Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Cc: "Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Harrison, John C" <john.c.harrison@intel.com>,
	"Vishwanathapura,
	Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>,
	"Gupta, saurabhg" <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>,
	"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	"Welty, Brian" <brian.welty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] drm/xe/lrc: Add xe lrc ring tail function definitions
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:31:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dde80e98a80b9fcfbd46c9dab4ef9bc27bc108f1.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240415184608.2918959-1-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>

On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 11:46 -0700, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> Add defintions for the functions xe_lrc_set_ring_tail and
> xe_lrc_ring_tail to match the definitions for xe_lrc_set_ring_head
> and
> xe_lrc_ring_head, respectively, except tarting the lrc tail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> CC: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
> CC: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
> CC: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> index 615bbc372ac62..e91ecbcceba5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> @@ -834,6 +834,16 @@ void xe_lrc_finish(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
>         xe_bo_put(lrc->bo);
>  }
>  
> +void xe_lrc_set_ring_tail(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 tail)
> +{
> +       xe_lrc_write_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_TAIL, tail);
> +}
> +
> +u32 xe_lrc_ring_tail(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> +{
> +       return xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_TAIL) & TAIL_ADDR;
> +}
> +
>  void xe_lrc_set_ring_head(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 head)
>  {

I see lower in xe_lrc.c we're doing this (xe_lrc_snapshot_capture):
snapshot->tail.memory = xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_TAIL);

Should we change this call to use the new wrapper also?

Thanks,
Stuart

>         xe_lrc_write_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_RING_HEAD, head);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> index d32fa31faa2cf..f355b0eeb5658 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void xe_lrc_finish(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
>  size_t xe_lrc_size(struct xe_device *xe, enum xe_engine_class
> class);
>  u32 xe_lrc_pphwsp_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
>  
> +void xe_lrc_set_ring_tail(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 tail);
> +u32 xe_lrc_ring_tail(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
>  void xe_lrc_set_ring_head(struct xe_lrc *lrc, u32 head);
>  u32 xe_lrc_ring_head(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
>  u32 xe_lrc_ring_space(struct xe_lrc *lrc);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-15 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15 18:46 [PATCH v5 1/4] drm/xe/lrc: Add xe lrc ring tail function definitions Jonathan Cavitt
2024-04-15 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] drm/xe/xe_guc_submit: Fix exec queue stop race condition Jonathan Cavitt
2024-04-15 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/xe/xe_guc_submit: Allow lr exec queues to be banned Jonathan Cavitt
2024-04-15 19:24   ` Summers, Stuart
2024-04-15 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] drm/xe/xe_guc_submit: Declare reset if banned or killed Jonathan Cavitt
2024-04-15 19:31 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2024-04-15 19:44   ` [PATCH v5 1/4] drm/xe/lrc: Add xe lrc ring tail function definitions Matthew Brost
2024-04-15 20:26     ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-04-15 20:29       ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-15 20:41         ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-04-15 22:23           ` Summers, Stuart
2024-04-15 23:16 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v5,1/4] " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:16 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:29 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:31 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:33 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 23:59 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-04-16 15:54 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dde80e98a80b9fcfbd46c9dab4ef9bc27bc108f1.camel@intel.com \
    --to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --cc=brian.welty@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
    --cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox