From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Cc: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
siqueira@igalia.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
"Xaver Hugl" <xaver.hugl@gmail.com>,
"Krzysztof Karas" <krzysztof.karas@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-dev@igalia.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Create a task info option for wedge events
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:11:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aC2Yq89IL5tx8MY3@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520163243.328746-2-andrealmeid@igalia.com>
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:32:41PM -0300, André Almeida wrote:
> When a device get wedged, it might be caused by a guilty application.
> For userspace, knowing which task was the cause can be useful for some
> situations, like for implementing a policy, logs or for giving a chance
> for the compositor to let the user know what task caused the problem.
> This is an optional argument, when the task info is not available, the
> PID and TASK string won't appear in the event string.
>
> Sometimes just the PID isn't enough giving that the task might be already
> dead by the time userspace will try to check what was this PID's name,
> so to make the life easier also notify what's the task's name in the user
> event.
...
> -int drm_dev_wedged_event(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long method)
> +int drm_dev_wedged_event(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long method,
> + struct drm_wedge_task_info *info)
> {
> const char *recovery = NULL;
> unsigned int len, opt;
> - /* Event string length up to 28+ characters with available methods */
> - char event_string[32];
> - char *envp[] = { event_string, NULL };
> + char event_string[WEDGE_STR_LEN], pid_string[PID_LEN] = "", comm_string[TASK_COMM_LEN] = "";
> + char *envp[] = { event_string, NULL, NULL, NULL };
>
> len = scnprintf(event_string, sizeof(event_string), "%s", "WEDGED=");
>
> @@ -582,6 +586,13 @@ int drm_dev_wedged_event(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long method)
> drm_info(dev, "device wedged, %s\n", method == DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE ?
> "but recovered through reset" : "needs recovery");
>
> + if (info && ((info->comm && info->comm[0] != '\0'))) {
Thanks for adding this. Should we check if pid > 0?
Also, I was wondering what if the driver only has info on one of the
given members? Should we allow it to be flagged independently?
> + snprintf(pid_string, sizeof(pid_string), "PID=%u", info->pid);
> + snprintf(comm_string, sizeof(comm_string), "TASK=%s", info->comm);
> + envp[1] = pid_string;
> + envp[2] = comm_string;
> + }
> +
> return kobject_uevent_env(&dev->primary->kdev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_wedged_event);
...
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_device.h b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> index e2f894f1b90a..c13fe85210f2 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_device.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,14 @@ struct pci_controller;
> #define DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_REBIND BIT(1) /* unbind + bind driver */
> #define DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_BUS_RESET BIT(2) /* unbind + reset bus device + bind */
>
> +/**
> + * struct drm_wedge_task_info - information about the guilty app of a wedge dev
s/app/task, missed an instance ;)
> + */
> +struct drm_wedge_task_info {
> + pid_t pid;
> + char *comm;
> +};
Raag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 16:32 [PATCH v5 0/3] drm: Create a tas info option for wedge events André Almeida
2025-05-20 16:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] drm: Create a task " André Almeida
2025-05-21 9:11 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2025-05-21 15:17 ` André Almeida
2025-05-20 16:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/doc: Add a section about "Task information" for the wedge API André Almeida
2025-05-20 16:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/amdgpu: Make use of drm_wedge_task_info André Almeida
2025-05-20 17:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm: Create a tas info option for wedge events Patchwork
2025-05-20 17:11 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-05-20 17:12 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-05-20 17:23 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-05-20 17:25 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-05-20 17:27 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-05-20 17:48 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-05-21 1:18 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aC2Yq89IL5tx8MY3@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=krzysztof.karas@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=siqueira@igalia.com \
--cc=xaver.hugl@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox