From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Add exec_queue.sched_props.job_timeout_ms
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:14:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZUXdW+dXWnXaw93@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240102211731.6720-3-brian.welty@intel.com>
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 01:17:29PM -0800, Brian Welty wrote:
> The purpose here is to allow to optimize exec_queue_set_job_timeout()
> in follow-on patch. Currently it does q->ops->set_job_timeout(...).
> But we'd like to apply exec_queue_user_extensions much earlier and
> q->ops cannot be called before __xe_exec_queue_init().
>
> It will be much more efficient to instead only have to set
> q->sched_props.job_timeout_ms when applying user extensions. That value
> will then be used during q->ops->init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> index 94ae87540854..e78b13845417 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ static struct xe_exec_queue *__xe_exec_queue_alloc(struct xe_device *xe,
> q->sched_props.timeslice_us = hwe->eclass->sched_props.timeslice_us;
> q->sched_props.preempt_timeout_us =
> hwe->eclass->sched_props.preempt_timeout_us;
> + q->sched_props.job_timeout_ms =
> + hwe->eclass->sched_props.job_timeout_ms;
>
> if (xe_exec_queue_is_parallel(q)) {
> q->parallel.composite_fence_ctx = dma_fence_context_alloc(1);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> index 3d7e704ec3d9..882eb5373980 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {
> u32 timeslice_us;
> /** @preempt_timeout_us: preemption timeout in micro-seconds */
> u32 preempt_timeout_us;
> + /** @job_timeout_ms: job timeout in milliseconds */
> + u32 job_timeout_ms;
> } sched_props;
>
> /** @compute: compute exec queue state */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 21ac68e3246f..6cbf41ad9c8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> init_waitqueue_head(&ge->suspend_wait);
>
> timeout = (q->vm && xe_vm_in_lr_mode(q->vm)) ? MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT :
> - q->hwe->eclass->sched_props.job_timeout_ms;
> + q->sched_props.job_timeout_ms;
> err = xe_sched_init(&ge->sched, &drm_sched_ops, &xe_sched_ops,
> get_submit_wq(guc),
> q->lrc[0].ring.size / MAX_JOB_SIZE_BYTES, 64,
> @@ -1361,6 +1361,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_set_job_timeout(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 job_timeo
> xe_assert(xe, !exec_queue_banned(q));
> xe_assert(xe, !exec_queue_killed(q));
>
> + q->sched_props.job_timeout_ms = job_timeout_ms;
Patch LGTM but per my comment in [1] I think this vfunc can be deleted.
If we agree it can be, then no use adding this change in.
Matt
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/573052/?series=128128&rev=1
> sched->base.timeout = job_timeout_ms;
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 21:17 [PATCH 0/4] Refactor xe_exec_queue_create to fix user extensions Brian Welty
2024-01-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Refactor __xe_exec_queue_create() Brian Welty
2024-01-03 7:56 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe: Add exec_queue.sched_props.job_timeout_ms Brian Welty
2024-01-03 8:14 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-01-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe: Add exec_queue.sched_props.priority Brian Welty
2024-01-03 8:11 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-03 18:15 ` Welty, Brian
2024-01-03 18:29 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: Finish refactoring of exec_queue_create Brian Welty
2024-01-03 8:07 ` Matthew Brost
2024-01-03 18:16 ` Welty, Brian
2024-01-03 14:19 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Refactor xe_exec_queue_create to fix user extensions Patchwork
2024-01-03 14:19 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-01-03 14:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-01-03 14:28 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-01-03 14:28 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-01-03 14:29 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-01-03 15:05 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZUXdW+dXWnXaw93@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=brian.welty@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox