Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: lucas.demarchi@intel.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/9] xe & i915 display integration cleanups
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:33:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEBCGWMjfgsj/v0m@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230419123947.543175-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:39:38PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Change the way i915 display gets built for xe. Additional cleanups and
> backports on top to make future changes simpler.

Everything looks clean to me. Let's push this.

Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

I was going to do a local rebase --autosquash, but I will wait
this to land.

> 
> Jani Nikula (9):
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   drm/i915/wm: remove stale and unused ilk_wm_max_level() declaration
>   drm/i915/display: add I915 conditional build to i9xx_wm.h
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   drm/i915: rename intel_pm.[ch] to intel_clock_gating.[ch]
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   drm/i915: use explicit includes for i915_reg.h and i915_irq.h
>   fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support
>   fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                 |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.h        |  18 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |   4 +-
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c    |   1 +
>  .../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c   |   1 +
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_reg_defs.h |   4 -
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.h    |   1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c      |   1 +
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_fifo_underrun.c    |   2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c         |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c           |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c        |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c           |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c            |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c               |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c               |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.h               |   2 +-
>  .../i915/{intel_pm.c => intel_clock_gating.c} |   9 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_clock_gating.h     |  14 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h               |  18 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/vlv_suspend.c            |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile                   | 170 +++++++++---------
>  .../compat-i915-headers/intel_clock_gating.h  |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i915_irq.c     |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i9xx_wm.c      |  24 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i9xx_wm.h      |  20 ---
>  .../ext/{intel_pm.c => intel_clock_gating.c}  |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/intel_pm.h     |  29 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h          |   3 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c               |   4 +-
>  33 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-)
>  rename drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{intel_pm.c => intel_clock_gating.c} (99%)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_clock_gating.h
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_clock_gating.h
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i9xx_wm.c
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/i9xx_wm.h
>  rename drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/{intel_pm.c => intel_clock_gating.c} (97%)
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/intel_pm.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-19 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-19 12:39 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/9] xe & i915 display integration cleanups Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 21:56   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-20  8:49     ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-21 21:27       ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-24 11:41         ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/wm: remove stale and unused ilk_wm_max_level() declaration Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 19:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-19 19:49     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-19 19:50     ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/display: add I915 conditional build to i9xx_wm.h Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 19:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: rename intel_pm.[ch] to intel_clock_gating.[ch] Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: use explicit includes for i915_reg.h and i915_irq.h Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 19:36   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 8/9] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:39 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 9/9] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile Jani Nikula
2023-04-19 12:43 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe & i915 display integration cleanups Patchwork
2023-04-19 12:44 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-04-19 12:48 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-04-19 13:10 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-04-19 19:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-04-20 19:30 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/9] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-20 19:59   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-21 21:29 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for xe & i915 display integration cleanups (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZEBCGWMjfgsj/v0m@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox