Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/display: Fix the plane max height and width limits
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:04:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxtRINBKqu7aEz6L@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01ab01ee-8a41-404c-bd8f-548c4e7ee296@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 12:54:45PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> 
> On 10/25/2024 11:51 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 11:31:32AM +0530, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> >> Fix the plane max height and width limits taking into account the
> >> joined pipe limits too.
> >>
> >> Bspec: 28692, 49199, 68858
> >> Fixes: 63dc014e37b9 ("drm/i915/dp: Allow big joiner modes in intel_dp_mode_valid(), v3.")
> >> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> >>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> index ef1436146325..fc578af4f394 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -8450,9 +8450,22 @@ intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>   	 * plane so let's not advertize modes that are
> >>   	 * too big for that.
> >>   	 */
> >> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> >> -		plane_width_max = 5120 * num_joined_pipes;
> >> -		plane_height_max = 4320;
> >> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20) {
> >> +		if (num_joined_pipes > 1) {
> >> +			plane_width_max = 8192;
> >> +			plane_height_max = 4800;
> >> +		} else {
> >> +			plane_width_max = 5120;
> >> +			plane_height_max = 4096;
> > The joiner operates on horizontal lines. Why would the
> > vertical resolution change here?
> >
> > And this is breaking ultrajoiner now.
> 
> Yeah this will complicate function to check whether go to ultrajoiner or 
> bigjoiner.
> 
> Perhaps need to have separate function for max_joined_plane_width() and 
> max_unjoined_plane_width();

I don't think max plane sizes have anything to with joiner. In fact
we should probably make this code just ask the "primary" plane its
max dimensions and then just multiply that with the number of joined
pipes. Any other joiner specific limits should be handled elsewhere.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-25  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-25  6:01 [PATCH 0/5] Add 6k resolution support for a single CRTC Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-25  6:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/display: Fix the plane max height and width limits Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-25  6:21   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-10-25  6:26     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-25  7:15       ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-10-25  7:24     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-10-25  8:04       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-10-28  4:13         ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-25  6:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Increase resolution for plane to support 6k Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-25  6:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/psr: Increase psr size limits for Xe2 Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-25 22:01   ` Matt Roper
2024-10-28  3:51     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-28  7:22       ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-10-28  5:00     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-25  6:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Increase max_h max_v for PSR Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-25  6:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i914/xe3lpd: Increase bigjoiner limitations Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-25  6:07 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add 6k resolution support for a single CRTC (rev3) Patchwork
2024-10-25  6:08 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-25  6:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-25  6:20 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-25  6:23 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-25  6:24 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-25  6:46 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-26 16:11 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZxtRINBKqu7aEz6L@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox