From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/lnl: Apply Wa_22019338487
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:48:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zia_KMGV8RSqUL_Y@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6b3fb73-db62-49d7-8e91-cfb5fe094587@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:10:43AM -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
> On 4/22/2024 11:09 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 01:13:43PM GMT, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> > > This WA requires us to limit media GT frequency requests to a certain
> > > cap value during driver load as well as after driver unload. Freq limits
> > > are restored after driver load completes, so perf will not be
> > > affected during normal operations.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 6 +++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c | 8 +++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h | 3 +++
> > > 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > > index d85a2ba0a057..e29c152a6c4e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> > > #include "xe_gsc_proxy.h"
> > > #include "xe_gt.h"
> > > #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
> > > +#include "xe_guc_pc.h"
> > > #include "xe_hwmon.h"
> > > #include "xe_irq.h"
> > > #include "xe_memirq.h"
> > > @@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > {
> > > const unsigned int flr_timeout = 3 * MICRO; /* specs recommend a
> > > 3s wait */
> > > struct xe_gt *gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
> > > + struct xe_guc_pc *pc = >->uc.guc.pc;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > if (xe_mmio_read32(gt, GU_CNTL_PROTECTED) & DRIVERINT_FLR_DIS) {
> > > @@ -343,6 +345,10 @@ static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /* Set requested freq to mert_freq_cap before FLR */
> > > + if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc))
> > > + pc_set_cur_freq(pc, min(xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc),
> > > pc->rpe_freq));
> > > +
> > > drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Triggering Driver-FLR\n");
> > >
> > > /*
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
> > > index 60202b903687..556e73fca813 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > > #include "xe_gt.h"
> > > #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
> > > #include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> > > +#include "xe_guc_pc.h"
> > > #include "xe_huc.h"
> > > #include "xe_map.h"
> > > #include "xe_mmio.h"
> > > @@ -339,6 +340,7 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > struct xe_gsc *gsc = container_of(work, typeof(*gsc), work);
> > > struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
> > > struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> > > + struct xe_guc_pc *pc = >->uc.guc.pc;
> > > u32 actions;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -367,6 +369,12 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > if (actions & GSC_ACTION_SW_PROXY)
> > > xe_gsc_proxy_request_handler(gsc);
> > >
> > > + /* Revert the min/max freq limits as we're done with GSC/driver
> > > load */
> > > + if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc)) {
> > > + xe_guc_pc_set_max_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
> > > + xe_guc_pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rpe_freq);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > out:
> > > xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
> > > xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> > > index 521ae24f2314..7f82b6c2ad3c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> > > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
> > > #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
> > > #define GT_FREQUENCY_SCALER 3
> > >
> > > +#define LNL_MERT_FREQ_CAP 800
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * DOC: GuC Power Conservation (PC)
> > > *
> > > @@ -237,7 +239,7 @@ static void pc_set_manual_rp_ctrl(struct
> > > xe_guc_pc *pc, bool enable)
> > > xe_mmio_write32(gt, RP_CONTROL, state);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq)
> > > +void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq)
> > > {
> > > struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> > > u32 rpnswreq;
> > > @@ -673,6 +675,25 @@ static void pc_init_fused_rp_values(struct
> > > xe_guc_pc *pc)
> > > tgl_init_fused_rp_values(pc);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +bool xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> > > +{
> > > + struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
> > > + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> > > +
> > > + if (MEDIA_VERx100(xe) == 2000 && xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
> >
> > that's what xe_wa_oob.rules is for. Why are you adding it as a separate
> > function that won't allow debugfs/.../workarounds to match reality?
>
> The workarounds are not initialized at this point, this is early in the
> driver load process.
So we likely need to change that. or we will start to create a mess in terms
of handling the w/as.
But another comment on this w/a is that it is incomplete. It is just part
of the w/a here. We need to count the GGTT page table updates and with
a threshold update another mmio reg, or something like that.
also drop the freq at module unload, and other stuff, no?!
>
> Vinay.
>
> >
> > Lucas De Marchi
> >
> > > + return true;
> > > +
> > > + return false;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +u32 xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> > > +{
> > > + if (MEDIA_VERx100(pc_to_xe(pc)) == 2000)
> > > + return LNL_MERT_FREQ_CAP;
> > > + else
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * xe_guc_pc_init_early - Initialize RPx values and request a higher GT
> > > * frequency to allow faster GuC load times
> > > @@ -684,7 +705,11 @@ void xe_guc_pc_init_early(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> > >
> > > xe_force_wake_assert_held(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> > > pc_init_fused_rp_values(pc);
> > > - pc_set_cur_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
> > > +
> > > + if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc))
> > > + pc_set_cur_freq(pc, min(xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc),
> > > pc->rp0_freq));
> > > + else
> > > + pc_set_cur_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> > > @@ -715,6 +740,17 @@ static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct
> > > xe_guc_pc *pc)
> > > if (pc_get_min_freq(pc) > pc->rp0_freq)
> > > ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
> > >
> > > + if ((!ret) && xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc)) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Setting min to RPn disables use of efficient freq
> > > + * which could otherwise interfere with this WA for media GT.
> > > + * We will also bind max to MERT_FREQ_CAP until driver loads.
> > > + */
> > > + ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rpn_freq);
> > > + if (!ret)
> > > + ret = pc_set_max_freq(pc, min(pc->rp0_freq,
> > > xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc)));
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > out:
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> > > index d3680d89490e..25fe693c7ee3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> > > @@ -27,4 +27,7 @@ enum xe_gt_idle_state xe_guc_pc_c_status(struct
> > > xe_guc_pc *pc);
> > > u64 xe_guc_pc_rc6_residency(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> > > u64 xe_guc_pc_mc6_residency(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> > > void xe_guc_pc_init_early(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> > > +void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq);
> > > +bool xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> > > +u32 xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> > > #endif /* _XE_GUC_PC_H_ */
> > > --
> > > 2.38.1
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 20:13 [PATCH 0/2] Apply LNL workaround Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-04-19 20:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/lnl: Apply Wa_22019338487 Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-04-22 18:09 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-22 18:10 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-04-22 19:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-04-22 21:10 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-05-14 14:36 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-05-14 17:24 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-04-23 16:40 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-04-23 17:43 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-23 19:51 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-04-24 0:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-19 20:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/bmg: Apply Wa_22019338487 for BMG Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-04-20 4:34 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Apply LNL workaround Patchwork
2024-04-20 4:35 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-20 4:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-20 4:51 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-20 4:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-20 5:04 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-24 23:41 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe: Apply Wa_22019338487 Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-05-24 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/lnl: " Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-05-28 19:58 ` Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zia_KMGV8RSqUL_Y@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox