_engine_handle_irq(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, u16 intr_vec)
>   * Returns: a Xe HW Engine snapshot object that must be freed by the
>   * caller, using `xe_hw_engine_snapshot_free`.
>   */
> -struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *
> -xe_hw_engine_snapshot_capture(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> +static struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *
> +hw_engine_snapshot_capture(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>  {
>  	struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot;
>  	struct xe_guc_capture_snapshot *node;
> @@ -885,6 +885,36 @@ xe_hw_engine_snapshot_capture(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>  	return snapshot;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * xe_engine_snapshot_capture_for_queue - Take snapshot of associated engine
> + * @q: The exec queue object
> + *
> + * Take snapshot of associated HW Engine
> + *
> + * Returns: None.
> + */
> +void
> +xe_engine_snapshot_capture_for_queue(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(q->gt);
> +	struct xe_devcoredump *coredump = &xe->devcoredump;
> +	struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
> +	enum xe_hw_engine_id id;
> +	u32 adj_logical_mask = q->logical_mask;
> +
> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> +		return;
> +
> +	for_each_hw_engine(hwe, q->gt, id) {
> +		if (hwe->class != q->hwe->class ||
> +		    !(BIT(hwe->logical_instance) & adj_logical_mask)) {
> +			coredump->snapshot.hwe[id] = NULL;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +		coredump->snapshot.hwe[id] = hw_engine_snapshot_capture(hwe, q);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * xe_hw_engine_snapshot_free - Free all allocated objects for a given snapshot.
>   * @snapshot: Xe HW Engine snapshot object.
> @@ -944,7 +974,7 @@ void xe_hw_engine_print(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct drm_printer *p)
>  {
>  	struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot;
>  
> -	snapshot = xe_hw_engine_snapshot_capture(hwe, NULL);
> +	snapshot = hw_engine_snapshot_capture(hwe, NULL);
>  	xe_engine_snapshot_print(snapshot, p);
>  	xe_hw_engine_snapshot_free(snapshot);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
> index fac2e9a421d9..845153fbc149 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
> @@ -55,8 +55,7 @@ void xe_hw_engine_handle_irq(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, u16 intr_vec);
>  void xe_hw_engine_enable_ring(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe);
>  u32 xe_hw_engine_mask_per_class(struct xe_gt *gt,
>  				enum xe_engine_class engine_class);
> -struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *
> -xe_hw_engine_snapshot_capture(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> +void xe_engine_snapshot_capture_for_queue(struct xe_exec_queue *q);

here as well. please respect the name space.

>  void xe_hw_engine_snapshot_free(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot);
>  void xe_engine_snapshot_print(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p);
>  void xe_hw_engine_print(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct drm_printer *p);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-30 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-28 18:36 [PATCH v6 0/6] Maintenence of devcoredump <-> GuC-Err-Capture plumbing Alan Previn
2025-01-28 18:36 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] drm/xe/guc: Rename __guc_capture_parsed_output Alan Previn
2025-01-30 22:37   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-01-31 18:44     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2025-02-10 19:01   ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-01-28 18:36 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/xe/guc: Don't store capture nodes in xe_devcoredump_snapshot Alan Previn
2025-01-30 17:57   ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2025-02-10 23:41   ` Dong, Zhanjun
2025-02-12 19:25     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2025-01-28 18:36 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] drm/xe/guc: Split engine state print between xe_hw_engine vs xe_guc_capture Alan Previn
2025-01-30 22:42   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-01-31 18:55     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2025-02-10 18:45       ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2025-01-28 18:36 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] drm/xe/guc: Move xe_hw_engine_snapshot creation back to xe_hw_engine.c Alan Previn
2025-01-30 22:43   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-01-31 18:56     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2025-01-28 18:36 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/xe/xe_hw_engine: Update hw_engine_snapshot_capture for debugfs Alan Previn
2025-01-28 20:45   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-28 18:36 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] drm/xe/guc: Update comments on GuC-Err-Capture flows Alan Previn
2025-01-28 21:19 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Maintenence of devcoredump <-> GuC-Err-Capture plumbing Patchwork
2025-01-28 21:21 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-28 21:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-01-28 21:38 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-28 21:40 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-28 21:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2025-01-28 22:01 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-29 12:54 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-30 17:13   ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z5wAq14aXXIccYhI@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox