From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: "simon.richter@hogyros.de" <simon.richter@hogyros.de>,
"Auld, Matthew" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/xe: Enable 2M pages in xe_migrate_vram
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 17:08:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a435a2a974b8627c945471e75c4dc21b835e9d22.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013034555.4121168-3-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Sun, 2025-10-12 at 20:45 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Using 2M pages in xe_migrate_vram has two benefits: we issue fewer
> instructions per 2M copy (1 vs. 512), and the cache hit rate should
> be
> higher. This results in increased copy engine bandwidth, as shown by
> benchmark IGTs.
>
> Enable 2M pages by reserving PDEs in the migrate VM and using 2M
> pages
> in xe_migrate_vram if the DMA address order matches 2M.
>
> v2:
> - Reuse build_pt_update_batch_sram (Stuart)
> - Fix build_pt_update_batch_sram for PAGE_SIZE > 4K
> v3:
> - More fixes for PAGE_SIZE > 4K, align chunk, decrement chunk as
> needed
> - Use stack incr var in xe_migrate_vram_use_pde (Stuart)
> v4:
> - Split PAGE_SIZE > 4K fix out in different patch (Stuart)
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> --
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> index 216fc0ec2bb7..4ca48dd1cfd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,13 @@ struct xe_migrate {
> u64 usm_batch_base_ofs;
> /** @cleared_mem_ofs: VM offset of @cleared_bo. */
> u64 cleared_mem_ofs;
> + /** @large_page_copy_ofs: VM offset of 2M pages used for
> large copies */
> + u64 large_page_copy_ofs;
> + /**
> + * @large_page_copy_pdes: BO offset to writeout 2M pages
> (PDEs) used for
> + * large copies
> + */
> + u64 large_page_copy_pdes;
> /**
> * @fence: dma-fence representing the last migration job
> batch.
> * Protected by @job_mutex.
> @@ -288,6 +295,12 @@ static int xe_migrate_prepare_vm(struct xe_tile
> *tile, struct xe_migrate *m,
> (i + 1) * 8, u64, entry);
> }
>
> + /* Reserve 2M PDEs */
> + level = 1;
> + m->large_page_copy_ofs = NUM_PT_SLOTS << xe_pt_shift(level);
> + m->large_page_copy_pdes = map_ofs + XE_PAGE_SIZE * level +
> + NUM_PT_SLOTS * 8;
> +
> /* Set up a 1GiB NULL mapping at 255GiB offset. */
> level = 2;
> xe_map_wr(xe, &bo->vmap, map_ofs + XE_PAGE_SIZE * level + 255
> * 8, u64,
> @@ -1778,10 +1791,10 @@ static u32 pte_update_cmd_size(u64 size)
> static void build_pt_update_batch_sram(struct xe_migrate *m,
> struct xe_bb *bb, u32
> pt_offset,
> struct drm_pagemap_addr
> *sram_addr,
> - u32 size)
> + u32 size, int level)
> {
> u16 pat_index = tile_to_xe(m->tile)->pat.idx[XE_CACHE_WB];
> - u64 gpu_page_size = 0x1ull << xe_pt_shift(0);
> + u64 gpu_page_size = 0x1ull << xe_pt_shift(level);
> u32 ptes;
> int i = 0;
>
> @@ -1808,7 +1821,7 @@ static void build_pt_update_batch_sram(struct
> xe_migrate *m,
> again:
> pte = m->q->vm->pt_ops->pte_encode_addr(m-
> >tile->xe,
> addr,
> pat_index,
> - 0,
> false, 0);
> + level
> , false, 0);
> bb->cs[bb->len++] = lower_32_bits(pte);
> bb->cs[bb->len++] = upper_32_bits(pte);
>
> @@ -1826,6 +1839,19 @@ static void build_pt_update_batch_sram(struct
> xe_migrate *m,
> }
> }
>
> +static bool xe_migrate_vram_use_pde(struct drm_pagemap_addr
> *sram_addr,
> + unsigned long size)
> +{
> + u32 large_size = (0x1 << xe_pt_shift(1));
> + unsigned long i, incr = large_size / PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(size, PAGE_SIZE); i += incr)
> + if (PAGE_SIZE << sram_addr[i].order != large_size)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> enum xe_migrate_copy_dir {
> XE_MIGRATE_COPY_TO_VRAM,
> XE_MIGRATE_COPY_TO_SRAM,
> @@ -1855,6 +1881,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *xe_migrate_vram(struct
> xe_migrate *m,
> PAGE_SIZE : 4;
> int err;
> unsigned long i, j;
> + bool use_pde = xe_migrate_vram_use_pde(sram_addr, len +
> sram_offset);
>
> if (drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, (len & XE_CACHELINE_MASK) ||
> (sram_offset | vram_addr) &
> XE_CACHELINE_MASK))
> @@ -1879,7 +1906,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *xe_migrate_vram(struct
> xe_migrate *m,
> * struct drm_pagemap_addr. Ensure this is the case even with
> higher
> * orders.
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < npages;) {
> + for (i = 0; !use_pde && i < npages;) {
What if the CPU page size is larger than 2M? Don't we still want this?
Thanks,
Stuart
> unsigned int order = sram_addr[i].order;
>
> for (j = 1; j < NR_PAGES(order) && i + j < npages;
> j++)
> @@ -1889,16 +1916,26 @@ static struct dma_fence
> *xe_migrate_vram(struct xe_migrate *m,
> i += NR_PAGES(order);
> }
>
> - build_pt_update_batch_sram(m, bb, pt_slot * XE_PAGE_SIZE,
> - sram_addr, len + sram_offset);
> + if (use_pde)
> + build_pt_update_batch_sram(m, bb, m-
> >large_page_copy_pdes,
> + sram_addr, len +
> sram_offset, 1);
> + else
> + build_pt_update_batch_sram(m, bb, pt_slot *
> XE_PAGE_SIZE,
> + sram_addr, len +
> sram_offset, 0);
>
> if (dir == XE_MIGRATE_COPY_TO_VRAM) {
> - src_L0_ofs = xe_migrate_vm_addr(pt_slot, 0) +
> sram_offset;
> + if (use_pde)
> + src_L0_ofs = m->large_page_copy_ofs +
> sram_offset;
> + else
> + src_L0_ofs = xe_migrate_vm_addr(pt_slot, 0) +
> sram_offset;
> dst_L0_ofs = xe_migrate_vram_ofs(xe, vram_addr,
> false);
>
> } else {
> src_L0_ofs = xe_migrate_vram_ofs(xe, vram_addr,
> false);
> - dst_L0_ofs = xe_migrate_vm_addr(pt_slot, 0) +
> sram_offset;
> + if (use_pde)
> + dst_L0_ofs = m->large_page_copy_ofs +
> sram_offset;
> + else
> + dst_L0_ofs = xe_migrate_vm_addr(pt_slot, 0) +
> sram_offset;
> }
>
> bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-13 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 3:45 [PATCH v5 0/2] Different page size handle in migrate layer Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 3:45 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/xe: Fix build_pt_update_batch_sram for non-4K PAGE_SIZE Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 16:38 ` [v5,1/2] " Simon Richter
2025-10-13 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 3:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/xe: Enable 2M pages in xe_migrate_vram Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 17:08 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2025-10-13 17:14 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 17:22 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 17:34 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 18:01 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-14 2:17 ` Simon Richter
2025-10-14 3:08 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 17:29 ` Simon.Richter
2025-10-13 17:32 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 5:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Different page size handle in migrate layer (rev2) Patchwork
2025-10-13 6:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-13 6:51 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a435a2a974b8627c945471e75c4dc21b835e9d22.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=simon.richter@hogyros.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox