From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/xe: Don't support execlists in xe_gt_tlb_invalidation layer
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:16:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdiopL7khdFSJSXE@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222232021.3911545-4-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 03:20:21PM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> The xe_gt_tlb_invalidation layer implements TLB invalidations for a GuC
> backend. Simply return if in execlists mode. A follow up may properly
> implement the xe_gt_tlb_invalidation layer for both GuC and execlists.
>
> Fixes: a9351846d945 ("drm/xe: Break of TLB invalidation into its own file")
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> index 48bf5fdb0fbe..71ab03956670 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,14 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_vma(struct xe_gt *gt,
>
> xe_gt_assert(gt, vma);
>
> + /* Execlists not supported */
> + if (gt_to_xe(gt)->info.force_execlist) {
> + if (fence)
> + __invalidation_fence_signal(fence);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> action[len++] = XE_GUC_ACTION_TLB_INVALIDATION;
> action[len++] = 0; /* seqno, replaced in send_tlb_invalidation */
> if (!xe->info.has_range_tlb_invalidation) {
> @@ -354,6 +362,10 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_wait(struct xe_gt *gt, int seqno)
> struct xe_guc *guc = >->uc.guc;
> int ret;
>
> + /* Execlists not supported */
> + if (gt_to_xe(gt)->info.force_execlist)
> + return 0;
> +
> /*
> * XXX: See above, this algorithm only works if seqno are always in
> * order
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 23:20 [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix execlist mode Matthew Brost
2024-02-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/xe: Fix execlist splat Matthew Brost
2024-02-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/xe: Cleanup some layering in GGTT Matthew Brost
2024-02-23 14:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/xe: Don't support execlists in xe_gt_tlb_invalidation layer Matthew Brost
2024-02-23 14:16 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-02-22 23:32 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix execlist mode Patchwork
2024-02-22 23:32 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-02-22 23:33 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-02-22 23:45 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-02-22 23:46 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-02-22 23:47 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-02-23 0:10 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdiopL7khdFSJSXE@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox