From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] drm/xe: Add helper function to inject fault into ct_dead_capture()
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:04:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0c92aa2-ed7d-41f0-8d7c-b66b36be3fa7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250524144613.11970-1-satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
On 5/24/2025 7:46 AM, Satyanarayana K V P wrote:
> When injecting fault to xe_guc_ct_send_recv() & xe_guc_mmio_send_recv()
> functions, the CI test systems are going out of space and crashing. To
> avoid this issue, a new helper function is created and when fault is
> injected into this xe_inject_fault() helper function, ct dead capture
> is avoided which suppresses ct dumps in the log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
This seems like the simplest and cleanest solution to me (for both the
KMD and the IGT sides). I don't know if Jani or Michal still have
objections to it.
John.
> ---
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> V5 -> V6:
> - Fixed review comments.
> - Updated helper function description.
>
> V4 -> V5:
> - Fixed review comments.
>
> V3 -> V4:
> - Updated the name of helper function and moved to xe_device.h file.
>
> V2 -> V3:
> - Added inline function to avoid compilation error in the absence of
> CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION.
>
> V1 -> V2:
> - Fixed review comments.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> index 0bc3bc8e6803..9dd31facc9d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,23 @@ void xe_device_declare_wedged(struct xe_device *xe);
> struct xe_file *xe_file_get(struct xe_file *xef);
> void xe_file_put(struct xe_file *xef);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION
> +/*
> + * This is a helper function which assists the driver in identifying if a fault
> + * injection test is currently active, allowing it to reduce unnecessary debug
> + * output. Typically, the function returns zero, but the fault injection
> + * framework can alter this to return an error. Since faults are injected
> + * through this function, it's important to ensure the compiler doesn't optimize
> + * it into an inline function. To avoid such optimization, the 'noinline'
> + * attribute is applied.
> + */
> +
> +static noinline int xe_is_injection_active(void) { return 0; }
> +ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(xe_is_injection_active, ERRNO);
> +#else
> +static inline int xe_is_injection_active(void) { return 0; }
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Occasionally it is seen that the G2H worker starts running after a delay of more than
> * a second even after being queued and activated by the Linux workqueue subsystem. This
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index 822f4c33f730..89f992feba31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -2040,6 +2040,12 @@ static void ct_dead_capture(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, struct guc_ctb *ctb, u32 reaso
>
> if (ctb)
> ctb->info.broken = true;
> + /*
> + * Huge dump is getting generated when injecting error for guc CT/MMIO
> + * functions. So, let us suppress the dump when fault is injected.
> + */
> + if (xe_is_injection_active())
> + return;
>
> /* Ignore further errors after the first dump until a reset */
> if (ct->dead.reported)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-24 14:46 [PATCH v6] drm/xe: Add helper function to inject fault into ct_dead_capture() Satyanarayana K V P
2025-05-24 14:35 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add helper function to inject fault into ct_dead_capture() (rev6) Patchwork
2025-05-24 14:35 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-05-24 14:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-05-24 14:47 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-05-24 14:49 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-05-24 14:51 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-05-24 15:12 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-05-24 23:52 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-06-05 20:04 ` John Harrison [this message]
2025-06-06 13:19 ` [PATCH v6] drm/xe: Add helper function to inject fault into ct_dead_capture() Jani Nikula
2025-06-07 0:06 ` John Harrison
2025-06-11 7:35 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0c92aa2-ed7d-41f0-8d7c-b66b36be3fa7@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox