Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	animesh.manna@intel.com, ville.syrjala@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/12] drm/i915/display: Evade scanline 0 as well if PSR1 or PSR2 is enabled
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:29:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6opd8zwCSCOwjf7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250127102846.1237560-10-jouni.hogander@intel.com>

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:28:43PM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> PIPEDSL is reading as 0 when in SRDENT(PSR1) or DEEP_SLEEP(PSR2). On
> wake-up scanline counting starts from vblank_start - 1. We don't know if
> wake-up is already ongoing when evasion starts. In worst case PIPEDSL could
> start reading valid value right after checking the scanline. In this
> scenario we wouldn't have enough time to write all registers. To tackle
> this evade scanline 0 as well. As a drawback we have 1 frame delay in flip
> when waking up.
> 
> v2:
>   - use intel_dsb_emit_wait_dsl
>   - add evasion of scanline 0 also for Panel Replay
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> index 30782ab0b9082..f15e6c2a195c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> @@ -538,6 +538,18 @@ void intel_dsb_vblank_evade(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	int latency = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode, 20);
>  	int start, end;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * PIPEDSL is reading as 0 when in SRDENT(PSR1) or DEEP_SLEEP(PSR2). On
> +	 * wake-up scanline counting starts from vblank_start - 1. We don't know
> +	 * if wake-up is already ongoing when evasion starts. In worst case
> +	 * PIPEDSL could start reading valid value right after checking the
> +	 * scanline. In this scenario we wouldn't have enough time to write all
> +	 * registers. To tackle this evade scanline 0 as well. As a drawback we
> +	 * have 1 frame delay in flip when waking up.
> +	 */
> +	if (crtc_state->has_psr)
> +		intel_dsb_emit_wait_dsl(dsb, DSB_OPCODE_WAIT_DSL_OUT, 0, 0);
> +
>  	if (pre_commit_is_vrr_active(state, crtc)) {
>  		int vblank_delay = intel_vrr_vblank_delay(crtc_state);
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-10 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-27 10:28 [PATCH v6 00/12] PSR DSB support Jouni Högander
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] drm/i915/psr: Use PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL CFF bit only to send full update Jouni Högander
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] drm/i915/psr: Rename psr_force_hw_tracking_exit as intel_psr_force_update Jouni Högander
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] drm/i915/psr: Split setting sff and cff bits away from intel_psr_force_update Jouni Högander
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] drm/i915/psr: Add register definitions for SFF_CTL and CFF_CTL registers Jouni Högander
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] drm/i915/psr: Use SFF_CTL on invalidate/flush for LunarLake onwards Jouni Högander
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] drm/i915/psr: Allow writing PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL using DSB Jouni Högander
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] drm/i915/psr: Changes for PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL handling when DSB is in use Jouni Högander
2025-02-10 16:26   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-02-11  6:24     ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-02-11 20:10       ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] drm/i915/psr: Remove DSB_SKIP_WAITS_EN chicken bit Jouni Högander
2025-02-10 16:28   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] drm/i915/display: Evade scanline 0 as well if PSR1 or PSR2 is enabled Jouni Högander
2025-02-10 16:29   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] drm/i915/psr: Add function for triggering "Frame Change" event Jouni Högander
2025-02-10 16:34   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] drm/i915/display: Ensure we have "Frame Change" event in DSB commit Jouni Högander
2025-02-10 16:34   ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-01-27 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] drm/i915/psr: Allow DSB usage when PSR is enabled Jouni Högander
2025-01-27 11:24 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for PSR DSB support (rev6) Patchwork
2025-01-27 11:25 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-27 11:26 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-27 11:42 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-27 11:44 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-27 11:46 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-27 12:05 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-01-27 13:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6opd8zwCSCOwjf7@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox