From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/lnl: Apply Wa_22019338487
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:10:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b50a93a2-d361-4561-808a-7efd940afd59@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6b3fb73-db62-49d7-8e91-cfb5fe094587@intel.com>
On 22-04-2024 23:40, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
> On 4/22/2024 11:09 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 01:13:43PM GMT, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>>> This WA requires us to limit media GT frequency requests to a certain
>>> cap value during driver load as well as after driver unload. Freq limits
>>> are restored after driver load completes, so perf will not be
>>> affected during normal operations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 6 +++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c | 8 +++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h | 3 +++
>>> 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> index d85a2ba0a057..e29c152a6c4e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>>> #include "xe_gsc_proxy.h"
>>> #include "xe_gt.h"
>>> #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
>>> +#include "xe_guc_pc.h"
>>> #include "xe_hwmon.h"
>>> #include "xe_irq.h"
>>> #include "xe_memirq.h"
>>> @@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> {
>>> const unsigned int flr_timeout = 3 * MICRO; /* specs recommend a
>>> 3s wait */
>>> struct xe_gt *gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
>>> + struct xe_guc_pc *pc = >->uc.guc.pc;
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> if (xe_mmio_read32(gt, GU_CNTL_PROTECTED) & DRIVERINT_FLR_DIS) {
>>> @@ -343,6 +345,10 @@ static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /* Set requested freq to mert_freq_cap before FLR */
>>> + if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc))
>>> + pc_set_cur_freq(pc, min(xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc),
>>> pc->rpe_freq));
>>> +
>>> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Triggering Driver-FLR\n");
>>>
>>> /*
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
>>> index 60202b903687..556e73fca813 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>> #include "xe_gt.h"
>>> #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
>>> #include "xe_gt_printk.h"
>>> +#include "xe_guc_pc.h"
>>> #include "xe_huc.h"
>>> #include "xe_map.h"
>>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>>> @@ -339,6 +340,7 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> struct xe_gsc *gsc = container_of(work, typeof(*gsc), work);
>>> struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
>>> struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>>> + struct xe_guc_pc *pc = >->uc.guc.pc;
>>> u32 actions;
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -367,6 +369,12 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> if (actions & GSC_ACTION_SW_PROXY)
>>> xe_gsc_proxy_request_handler(gsc);
>>>
>>> + /* Revert the min/max freq limits as we're done with GSC/driver
>>> load */
>>> + if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc)) {
>>> + xe_guc_pc_set_max_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>> + xe_guc_pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rpe_freq);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> out:
>>> xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
>>> xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> index 521ae24f2314..7f82b6c2ad3c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
>>> #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
>>> #define GT_FREQUENCY_SCALER 3
>>>
>>> +#define LNL_MERT_FREQ_CAP 800
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * DOC: GuC Power Conservation (PC)
>>> *
>>> @@ -237,7 +239,7 @@ static void pc_set_manual_rp_ctrl(struct
>>> xe_guc_pc *pc, bool enable)
>>> xe_mmio_write32(gt, RP_CONTROL, state);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq)
>>> +void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq)
>>> {
>>> struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
>>> u32 rpnswreq;
>>> @@ -673,6 +675,25 @@ static void pc_init_fused_rp_values(struct
>>> xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> tgl_init_fused_rp_values(pc);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +bool xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> +{
>>> + struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
>>> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>>> +
>>> + if (MEDIA_VERx100(xe) == 2000 && xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
>>
>> that's what xe_wa_oob.rules is for. Why are you adding it as a separate
>> function that won't allow debugfs/.../workarounds to match reality?
>
> The workarounds are not initialized at this point, this is early in the
> driver load process.
With below steps xe_wa_oob should work for your Wa.
1. Add "22019338487 MEDIA_VERSION(2000)" to
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
2. #include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h> at the top.
3. if (XE_WA(gt, 22019338487) && xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
Regards,
Badal
>
> Vinay.
>
>>
>> Lucas De Marchi
>>
>>> + return true;
>>> +
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +u32 xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> +{
>>> + if (MEDIA_VERx100(pc_to_xe(pc)) == 2000)
>>> + return LNL_MERT_FREQ_CAP;
>>> + else
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * xe_guc_pc_init_early - Initialize RPx values and request a higher GT
>>> * frequency to allow faster GuC load times
>>> @@ -684,7 +705,11 @@ void xe_guc_pc_init_early(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>>
>>> xe_force_wake_assert_held(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
>>> pc_init_fused_rp_values(pc);
>>> - pc_set_cur_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>> +
>>> + if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc))
>>> + pc_set_cur_freq(pc, min(xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc),
>>> pc->rp0_freq));
>>> + else
>>> + pc_set_cur_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> @@ -715,6 +740,17 @@ static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct
>>> xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> if (pc_get_min_freq(pc) > pc->rp0_freq)
>>> ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>>
>>> + if ((!ret) && xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc)) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Setting min to RPn disables use of efficient freq
>>> + * which could otherwise interfere with this WA for media GT.
>>> + * We will also bind max to MERT_FREQ_CAP until driver loads.
>>> + */
>>> + ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rpn_freq);
>>> + if (!ret)
>>> + ret = pc_set_max_freq(pc, min(pc->rp0_freq,
>>> xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc)));
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> out:
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>>> index d3680d89490e..25fe693c7ee3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>>> @@ -27,4 +27,7 @@ enum xe_gt_idle_state xe_guc_pc_c_status(struct
>>> xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> u64 xe_guc_pc_rc6_residency(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> u64 xe_guc_pc_mc6_residency(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> void xe_guc_pc_init_early(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> +void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq);
>>> +bool xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> +u32 xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> #endif /* _XE_GUC_PC_H_ */
>>> --
>>> 2.38.1
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 20:13 [PATCH 0/2] Apply LNL workaround Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-04-19 20:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/lnl: Apply Wa_22019338487 Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-04-22 18:09 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-22 18:10 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-04-22 19:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-22 21:10 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-05-14 14:36 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-05-14 17:24 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-04-23 16:40 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2024-04-23 17:43 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-23 19:51 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-04-24 0:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-19 20:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/bmg: Apply Wa_22019338487 for BMG Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-04-20 4:34 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Apply LNL workaround Patchwork
2024-04-20 4:35 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-20 4:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-04-20 4:51 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-20 4:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-20 5:04 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-24 23:41 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe: Apply Wa_22019338487 Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-05-24 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/lnl: " Vinay Belgaumkar
2024-05-28 19:58 ` Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b50a93a2-d361-4561-808a-7efd940afd59@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox