From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
"Harrison, John C" <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
"Vishwanathapura,
Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>,
"Gupta, saurabhg" <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>,
"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Welty, Brian" <brian.welty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] drm/xe/lrc: Add xe lrc ring tail function definitions
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:44:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh2Dlx9hhQTTcuD9@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dde80e98a80b9fcfbd46c9dab4ef9bc27bc108f1.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 01:31:32PM -0600, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 11:46 -0700, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> > Add defintions for the functions xe_lrc_set_ring_tail and
> > xe_lrc_ring_tail to match the definitions for xe_lrc_set_ring_head
> > and
> > xe_lrc_ring_head, respectively, except tarting the lrc tail.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> > CC: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
> > CC: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
> > CC: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > index 615bbc372ac62..e91ecbcceba5c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > @@ -834,6 +834,16 @@ void xe_lrc_finish(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > xe_bo_put(lrc->bo);
> > }
> >
> > +void xe_lrc_set_ring_tail(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 tail)
> > +{
> > + xe_lrc_write_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_TAIL, tail);
> > +}
> > +
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ring_tail(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > +{
> > + return xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_TAIL) & TAIL_ADDR;
> > +}
> > +
> > void xe_lrc_set_ring_head(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 head)
> > {
>
> I see lower in xe_lrc.c we're doing this (xe_lrc_snapshot_capture):
> snapshot->tail.memory = xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_TAIL);
>
> Should we change this call to use the new wrapper also?
>
Yea. Also xe_guc_submit.c sets the LRC tail. It should be updated to use
the helper too.
Matt
> Thanks,
> Stuart
>
> > xe_lrc_write_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_HEAD, head);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> > index d32fa31faa2cf..f355b0eeb5658 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void xe_lrc_finish(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
> > size_t xe_lrc_size(struct xe_device *xe, enum xe_engine_class
> > class);
> > u32 xe_lrc_pphwsp_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
> >
> > +void xe_lrc_set_ring_tail(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 tail);
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ring_tail(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
> > void xe_lrc_set_ring_head(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 head);
> > u32 xe_lrc_ring_head(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
> > u32 xe_lrc_ring_space(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 18:46 [PATCH v5 1/4] drm/xe/lrc: Add xe lrc ring tail function definitions Jonathan Cavitt
2024-04-15 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] drm/xe/xe_guc_submit: Fix exec queue stop race condition Jonathan Cavitt
2024-04-15 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/xe/xe_guc_submit: Allow lr exec queues to be banned Jonathan Cavitt
2024-04-15 19:24 ` Summers, Stuart
2024-04-15 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] drm/xe/xe_guc_submit: Declare reset if banned or killed Jonathan Cavitt
2024-04-15 19:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] drm/xe/lrc: Add xe lrc ring tail function definitions Summers, Stuart
2024-04-15 19:44 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-04-15 20:26 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-04-15 20:29 ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-15 20:41 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-04-15 22:23 ` Summers, Stuart
2024-04-15 23:16 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v5,1/4] " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:16 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:29 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:31 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:33 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:59 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-04-16 15:54 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh2Dlx9hhQTTcuD9@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=brian.welty@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox