From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Michal Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [CI] HAX: Try SR-IOV on ADLP/ATSM
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:51:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zn8GQZo5Qh8oHvIn@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240624120203.1169-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 02:02:03PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> This is for CI only. DO NOT REVIEW. DO NOT MERGE.
how are these tests looking like at this moment?
I'm wondering if it is already time to add this patch to topic/xe-for-CI
Thomas? Lucas? thoughts?
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> index 893858a2eea0..c0cf3b8ad815 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct xe_modparam xe_modparam = {
> .enable_display = true,
> .guc_log_level = 5,
> .force_probe = CONFIG_DRM_XE_FORCE_PROBE,
> + .max_vfs = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG) ? ~0 : 0,
> .wedged_mode = 1,
> /* the rest are 0 by default */
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index ebff5ea79b1d..488a444b7b5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc adl_p_desc = {
> { XE_SUBPLATFORM_ALDERLAKE_P_RPLU, "RPLU", adlp_rplu_ids },
> {},
> },
> + .has_sriov = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG),
> };
>
> static const struct xe_device_desc adl_n_desc = {
> @@ -307,6 +308,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc ats_m_desc = {
>
> DG2_FEATURES,
> .has_display = false,
> + .has_sriov = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG),
> };
>
> static const struct xe_device_desc dg2_desc = {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-28 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-24 12:02 [CI] HAX: Try SR-IOV on ADLP/ATSM Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-24 12:36 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-06-24 12:36 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-24 12:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-24 12:50 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-24 12:52 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-24 12:53 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-24 13:16 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-06-24 15:16 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-28 18:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-06-28 20:22 ` [CI] " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-28 20:58 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-07-01 11:00 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-07-02 16:02 ` Thomas Hellström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zn8GQZo5Qh8oHvIn@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox