Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Bommu Krishnaiah" <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/ufence: ufence can be signaled right after wait_woken
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 02:07:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwnZ6FZQVcvwuPuW@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011151029.4160630-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 05:10:29PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> do_comapre() can return success after a timedout wait_woken() which was
> treated as -ETIME. The loop calling wait_woken() sets correct err so
> there is no need to re-evaluate err.
> 
> v2: Remove entire check that reevaluate err at the end(Matt)
> 
> Fixes: e670f0b4ef24 ("drm/xe/uapi: Return correct error code for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl")
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1630
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8+
> Cc: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c
> index d46fa8374980..f5deb81eba01 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c
> @@ -169,9 +169,6 @@ int xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  			args->timeout = 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!timeout && !(err < 0))
> -		err = -ETIME;
> -
>  	if (q)
>  		xe_exec_queue_put(q);
>  
> -- 
> 2.46.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-12  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-11 15:10 [PATCH v2] drm/xe/ufence: ufence can be signaled right after wait_woken Nirmoy Das
2024-10-11 19:54 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/ufence: ufence can be signaled right after wait_woken (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-11 19:54 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-11 19:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-11 20:11 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-11 20:13 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-11 20:15 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-12  2:07 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-10-12  2:35 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-14  8:06   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-14  7:53 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe/ufence: ufence can be signaled right after wait_woken Matthew Auld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZwnZ6FZQVcvwuPuW@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox