Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor joiner max_bpp calculations into separate functions
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:27:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zvakz94IAlOyLQM0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927083831.3913645-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 02:08:25PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Currently compressed max_bpp limitations for small joiner ram, big joiner
> and others are intermingled. Separate them into distinct functions to
> enhance clarity and maintainability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index f2a2541c1091..7db037f631f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -859,23 +859,52 @@ u32 intel_dp_dsc_nearest_valid_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 bpp, u32 p
>  	return bits_per_pixel;
>  }
>  
> +static int get_bigjoiner_interface_bits(struct intel_display *display)

I would s/get_// in the name.

> +{
> +	return DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14 ? 36 : 24;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 bigjoiner_bw_max_bpp(struct intel_display *display, u32 mode_clock,
> +				int num_joined_pipes)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> +	int bigjoiner_interface_bits = get_bigjoiner_interface_bits(display);

You don't really need the local variable for this.

> +	int num_bigjoiners = num_joined_pipes / 2;
> +	u32 max_bpp;
> +	/* With bigjoiner multiple dsc engines are used in parallel so PPC is 2 */
> +	int ppc = 2;
> +
> +	max_bpp = i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq * ppc * bigjoiner_interface_bits /

s/i915->display./display->/

> +		  intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
> +
> +	max_bpp *= num_bigjoiners;

This thing wasn't in the original code, so should be added separately
IMO.

> +
> +	return max_bpp;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 small_joiner_ram_max_bpp(struct intel_display *display, u32 mode_hdisplay)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> +	u32 max_bpp;
> +
> +	/* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
> +	max_bpp = small_joiner_ram_size_bits(i915) / mode_hdisplay;
> +
> +	return max_bpp;
> +}
> +
>  static
>  u32 get_max_compressed_bpp_with_joiner(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  				       u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
>  				       int num_joined_pipes)
>  {
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(&i915->drm);
>  	u32 max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
>  
> -	/* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
> -	max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = small_joiner_ram_size_bits(i915) / mode_hdisplay;
> +	max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = small_joiner_ram_max_bpp(display, mode_hdisplay);
>  
>  	if (num_joined_pipes == 2) {
> -		int bigjoiner_interface_bits = DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14 ? 36 : 24;
> -		/* With bigjoiner multiple dsc engines are used in parallel so PPC is 2 */
> -		int ppc = 2;
> -		u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner =
> -			i915->display.cdclk.max_cdclk_freq * ppc * bigjoiner_interface_bits /
> -			intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
> +		u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner = bigjoiner_bw_max_bpp(display, mode_clock, num_joined_pipes);
>  
>  		max_bpp_small_joiner_ram *= 2;

That multiplication should be inside small_joiner_ram_max_bpp().

>  
> -- 
> 2.45.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-27 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-27  8:38 [PATCH 00/17] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915/display_device: Add Check HAS_DSC for bigjoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915/display_debugfs: Allow force joiner only if supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 03/17] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to compute num pipes required Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 05/17] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_ULTRAJOINER() Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 09/17] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor joiner max_bpp calculations into separate functions Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 12:27   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 12/17] drm/i915/dp: Simplify the helper get_max_compressed_bpp_with_joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 12:31   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-27 12:38     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915/dp: Modify compressed bpp limitations for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 10:39   ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-27 12:41   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915/dp: Simplify helper to get slice count with joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 15/17] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:43 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev5) Patchwork
2024-09-27  8:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-27  8:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-27  8:56 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-27  8:58 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-27  9:00 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-27  9:17 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-28  3:58 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-27 15:22 [PATCH 00/17] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor joiner max_bpp calculations into separate functions Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:43   ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zvakz94IAlOyLQM0@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox